ncpfs does not handle references to unlinked directories (or so it would
seem given the ncp_rmdir check). Since it is also possible to rename over
an empty directory, perform the same check here.
CC: Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
hfsplus does not have problems with references to unlinked directories.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
hfs does not have problems with references to unlinked directories.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Move the lock order description after all the includes, remove several
fairly outdated and/or incorrect comments, move Andrea's
copyright/changelog to the top where it belongs, remove the pointless
filename in the top of the file comment, and remove to useless macros.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
The descriptions of bio_add_page() and bio_add_pc_page() are slightly
inconsistent; improve them.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Return -ENODATA when trying to read a user.* attribute which cannot
exist: user space otherwise does not have a reasonable way to
distinguish between non-existent and inaccessible attributes.
Likewise, return -ENODATA when an unprivileged process tries to read a
trusted.* attribute: to unprivileged processes, those attributes are
invisible (listxattr() won't include them).
Related to this bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/660613
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Tell the filesystem if we just updated timestamp (I_DIRTY_SYNC) or
anything else, so that the filesystem can track internally if it
needs to push out a transaction for fdatasync or not.
This is just the prototype change with no user for it yet. I plan
to push large XFS changes for the next merge window, and getting
this trivial infrastructure in this window would help a lot to avoid
tree interdependencies.
Also remove incorrect comments that ->dirty_inode can't block. That
has been changed a long time ago, and many implementations rely on it.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Sage Weil
Christoph Hellwig
Andreas Gruenbacher