Commit 5800043 (cpufreq: convert cpufreq_driver to using RCU) causes
the following call trace to be spit on boot:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at /scratch/rafael/work/linux-pm/mm/slab.c:3179
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 292, name: systemd-udevd
2 locks held by systemd-udevd/292:
#0: (subsys mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8146851a>] subsys_interface_register+0x4a/0xe0
#1: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81538210>] cpufreq_add_dev_interface+0x60/0x5e0
Pid: 292, comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 3.9.0-rc8+ #323
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81072c90>] __might_sleep+0x140/0x1f0
[<ffffffff811581c2>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x42/0x2b0
[<ffffffff811e7179>] sysfs_new_dirent+0x59/0x130
[<ffffffff811e63cb>] sysfs_add_file_mode+0x6b/0x110
[<ffffffff81538210>] ? cpufreq_add_dev_interface+0x60/0x5e0
[<ffffffff810a3254>] ? __lock_is_held+0x54/0x80
[<ffffffff811e647d>] sysfs_add_file+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffff811e6541>] sysfs_create_file+0x21/0x30
[<ffffffff81538280>] cpufreq_add_dev_interface+0xd0/0x5e0
[<ffffffff81538210>] ? cpufreq_add_dev_interface+0x60/0x5e0
[<ffffffffa000337f>] ? acpi_processor_get_platform_limit+0x32/0xbb [processor]
[<ffffffffa022f540>] ? do_drv_write+0x70/0x70 [acpi_cpufreq]
[<ffffffff810a3254>] ? __lock_is_held+0x54/0x80
[<ffffffff8106c97e>] ? up_read+0x1e/0x40
[<ffffffff8106e632>] ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x72/0xc0
[<ffffffff81538dbd>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x62d/0xae0
[<ffffffff815389b8>] ? cpufreq_add_dev+0x228/0xae0
[<ffffffff81468569>] subsys_interface_register+0x99/0xe0
[<ffffffffa014d000>] ? 0xffffffffa014cfff
[<ffffffff81535d5d>] cpufreq_register_driver+0x9d/0x200
[<ffffffffa014d000>] ? 0xffffffffa014cfff
[<ffffffffa014d0e9>] acpi_cpufreq_init+0xe9/0x1000 [acpi_cpufreq]
[<ffffffff810002fa>] do_one_initcall+0x11a/0x170
[<ffffffff810b4b87>] load_module+0x1cf7/0x2920
[<ffffffff81322580>] ? ddebug_proc_open+0xb0/0xb0
[<ffffffff816baee0>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
[<ffffffff810b5887>] sys_init_module+0xd7/0x120
[<ffffffff816bb6d2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
which is quite obvious, because that commit put (multiple instances
of) sysfs_create_file() under rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock(),
although sysfs_create_file() may cause memory to be allocated with
GFP_KERNEL and that may sleep, which is not permitted in RCU read
critical section.
Revert the buggy commit altogether along with some changes on top
of it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* pm-cpufreq: (57 commits)
cpufreq: MAINTAINERS: Add co-maintainer
cpufreq: pxa2xx: initialize variables
ARM: S5pv210: compiling issue, ARM_S5PV210_CPUFREQ needs CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE=y
cpufreq: cpu0: Put cpu parent node after using it
cpufreq: ARM big LITTLE: Adapt to latest cpufreq updates
cpufreq: ARM big LITTLE: put DT nodes after using them
cpufreq: Don't call __cpufreq_governor() for drivers without target()
cpufreq: exynos5440: Protect OPP search calls with RCU lock
cpufreq: dbx500: Round to closest available freq
cpufreq: Call __cpufreq_governor() with correct policy->cpus mask
cpufreq / intel_pstate: Optimize intel_pstate_set_policy
cpufreq: OMAP: instantiate omap-cpufreq as a platform_driver
arm: exynos: Enable OPP library support for exynos5440
cpufreq: exynos: Remove error return even if no soc is found
cpufreq: exynos: Add cpufreq driver for exynos5440
cpufreq: AMD "frequency sensitivity feedback" powersave bias for ondemand governor
cpufreq: ondemand: allow custom powersave_bias_target handler to be registered
cpufreq: convert cpufreq_driver to using RCU
cpufreq: powerpc/platforms/cell: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq
cpufreq: sparc: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq
...
Conflicts:
MAINTAINERS (with commit a8e39c3 from pm-cpuidle)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h (with commit beb0ff3)
gcc-3.8 correctly found that the variables set by find_freq_tables()
are not initialized if this function is called on something other
than a pxa2xx or pxa3xx:
pxa2xx-cpufreq.c: In function 'pxa_verify_policy':
pxa2xx-cpufreq.c:272:6: warning: 'pxa_freqs_table' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
pxa2xx-cpufreq.c: In function 'pxa_set_target':
pxa2xx-cpufreq.c:345:23: warning: 'pxa_freq_settings' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Rather than adding a bogus initialization that would let us
get a little further before crashing, add an explicit BUG().
We know that this code is designed to run on only these cpus,
so this will fix the build warning and give a more helpful
diagnostic if the code ever changes to run on other machines.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
For arm S5pv210 with allmodconfig, ARM_S5PV210_CPUFREQ need
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE=y, or will cause compiling issue.
