Revert most of commit e384e58549
md/bitmap: prepare for storing write-intent-bitmap via dm-dirty-log.
MD should not need to use DM's dirty log - we decided to use md's
bitmaps instead.
Keeping the DIV_ROUND_UP clean-ups that were part of commit
e384e58549, however.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
If device-mapper creates a RAID1 array that includes devices to
be rebuilt, it will deref a NULL pointer when finished because
sysfs is not used by device-mapper instantiated RAID devices.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
While preparing to write a stripe we keep the parity block or blocks
locked (R5_LOCKED) - towards the end of schedule_reconstruction.
If the array is discovered to have failed before this write completes
we can leave those blocks LOCKED, and init_stripe will notice that a
free stripe still has a locked block and will complain.
So clear the R5_LOCKED flag in handle_failed_stripe, and demote the
'BUG' to a 'WARN_ON'.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Read errors are considered to corrected if write-back and re-read
cycle is finished without further problems. Thus moving the rdev->
corrected_errors counting after the re-reading looks more reasonable
IMHO.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Read errors are considered to corrected if write-back and re-read
cycle is finished without further problems. Thus moving the rdev->
corrected_errors counting after the re-reading looks more reasonable
IMHO.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Read errors are considered to corrected if write-back and re-read
cycle is finished without further problems. Thus moving the rdev->
corrected_errors counting after the re-reading looks more reasonable
IMHO. Also included a couple of whitespace fixes on sync_page_io().
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
page_address() returns void pointer, so the casts can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Normally we would fail a device with a READ error. However if doing
so causes the array to fail, it is better to leave the device
in place and just return the read error to the caller.
The current test for decide if the array will fail is overly
simplistic.
We have a function 'enough' which can tell if the array is failed or
not, so use it to guide the decision.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When we get a read error during recovery, RAID10 previously
arranged for the recovering device to appear to fail so that
the recovery stops and doesn't restart. This is misleading and wrong.
Instead, make use of the new recovery_disabled handling and mark
the target device and having recovery disabled.
Add appropriate checks in add_disk and remove_disk so that devices
are removed and not re-added when recovery is disabled.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
If we hit a read error while recovering a mirror, we want to abort the
recovery without necessarily failing the disk - as having a disk this
a read error is better than not having an array at all.
Currently this is managed with a per-array flag "recovery_disabled"
and is only implemented for RAID1. For RAID10 we will need finer
grained control as we might want to disable recovery for individual
devices separately.
So push more of the decision making into the personality.
'recovery_disabled' is now a 'cookie' which is copied when the
personality want to disable recovery and is changed when a device is
added to the array as this is used as a trigger to 'try recovery
again'.
This will allow RAID10 to get the control that it needs.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Commit c89a8eee61 ("Allow faulty devices to be removed from a
readonly array.") added some work on ro array in the function,
but it couldn't be done since we didn't allow the ro array to be
handled from the beginning. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
There are places where sysfs links to rdev are handled
in a same way. Add the helper functions to consolidate
them.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
handle_stripe5() and handle_stripe6() are now virtually identical.
So discard one and rename the other to 'analyse_stripe()'.
It always returns 0, so change it to 'void' and remove the 'done'
variable in handle_stripe().
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
The RAID6 version of this code is usable for RAID5 providing:
- we test "conf->max_degraded" rather than "2" as appropriate
- we make sure s->failed_num[1] is meaningful (and not '-1')
when s->failed > 1
The 'return 1' must become 'goto finish' in the new location.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Apart from 'prexor' which can only be set for RAID5, and
'qd_idx' which can only be meaningful for RAID6, these two
chunks of code are nearly the same.
So combine them into one adding a test to call either
handle_parity_checks5 or handle_parity_checks6 as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
RAID6 is only allowed to choose 'reconstruct-write' while RAID5 is
also allow 'read-modify-write'
Apart from this difference, handle_stripe_dirtying[56] are nearly
identical. So resolve these differences and create just one function.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Provided that ->failed_num[1] is not a valid device number (which is
easily achieved) fetch_block6 provides all the functionality of
fetch_block5.
So remove the latter and rename the former to simply "fetch_block".
Then handle_stripe_fill5 and handle_stripe_fill6 become the same and
can similarly be united.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Next patch will unite fetch_block5 and fetch_block6.
First I want to make the differences a little more clear.
For RAID6 if we are writing at all and there is a failed device, then
we need to load or compute every block so we can do a
reconstruct-write.
This case isn't needed for RAID5 - we will do a read-modify-write in
that case.
So make that test a separate test in fetch_block6 rather than merged
with two other tests.
Make a similar change in fetch_block5 so the one bit that is not
needed for RAID6 is clearly separate.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
The difference between the RAID5 and RAID6 code here is easily
resolved using conf->max_degraded.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Prior to commit ab69ae12ce the code in handle_stripe5 and
handle_stripe6 to "Finish reconstruct operations initiated by the
expansion process" was identical.
That commit added an identical stanza of code to each function, but in
different places. That was careless.
The raid5 code was correct, so move that out into handle_stripe and
remove raid6 version.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
This arg is only used to differentiate between RAID5 and RAID6 but
that is not needed. For RAID5, raid5_compute_sector will set qd_idx
to "~0" so j with certainly not equals qd_idx, so there is no need
for a guard on that condition.
So remove the guard and remove the arg from the declaration and
callers of handle_stripe_expansion.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
By defining the 'stripe_head_state' in 'handle_stripe', we can move
some common code out of handle_stripe[56]() and into handle_stripe.
The means that all accesses for stripe_head_state in handle_stripe[56]
need to be 's->' instead of 's.', but the compiler should inline
those functions and just use a direct stack reference, and future
patches while hoist most of this code up into handle_stripe()
so we will revert to "s.".
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Adding these three fields will allow more common code to be moved
to handle_stripe()
struct field rearrangement by Namhyung Kim.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Jonathan Brassow
NeilBrown
Namhyung Kim
Christian Dietrich
Akinobu Mita