Add IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE in addition to IRQ_SET_MASK_OK and
IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY to support stacked irqchip. IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE
is the same as IRQ_SET_MASK_OK to irq core. To stacked irqchip, it means
that ascendant irqchips have done all the work and no more handling
needed in descendant irqchips.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We plan to use hierarchy irqdomain to suppport CPU vector assignment,
interrupt remapping controller, IO-APIC controller, MSI interrupt
and hypertransport interrupt etc on x86 platforms. So extend irqdomain
interfaces to support hierarchy irqdomain.
There are already many clients of current irqdomain interfaces.
To minimize the changes, we choose to introduce new version 2 interfaces
to support hierarchy instead of extending existing irqdomain interfaces.
According to Thomas's suggestion, the most important design decision is
to build hierarchy struct irq_data to support hierarchy irqdomain, so
hierarchy irqdomain related data could be saved in struct irq_data.
With support of hierarchy irq_data, we could also support stacked
irq_chips. This is most useful in case of set_affinity().
The new hierarchy irqdomain introduces following interfaces:
1) irq_domain_alloc_irqs()/irq_domain_free_irqs(): allocate/release IRQ
and related resources.
2) __irq_domain_alloc_irqs(): a special version to support legacy IRQs.
3) irq_domain_activate_irq()/irq_domain_deactivate_irq(): program
interrupt controllers to activate/deactivate interrupt.
There are also several help functions to ease irqdomain implemenations:
1) irq_domain_get_irq_data(): get irq_data associated with a specific
irqdomain.
2) irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(): save irqdomain specific data into
irq_data.
3) irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent()/irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(): invoke
parent irqdomain's alloc/free callbacks.
We also changed irq_startup()/irq_shutdown() to invoke
irq_domain_activate_irq()/irq_domain_deactivate_irq() to program
interrupt controller when start/stop interrupts.
[ tglx: Folded parts of the later patch series in ]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
mask/unmask_msi_irq and __mask_msi/msix_irq are PCI/MSI specific
functions and should be named accordingly. This is a preparatory patch
to support MSI on non PCI devices.
Rename mask/unmask_msi_irq to pci_msi_mask/unmask_irq and document the
functions. Provide conversion helpers.
Rename __mask_msi/msix_irq to __pci_msi/msix_desc_mask so its clear
that they operated on msi_desc. Fixup the only user outside of
pci/msi.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
There are no users of the struct hw_pci.add_bus() or .remove_bus() methods,
so remove the pointers from hw_pci. That makes pcibios_add_bus() and
pcibios_remove_bus() themselves superfluous, so remove them as well.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Save MSI controller in pci_sys_data instead of assigning MSI controller
pointer to every PCI bus in .add_bus().
[bhelgaas: use xilinx_pcie_msi_chip, not xilinx_pcie_msi_controller]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Save MSI controller in pci_sys_data instead of assigning MSI controller
pointer to every PCI bus in .add_bus().
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Save MSI controller in pci_sys_data instead of assigning MSI controller
pointer to every PCI bus in .add_bus().
[bhelgaas: use struct rcar_msi.chip, not ctrl]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Save MSI controller in pci_sys_data instead of assigning MSI controller
pointer to every PCI bus in .add_bus().
[bhelgaas: use dw_pcie_msi_chip, not dw_pcie_msi_controller]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Save MSI controller in pci_sys_data instead of assigning MSI controller
pointer to every PCI bus in .add_bus().
[bhelgaas: use struct tegra_msi.chip, not ctrl]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Currently ARM associates an MSI controller with a PCI bus by defining
pcibios_add_bus() and using it to call a struct hw_pci.add_bus() method.
That method sets the struct pci_bus "msi" member. That's unwieldy and
unnecessarily couples MSI with the PCI enumeration code.
On ARM, all devices under the same PCI host bridge share an MSI controller,
so add an msi_controller pointer to the struct pci_sys_data and implement
pcibios_msi_controller() to retrieve it.
This is a step toward moving the msi_controller pointer into the generic
struct pci_host_bridge.
[bhelgaas: changelog, take pci_dev instead of pci_bus]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Add pcibios_msi_controller() to get the msi_controller associated with a
PCI device. This is to allow arches to store the msi_controller in the
arch-specific PCI sysdata.
[bhelgaas: changelog, take pci_dev instead of pci_bus]
Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
"msi_chip" isn't very descriptive, so rename it to "msi_controller". That
tells a little more about what it does and is already used in device tree
bindings.
No functional change.
[bhelgaas: changelog, change *only* the struct name so it's reviewable]
Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Jiang Liu
Thomas Gleixner
Yingjoe Chen
Yijing Wang