The related operation:
+ arm-linux-gnu-ld -EL -p --no-undefined -X --build-id -X -o .tmp_vmlinux1 -T /root/linux-next/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds arch/arm/kernel/head.o init/built-in.o --start-group usr/built-in.o arch/arm/nwfpe/built-in.o arch/arm/vfp/built-in.o arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o arch/arm/mm/built-in.o arch/arm/common/built-in.o arch/arm/net/built-in.o arch/arm/crypto/built-in.o arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/built-in.o arch/arm/plat-samsung/built-in.o kernel/built-in.o mm/built-in.o fs/built-in.o ipc/built-in.o security/built-in.o crypto/built-in.o block/built-in.o arch/arm/lib/lib.a lib/lib.a arch/arm/lib/built-in.o lib/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o sound/built-in.o firmware/built-in.o net/built-in.o --end-group
The related errors:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `s5pv210_target':
drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c:225: undefined reference to `cpufreq_frequency_table_target'
drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c:237: undefined reference to `cpufreq_frequency_table_target'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `s5pv210_verify_speed':
drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c:182: undefined reference to `cpufreq_frequency_table_verify'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `s5pv210_cpu_init':
drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c:556: undefined reference to `cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr'
drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c:560: undefined reference to `cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo'
make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This driver isn't updated to work with latest cpufreq core updates that happened
recently. Fix them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
DT nodes should be put using of_node_put() to balance their usage counts. This
is not done properly in ARM's big LITTLE driver. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Some cpufreq drivers implement their own governor and so don't need
us to call generic governors interface via __cpufreq_governor(). Few
recent commits haven't obeyed this law well and we saw some
regressions.
This patch is an attempt to fix the above issue.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reported-and-tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
As per the OPP library documentation(Documentation/power/opp.txt) all
OPP find/get calls should be protected by RCU locks.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
__cpufreq_governor() must be called with a correct policy->cpus mask.
In __cpufreq_remove_dev() we initially clear policy->cpus with
cpumask_clear_cpu() and then call
__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT). If the governor
is doing some per-cpu stuff in EXIT callback, this can create
uncertain behavior.
Generic governors in drivers/cpufreq/ doesn't do any per-cpu stuff
in EXIT callback and so we don't face any issues currently. But its
better to keep the code clean, so we don't face any issues in future.
Now, we call cpumask_clear_cpu() only when multiple cpus are managed
by policy.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This function is called quite often from other subsystems.
Removed unused call to intel_pstate_get_min_max().
Also when "policy->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE", then
no need to do calculations as the limits will be forced anyway.
Also corrected filename in the header.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
As multi-platform build is being adopted by more and more ARM platforms,
initcall function should be used very carefully. For example, when
CONFIG_ARM_OMAP2PLUS_CPUFREQ is built in the kernel, omap_cpufreq_init()
will be called on all the platforms to initialize omap-cpufreq driver.
Further, on OMAP, we now use Soc generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver using device
tree entries. To allow cpufreq-cpu0 and omap-cpufreq drivers to co-exist
for OMAP in a single image, we need to ensure the following:
1. With device tree boot, we use cpufreq-cpu0
2. With non device tree boot, we use omap-cpufreq
In the case of (1), we will have cpu OPPs and regulator registered
as part of the device tree nodes, to ensure that omap-cpufreq
and cpufreq-cpu0 don't conflict in managing the frequency of the
same CPU, we should not permit omap-cpufreq to be probed.
In the case of (2), we will not have the cpufreq-cpu0 device, hence
only omap-cpufreq will be active.
To eliminate this undesired these effects, we change omap-cpufreq
driver to have it instantiated as a platform_driver and register
"omap-cpufreq" device only when booted without device tree nodes on
OMAP platforms.
This allows the following:
a) Will only run on platforms that create the platform_device
"omap-cpufreq".
b) Since the platform_device is registered only when device tree nodes
are *not* populated, omap-cpufreq driver does not conflict with
the usage of cpufreq-cpu0 driver which is used on OMAP platforms when
device tree nodes are present.
Inspired by commit 5553f9e26f
(cpufreq: instantiate cpufreq-cpu0 as a platform_driver)
[robherring2@gmail.com: reported conflict of omap-cpufreq vs other
driver in an non-device tree supported boot]
Reported-by: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch helps to have single binary for exynos5440 and previous
exynos soc's. This change is needed for adding exynos5440 cpufreq driver
which does not uses exynos-cpufreq common file and adds it own driver.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch adds dvfs support for exynos5440 SOC. This soc has 4 cores and
they scale at same frequency. The nature of exynos5440 clock controller is
different from previous exynos controllers so not using the common exynos
cpufreq framework. The major difference being interrupt notification for
frequency change. Also, OPP library is used for device tree parsing to get
different parameters like frequency, voltage etc. Since the opp library sorts
the frequency table in ascending order so they are again re-arranged in
descending order. This will have one-to-one mapping with the clock controller
state management logic.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Future AMD processors, starting with Family 16h, can provide software
with feedback on how the workload may respond to frequency change --
memory-bound workloads will not benefit from higher frequency, where
as compute-bound workloads will. This patch enables this "frequency
sensitivity feedback" to aid the ondemand governor to make better
frequency change decisions by hooking into the powersave bias.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This allows for another [arch specific] driver to hook into existing
powersave bias function of the ondemand governor. i.e. This allows AMD
specific powersave bias function (in a separate AMD specific driver)
to aid ondemand governor's frequency transition decisions.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
We eventually would like to remove the rwlock cpufreq_driver_lock or
convert it back to a spinlock and protect the read sections with RCU.
The first step in that direction is to make cpufreq_driver use RCU.
I don't see an easy wasy to protect the cpufreq_cpu_data structure
with RCU, so I am leaving it with the rwlock for now since under
certain configs __cpufreq_cpu_get is a hot spot with 256+ cores.
[rjw: Subject, changelog, white space]
Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Rafael J. Wysocki
Arnd Bergmann
Chen Gang
Viresh Kumar
Amit Daniel Kachhap
Mats Fagerstrom
Srinivas Pandruvada
Nishanth Menon
Jacob Shin
Nathan Zimmer