Since we have a cooperative mode now with a direct reset, we can avoid
the contention on struct_mutex and instead try then sleep on the
I915_RESET_IN_PROGRESS bit. If the mutex is held and that bit is
cleared, all is fine. Otherwise, we sleep for a bit and try again. In
the worst case we sleep for an extra second waiting for the mutex to be
released (no one touching the GPU is allowed the struct_mutex whilst the
I915_RESET_IN_PROGRESS bit is set). But when we have a direct reset,
this allows us to clean up the reset worker faster.
v2: Remember to call wake_up_bit() after changing (for the faster wakeup
as promised)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160909131201.16673-12-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
If a waiter is holding the struct_mutex, then the reset worker cannot
reset the GPU until the waiter returns. We do not want to return -EAGAIN
form i915_wait_request as that breaks delicate operations like
i915_vma_unbind() which often cannot be restarted easily, and returning
-EIO is just as useless (and has in the past proven dangerous). The
remaining WARN_ON(i915_wait_request) serve as a valuable reminder that
handling errors from an indefinite wait are tricky.
We can keep the current semantic that knowing after a reset is complete,
so is the request, by performing the reset ourselves if we hold the
mutex.
uevent emission is still handled by the reset worker, so it may appear
slightly out of order with respect to the actual reset (and concurrent
use of the device).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160909131201.16673-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In the next patch we want to handle reset directly by a locked waiter in
order to avoid issues with returning before the reset is handled. To
handle the reset, we must first know whether we hold the struct_mutex.
If we do not hold the struct_mtuex we can not perform the reset, but we do
not block the reset worker either (and so we can just continue to wait for
request completion) - otherwise we must relinquish the mutex.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160909131201.16673-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In preparation for introducing a per-engine reset, we can first separate
the mixing of the reset state from the global reset counter.
The loss of atomicity in updating the reset state poses a small problem
for handling the waiters. For requests, this is solved by advancing the
seqno so that a waiter waking up after the reset knows the request is
complete. For pending flips, we still rely on the increment of the
global reset epoch (as well as the reset-in-progress flag) to signify
when the hardware was reset.
The advantage, now that we do not inspect the reset state during reset
itself i.e. we no longer emit requests during reset, is that we can use
the atomic updates of the state flags to ensure that only one reset
worker is active.
v2: Mika spotted that I transformed the i915_gem_wait_for_error() wakeup
into a waiter wakeup.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470414607-32453-6-git-send-email-arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160909131201.16673-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Similar to the issue with reading from the context status buffer,
see commit 26720ab97f ("drm/i915: Move CSB MMIO reads out of the
execlists lock"), we frequently write to the ELSP register (4 writes per
interrupt) and know we hold the required spinlock and forcewake throughout.
We can further reduce the cost of writing these registers beyond the
I915_WRITE_FW() by precomputing the address of the ELSP register. We also
note that the subsequent read serves no purpose here, and are happy to
see it go.
v2: Address I915_WRITE mistakes in changelog
text data bss dec hex filename
1259784 4581 576 1264941 134d2d drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1259720 4581 576 1264877 134ced drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Saves 64 bytes of address recomputation.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160909131201.16673-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This is really a core kernel struct in disguise until we can finally
place it in kernel/. There is an immediate need for a fence collection
mechanism that is more flexible than fence-array, in particular being
able to easily drive request submission via events (and not just
interrupt driven). The same mechanism would be useful for handling
nonblocking and asynchronous atomic modesets, parallel execution and
more, but for the time being just create a local sw fence for execbuf.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160909131201.16673-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platform
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Make the .hws_needs_physical the exception by switching the flag
on earlier platforms since they are fewer to support. Remove the flag on
later GPUs hardware since they all use GTT hws by default.
Switch the logic as well in the driver to reflect this change
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Introducing a GEN2_FEATURES macro to simplify the struct definitions by
platforms given that most of the features are common. Inspired by the
GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others.
Use it for 830, 845g, i85x, i865g.
CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Introducing a GEN3_FEATURES macro to simplify the struct definitions by
platforms given that most of the features are common. Inspired by the
GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others.
Use it for i915g, i915gm, i945g, i945gm, g33 and pnv.
CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Introducing a GEN4_FEATURES macro to simplify the struct
definitions by platforms given that most of the features are common.
Inspired by the GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others.
Use it for i965g, i965gm, g45 and gm45.
CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Introducing a GEN5_FEATURES macro to simplify the struct
definitions by platforms given that most of the features are common.
Inspired by the GEN7_FEATURES macro done by Ben W. and others.
Use it for ilk.
CC: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Moving all GPU features to the platform struct definition allows for
- standard place when adding new features from new platforms
- possible to see supported features when dumping struct
definitions
Signed-off-by: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>