This silences a section mismatch warning. early_alloc_pgtable() is
called from map_kernel_page() which cannot be __init, but only when
slab_is_available() returns false which can only happen during early
boot.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cpufreq depends on platform firmware to implement PStates. In case of
platform firmware failure, cpufreq should not panic host kernel with
BUG_ON(). Less severe pr_warn() will suffice.
Add firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_OPALv3) check to
skip probing for device-tree on non-powernv platforms.
Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
The sysfs entries are lost because of commit 2213fb1 ("powerpc/eeh:
Skip eeh sysfs when eeh is disabled"). That commit added condition
to create sysfs entries with EEH_ENABLED, which isn't populated
when trying to create sysfs entries on PowerNV platform during system
boot time. The patch fixes the issue by:
* Reoder EEH initialization functions so that they're same on
PowerNV/pSeries.
* Cache PE's primary bus by PowerNV platform instead of EEH core
to avoid kernel crash caused by the function reorder. Another
benefit with this is to avoid one eeh_probe_mode_dev() in EEH
core.
Signed-off-by: Mike Qiu <qiudayu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
The patch adds new IOCTL commands for sPAPR VFIO container device
to support EEH functionality for PCI devices, which have been passed
through from host to somebody else via VFIO.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
The patch exports functions to be used by new VFIO ioctl command,
which will be introduced in subsequent patch, to support EEH
functinality for VFIO PCI devices.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
We must not handle EEH error on devices which are passed to somebody
else. Instead, we expect that the frozen device owner detects an EEH
error and recovers from it.
This avoids EEH error handling on passed through devices so the device
owner gets a chance to handle them.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Scott writes:
Highlights include e6500 hardware threading support, an e6500 TLB erratum
workaround, corenet error reporting, support for a new board, and some
minor fixes.
Some Freescale boards like T1040RDB have an on board CPLD connected on
the IFC bus. Add binding for cpld in board.txt file
Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain <Priyanka.Jain@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
In commit ae91d60ba8, a bug was fixed that
involved converting !x & y to !(x & y). The code below shows the same
pattern, and thus should perhaps be fixed in the same way.
This is not tested and clearly changes the semantics, so it is only
something to consider.
The Coccinelle semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
// <smpl>
@@ expression E1,E2; @@
(
!E1 & !E2
|
- !E1 & E2
+ !(E1 & E2)
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
mpic_msgrs has type struct mpic_msgr **, not struct mpic_msgr *, so the
elements of the array should have pointer type, not structure type.
The advantage of kcalloc is, that will prevent integer overflows which
could result from the multiplication of number of elements and size and
it is also a bit nicer to read.
The Coccinelle semantic patch that makes the first change is as follows:
// <smpl>
@disable sizeof_type_expr@
type T;
T **x;
@@
x =
<+...sizeof(
- T
+ *x
)...+>
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
The CoreNet Coherency Fabric is part of the memory subsystem on
some Freescale QorIQ chips. It can report coherency violations (e.g.
due to misusing memory that is mapped noncoherent) as well as
transactions that do not hit any local access window, or which hit a
local access window with an invalid target ID.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Reviewed-by: Bharat Bhushan <bharat.bhushan@freescale.com>
Erratum A-008139 can cause duplicate TLB entries if an indirect
entry is overwritten using tlbwe while the other thread is using it to
do a lookup. Work around this by using tlbilx to invalidate prior
to overwriting.
To avoid the need to save another register to hold MAS1 during the
workaround code, TID clearing has been moved from tlb_miss_kernel_e6500
until after the SMT section.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
The general idea is that each core will release all of its
threads into the secondary thread startup code, which will
eventually wait in the secondary core holding area, for the
appropriate bit in the PACA to be set. The kick_cpu function
pointer will set that bit in the PACA, and thus "release"
the core/thread to boot. We also need to do a few things that
U-Boot normally does for CPUs (like enable branch prediction).
Signed-off-by: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
[scottwood@freescale.com: various changes, including only enabling
threads if Linux wants to kick them]
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
This ensures that all MSR definitions are consistently unsigned long,
and that MSR_CM does not become 0xffffffff80000000 (this is usually
harmless because MSR is 32-bit on booke and is mainly noticeable when
debugging, but still I'd rather avoid it).
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Michael has been backing me up and helping will all aspects of
maintainership for a while now, let's make it official.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Power8 has a new register (MMCR2), which contains individual freeze bits
for each counter. This is an improvement on previous chips as it means
we can have multiple events on the PMU at the same time with different
exclude_{user,kernel,hv} settings. Previously we had to ensure all
events on the PMU had the same exclude settings.
The core of the patch is fairly simple. We use the 207S feature flag to
indicate that the PMU backend supports per-event excludes, if it's set
we skip the generic logic that enforces the equality of excludes between
events. We also use that flag to skip setting the freeze bits in MMCR0,
the PMU backend is expected to have handled setting them in MMCR2.
The complication arises with EBB. The FCxP bits in MMCR2 are accessible
R/W to a task using EBB. Which means a task using EBB will be able to
see that we are using MMCR2 for freezing, whereas the old logic which
used MMCR0 is not user visible.
The task can not see or affect exclude_kernel & exclude_hv, so we only
need to consider exclude_user.
The table below summarises the behaviour both before and after this
commit is applied:
exclude_user true false
------------------------------------
| User visible | N N
Before | Can freeze | Y Y
| Can unfreeze | N Y
------------------------------------
| User visible | Y Y
After | Can freeze | Y Y
| Can unfreeze | Y/N Y
------------------------------------
So firstly I assert that the simple visibility of the exclude_user
setting in MMCR2 is a non-issue. The event belongs to the task, and
was most likely created by the task. So the exclude_user setting is not
privileged information in any way.
Secondly, the behaviour in the exclude_user = false case is unchanged.
This is important as it is the case that is actually useful, ie. the
event is created with no exclude setting and the task uses MMCR2 to
implement exclusion manually.
For exclude_user = true there is no meaningful change to freezing the
event. Previously the task could use MMCR2 to freeze the event, though
it was already frozen with MMCR0. With the new code the task can use
MMCR2 to freeze the event, though it was already frozen with MMCR2.
The only real change is when exclude_user = true and the task tries to
use MMCR2 to unfreeze the event. Previously this had no effect, because
the event was already frozen in MMCR0. With the new code the task can
unfreeze the event in MMCR2, but at some indeterminate time in the
future the kernel will overwrite its setting and refreeze the event.
Therefore my final assertion is that any task using exclude_user = true
and also fiddling with MMCR2 was deeply confused before this change, and
remains so after it.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To support per-event exclude settings on Power8 we need access to the
struct perf_events in compute_mmcr().
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Because we reuse cpuhw->mmcr on each call to compute_mmcr() there's a
risk that we could forget to set one of the values and use whatever
value was in there previously.
Currently all the implementations are careful to set all the values, but
it's safer to clear them all before we call compute_mmcr().
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Scott Wood
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
Andrey Utkin
Mike Qiu
Gavin Shan
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Shengzhou Liu
Priyanka Jain
Himangi Saraogi
Andy Fleming
Michael Ellerman