Remove the cl_recdir field from the nfs4_client struct. Instead, just
compute it on the fly when and if it's needed, which is now only when
the legacy client tracking code is in effect.
The error handling in the legacy client tracker is also changed to
handle the case where md5 is unavailable. In that case, we'll warn
the admin with a KERN_ERR message and disable the client tracking.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The current code requires that we md5 hash the name in order to store
the client in the confirmed and unconfirmed trees. Change it instead
to store the clients in a pair of rbtrees, and simply compare the
cl_names directly instead of hashing them. This also necessitates that
we add a new flag to the clp->cl_flags field to indicate which tree
the client is currently in.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
When nfsd starts, the legacy reboot recovery code creates a tracking
struct for each directory in the v4recoverydir. When the grace period
ends, it basically does a "readdir" on the directory again, and matches
each dentry in there to an existing client id to see if it should be
removed or not. If the matching client doesn't exist, or hasn't
reclaimed its state then it will remove that dentry.
This is pretty inefficient since it involves doing a lot of hash-bucket
searching. It also means that we have to keep relying on being able to
search for a nfs4_client by md5 hashed cl_recdir name.
Instead, add a pointer to the nfs4_client that indicates the association
between the nfs4_client_reclaim and nfs4_client. When a reclaim operation
comes in, we set the pointer to make that association. On gracedone, the
legacy client tracker will keep the recdir around iff:
1/ there is a reclaim record for the directory
...and...
2/ there's an association between the reclaim record and a client record
-- that is, a create or check operation was performed on the client that
matches that directory.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Later callers will need to make changes to the record.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
We'll need to be able to call this from nfs4recover.c eventually.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Currently, it takes a client pointer, but later we're going to need to
search for these records without knowing whether a matching client even
exists.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Let's shoot for removing the nfsdcld upcall in 3.10. Most likely,
no one is actually using it so I don't expect this warning to
fire often (except maybe on misconfigured systems).
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The usermodehelper upcall program can then decide to use this info as
a (one-way) transition mechanism to the new scheme. When a "check"
upcall occurs and the client doesn't exist in the database, we can
look to see whether the directory exists. If it does, then we'd add
the client to the database, remove the legacy recdir, and return
success to the kernel to allow the recovery to proceed.
For gracedone, we simply pass the v4recovery "topdir" so that the
upcall can clean it out prior to returning to the kernel.
A module parm is also added to disable the legacy conversion if
the admin chooses.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
First, try to use the new usermodehelper upcall. It should succeed or
fail quickly, so there's little cost to doing so.
If it fails, and the legacy tracking dir exists, use that. If it
doesn't exist then fall back to using nfsdcld.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Add a new client tracker upcall type that uses call_usermodehelper to
call out to a program. This seems to be the preferred method of
calling out to usermode these days for seldom-called upcalls. It's
simple and doesn't require a running daemon, so it should "just work"
as long as the binary is installed.
The client tracking exit operation is also changed to check for a
NULL pointer before running. The UMH upcall doesn't need to do anything
at module teardown time.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
If the credential save fails, then we'll leak our mnt_want_write_file
reference.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
For now this only adds support for AUTH_NULL. (Previously we assumed
AUTH_UNIX.) We'll also need AUTH_GSS, which is trickier.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
We're currently ignoring the callback security parameters specified in
create_session, and just assuming the client wants auth_sys, because
that's all the current linux client happens to care about. But this
could cause us callbacks to fail to a client that wanted something
different.
For now, all we're doing is no longer ignoring the uid and gid passed in
the auth_sys case. Further patches will add support for auth_null and
gss (and possibly use more of the auth_sys information; the spec wants
us to use exactly the credential we're passed, though it's hard to
imagine why a client would care).
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
NFSv4 shares the same struct file across multiple writes. (And we'd
like NFSv2 and NFSv3 to do that as well some day.)
So setting O_SYNC on the struct file as a way to request a synchronous
write doesn't work.
Instead, do a vfs_fsync_range() in that case.
Reported-by: Peter Staubach <pstaubach@exagrid.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
I don't really see how you could claim to support nfsd and not support
fsync somehow.
And in practice a quick look through the exportable filesystems suggests
the only ones without an ->fsync are read-only (efs, isofs, squashfs) or
in-memory (shmem).
Also, performing a write and then returning an error if the sync fails
(as we would do here in the wgather case) seems unhelpful to clients.
Also remove an incorrect comment.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
These conditions would indeed indicate bugs in the code, but if we want
to hear about them we're likely better off warning and returning than
immediately dying while holding file_lock_lock.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Jeff Layton
J. Bruce Fields
Yanchuan Nian