make C=2 fs/btrfs/ CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
I tried to filter out the warnings for which patches have already
been sent to the mailing list, pending for inclusion in btrfs-next.
All these changes should be obviously safe.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If the inode ref key was not found and the current leaf slot
was 0 (first item in the leaf) the code would always return
-ENOENT. This was not correct because the desired inode ref
item might be the last item in the previous leaf.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If the path doesn't fit in the input buffer, return ENAMETOOLONG
instead of returning with a success code (0) and a partially
filled and right justified buffer.
Also removed useless buffer pointer check outside the while loop.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
btrfs_free_qgroup_config() is not only called by open/close_ctree(),but
also btrfs_disable_quota().And for btrfs_disable_quota(),we have set
'quota_root' to be null before calling btrfs_free_qgroup_config(),so it
is safe to cleanup in-memory structures without lock held.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
When disabling quota, we should clear out list 'dirty_qgroups',otherwise,
we will get oops if enabling quota again. Fix this by abstracting similar
code from del_qgroup_rb().
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the
trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only. The way
we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are
not the same within the leaves. So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has
been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and
check it against the parent root. If the items match exactly then we don't do
anything. This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the
name and the parent objectid. If you move the file from a directory and then
remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as
the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will
assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive.
In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really
is the same or not. So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the
items match. Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra
checking, otherwise we just keep processing. The extra checking is to look up
the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the
generation of the send volume. If they match then they are the same directory
and we are good to go. If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs
list.
This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup
when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode. So in the case of looking
for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the
case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send
volume to compare with.
There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we
needed to check. Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same
inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value. So
instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then
process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether.
Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving
directories (test group 32). With this patch we now pass these tests, and all
of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The plan is to have a bunch of unit tests that run when btrfs is loaded when you
build with the appropriate config option. My ultimate goal is to have a test
for every non-static function we have, but at first I'm going to focus on the
things that cause us the most problems. To start out with this just adds a
tests/ directory and moves the existing free space cache tests into that
directory and sets up all of the infrastructure. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
I noticed while looking at a deadlock that we are always starting a transaction
in cow_file_range(). This isn't really needed since we only need a transaction
if we are doing an inline extent, or if the allocator needs to allocate a chunk.
So push down all the transaction start stuff to be closer to where we actually
need a transaction in all of these cases. This will hopefully reduce our write
latency when we are committing often. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
I added a patch where we started taking the ordered operations mutex when we
waited on ordered extents. We need this because we splice the list and process
it, so if a flusher came in during this scenario it would think the list was
empty and we'd usually get an early ENOSPC. The problem with this is that this
lock is used in transaction committing. So we end up with something like this
Transaction commit
-> wait on writers
Delalloc flusher
-> run_ordered_operations (holds mutex)
->wait for filemap-flush to do its thing
flush task
-> cow_file_range
->wait on btrfs_join_transaction because we're commiting
some other task
-> commit_transaction because we notice trans->transaction->flush is set
-> run_ordered_operations (hang on mutex)
We need to disentangle the ordered operations flushing from the delalloc
flushing, since they are separate things. This solves the deadlock issue I was
seeing. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
There are several places where we BUG_ON() if we fail to remove the orphan items
and such, which is not ok, so remove those and either abort or just carry on.
This also fixes a problem where if we couldn't start a transaction we wouldn't
actually remove the orphan item reserve for the inode. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Eric pointed out that btrfs will happily allow you to delete the default subvol.
This is a problem obviously since the next time you go to mount the file system
it will freak out because it can't find the root. Fix this by adding a check to
see if our default subvol points to the subvol we are trying to delete, and if
it does not allowing it to happen. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We have logic to see if we've already created a parent directory by check to see
if an inode inside of that directory has a lower inode number than the one we
are currently processing. The logic is that if there is a lower inode number
then we would have had to made sure the directory was created at that previous
point. The problem is that subvols inode numbers count from the lowest objectid
in the root tree, which may be less than our current progress. So just skip if
our dir item key is a root item. This fixes the original test and the xfstest
version I made that added an extra subvol create. Thanks,
Reported-by: Emil Karlson <jekarlson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This patch adds an ioctl, BTRFS_IOC_FILE_EXTENT_SAME which will try to
de-duplicate a list of extents across a range of files.
Internally, the ioctl re-uses code from the clone ioctl. This avoids
rewriting a large chunk of extent handling code.
Userspace passes in an array of file, offset pairs along with a length
argument. The ioctl will then (for each dedupe) do a byte-by-byte comparison
of the user data before deduping the extent. Status and number of bytes
deduped are returned for each operation.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
We want this for btrfs_extent_same. Basically readpage and friends do their
own extent locking but for the purposes of dedupe, we want to have both
files locked down across a set of readpage operations (so that we can
compare data). Introduce this variant and a flag which can be set for
extent_read_full_page() to indicate that we are already locked.
Partial credit for this patch goes to Gabriel de Perthuis <g2p.code@gmail.com>
as I have included a fix from him to the original patch which avoids a
deadlock on compressed extents.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
There's some 250+ lines here that are easily encapsulated into their own
function. I don't change how anything works here, just create and document
the new btrfs_clone() function from btrfs_ioctl_clone() code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The range locking in btrfs_ioctl_clone is trivially broken out into it's own
function. This reduces the complexity of btrfs_ioctl_clone() by a small bit
and makes that locking code available to future functions in
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
In extent-tree.c:do_chunk_alloc(), early on we returned 0 (success)
when the target space was full and when chunk allocation is needed.
However, later on in that same function we return ENOSPC if
btrfs_alloc_chunk() fails (and chunk allocation was needed) and
set the space's full flag.
This was inconsistent, as -ENOSPC should be returned if the space
is full and a chunk allocation needs to performed. If the space is
full but no chunk allocation is needed, just return 0 (success).
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
In tree-log.c:replay_one_name(), if memory allocation for
the name fails, ensure we iput the dir inode we got before
before we return.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
The rule originally comes from nocow writing, but snapshot-aware
defrag is a different case, the extent has been writen and we're
not going to change the extent but add a reference on the data.
So we're able to allow such compressed extents to be merged into
one bigger extent if they're pointing to the same data.
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
I'ts hardcoded to 30 seconds which is fine for most users. Higher values
defer data being synced to permanent storage with obvious consequences
when the system crashes. The upper bound is not forced, but a warning is
printed if it's more than 300 seconds (5 minutes).
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
There is no reason we can't just set the path to blocking and then do normal
GFP_NOFS allocations for these extent buffers. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Sergei Trofimovich
Stefan Behrens
Filipe David Borba Manana
Wang Shilong
Josef Bacik
Mark Fasheh
Liu Bo
David Sterba