When CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set, it also moves one branch instruction from
ret_from_irq() to ret_from_exception(). Therefore we favour the return
from irq case which should be more common than the other one.
Signed-off-by: Franck Bui-Huu <fbuihuu@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
This did result in double clearing of the error return value on success
only but should make a meassurable overhead for sigreturn.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
When I post a patch (commit f431baa55a),
I just tried to not change behavior of existing codes, but it seems
dec/int-handler.S had been broken since its previous commit
937a801576.
The caller of plat_irq_dispatch do setup/restore TI_REGS($28), so
dec's plat_irq_dispatch should not do it, and there is no need to
adjust RA.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Platforms will now have to supply a function dma_device_is_coherent which
returns if a particular device participates in the coherence domain. For
most platforms this function will always return 0 or 1.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Now that finally all supported versions of binutils have functioning
support for .subsection use .subsection to tweak the branch prediction
I did not modify the R10000 errata variants because it seems unclear if
this will invalidate the workaround which actually relies on the cheesy
prediction of branch likely to cause a misspredict if the sc was
successful.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Commit 9ac7849e35 causes this on S390:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `dmam_noncoherent_release':
dma-mapping.c:(.text+0x1515c): undefined reference to `dma_free_noncoherent'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `dmam_free_noncoherent':
undefined reference to `dma_free_noncoherent'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `dmam_alloc_noncoherent':
undefined reference to `dma_alloc_noncoherent'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We currently check the FIFO once per slice. Optimize that a bit and
only do it as the first thing for a new slice, so we don't end up
doing a single request and then seek to the FIFO requests.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
It must always be the active queue, otherwise it's a bug. So just
use the active_queue, don't pass it in explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
If a slice uses less than it is entitled to (or perhaps more), include
that in the decision on how much time to give it the next time it
gets serviced.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Right now we use slice_start, which gives async queues an unfair
advantage. Chance that to service_last, and base the resorter
on that.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Ralf Baechle
Andrew Sharp
Franck Bui-Huu
Atsushi Nemoto
Franck Bui-Huu
Heiko Carstens
Jens Axboe