The user space interface does not filter out offline cpus. It merily
verifies that the mask contains at least one online cpu. So the
selector in the irq chip implementation needs to make sure to pick
only an online cpu because otherwise:
Offline Core 1
Set affinity to 0xe
Selector will pick first set bit, i.e. core 1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: xtensa <linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>
The vmbus/hyperv interrupt handling is another complete trainwreck and
probably the worst of all currently in tree.
If CONFIG_HYPERV=y then the interrupt delivery to the vmbus happens
via the direct HYPERVISOR_CALLBACK_VECTOR. So far so good, but:
The driver requests first a normal device interrupt. The only reason
to do so is to increment the interrupt stats of that device
interrupt. For no reason it also installs a private flow handler.
We have proper accounting mechanisms for direct vectors, but of
course it's too much effort to add that 5 lines of code.
Aside of that the alloc_intr_gate() is not protected against
reallocation which makes module reload impossible.
Solution to the problem is simple to rip out the whole mess and
implement it correctly.
First of all move all that code to arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c and
merily install the HYPERVISOR_CALLBACK_VECTOR with proper reallocation
protection and use the proper direct vector accounting mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linuxdrivers <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>
Cc: x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140223212739.028307673@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The pm-mmp2 and pm-pxa910 power management related irq_set_wake
callbacks fiddle pointlessly with the irq actions for no reason except
for lack of understanding how the wakeup mechanism works.
On supsend the core disables all interrupts lazily, i.e. it does not
mask them at the irq controller level. So any interrupt which is
firing during suspend will mark the corresponding interrupt line as
pending. Just before the core powers down it checks whether there are
interrupts pending from interrupt lines which are marked as wakeup
sources and if so it aborts the suspend and resends the interrupts.
If there was no interrupt at this point, the cpu goes into suspend
with these interrupts unmasked.
The IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag for interrupt actions is a totally different
mechanism. That allows the device driver to prevent the core from
disabling the interrupt despite the fact that it is not marked as a
wakeup source. This has nothing to do with the case at hand. It was
introduced for special cases where lazy disable is not possible.
Remove the nonsense along with the braindamaged boundary check. The
core code does NOT call these functions out of boundary.
Add a FIXME comment to an unhandled error path which merily printks
some useless blurb instead of returning a proper error code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Cc: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140223212737.214342433@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
commit 91150af3a (powerpc/eeh: Fix unbalanced enable for IRQ) is
another brilliant example of trainwreck engineering.
The patch "fixes" the issue of an unbalanced call to irq_enable()
which causes a prominent warning by checking the disabled state of the
interrupt line and call conditionally into the core code.
This is wrong in two aspects:
1) The warning is there to tell users, that they need to fix their
asymetric enable/disable patterns by finding the root cause and
solving it there.
It's definitely not meant to work around it by conditionally
calling into the core code depending on the random state of the irq
line.
Asymetric irq_disable/enable calls are a clear sign of wrong usage
of the interfaces which have to be cured at the root and not by
somehow hacking around it.
2) The abuse of core internal data structure instead of using the
proper interfaces for retrieving the information for the 'hack
around'
irq_desc is core internal and it's clear enough stated.
Replace at least the irq_desc abuse with the proper functions and add
a big fat comment why this is absurd and completely wrong.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: ppc <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140223212736.562906212@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
I'm really grumpy about this one. The line:
#include "../../../kernel/irq/settings.h"
should have been an alarm sign for all people who added their SOB to
this trainwreck.
When I cleaned up the mess people made with interrupt descriptors a
few years ago, I warned that I'm going to hunt down new offenders and
treat them with stinking trouts. In this case I'll use frozen shark
for a better educational value.
The whole idiocy which was done there could have been avoided with two
lines of perfectly fine code. And do not complain about the lack of
correct examples in tree.
The solution is simple:
Remove the brainfart and use the proper functions, which should
have been used in the first place
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@freescale.com>
Cc: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: ppc <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140223212736.451970660@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Michael Opdenacker
Thomas Gleixner
Jason Cooper