You've already forked linux-apfs
mirror of
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs.git
synced 2026-05-01 15:00:59 -07:00
Merge branch 'upstream-fixes' into upstream
Conflicts: drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c
This commit is contained in:
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ Contents:
|
||||
- Control dependencies.
|
||||
- SMP barrier pairing.
|
||||
- Examples of memory barrier sequences.
|
||||
- Read memory barriers vs load speculation.
|
||||
|
||||
(*) Explicit kernel barriers.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -248,7 +249,7 @@ And there are a number of things that _must_ or _must_not_ be assumed:
|
||||
we may get either of:
|
||||
|
||||
STORE *A = X; Y = LOAD *A;
|
||||
STORE *A = Y;
|
||||
STORE *A = Y = X;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
=========================
|
||||
@@ -344,9 +345,12 @@ Memory barriers come in four basic varieties:
|
||||
|
||||
(4) General memory barriers.
|
||||
|
||||
A general memory barrier is a combination of both a read memory barrier
|
||||
and a write memory barrier. It is a partial ordering over both loads and
|
||||
stores.
|
||||
A general memory barrier gives a guarantee that all the LOAD and STORE
|
||||
operations specified before the barrier will appear to happen before all
|
||||
the LOAD and STORE operations specified after the barrier with respect to
|
||||
the other components of the system.
|
||||
|
||||
A general memory barrier is a partial ordering over both loads and stores.
|
||||
|
||||
General memory barriers imply both read and write memory barriers, and so
|
||||
can substitute for either.
|
||||
@@ -546,9 +550,9 @@ write barrier, though, again, a general barrier is viable:
|
||||
=============== ===============
|
||||
a = 1;
|
||||
<write barrier>
|
||||
b = 2; x = a;
|
||||
b = 2; x = b;
|
||||
<read barrier>
|
||||
y = b;
|
||||
y = a;
|
||||
|
||||
Or:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -563,6 +567,18 @@ Or:
|
||||
Basically, the read barrier always has to be there, even though it can be of
|
||||
the "weaker" type.
|
||||
|
||||
[!] Note that the stores before the write barrier would normally be expected to
|
||||
match the loads after the read barrier or data dependency barrier, and vice
|
||||
versa:
|
||||
|
||||
CPU 1 CPU 2
|
||||
=============== ===============
|
||||
a = 1; }---- --->{ v = c
|
||||
b = 2; } \ / { w = d
|
||||
<write barrier> \ <read barrier>
|
||||
c = 3; } / \ { x = a;
|
||||
d = 4; }---- --->{ y = b;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
EXAMPLES OF MEMORY BARRIER SEQUENCES
|
||||
------------------------------------
|
||||
@@ -600,8 +616,8 @@ STORE B, STORE C } all occuring before the unordered set of { STORE D, STORE E
|
||||
| | +------+
|
||||
+-------+ : :
|
||||
|
|
||||
| Sequence in which stores committed to memory system
|
||||
| by CPU 1
|
||||
| Sequence in which stores are committed to the
|
||||
| memory system by CPU 1
|
||||
V
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -683,14 +699,12 @@ then the following will occur:
|
||||
| : : | |
|
||||
| : : | CPU 2 |
|
||||
| +-------+ | |
|
||||
\ | X->9 |------>| |
|
||||
\ +-------+ | |
|
||||
----->| B->2 | | |
|
||||
+-------+ | |
|
||||
Makes sure all effects ---> ddddddddddddddddd | |
|
||||
prior to the store of C +-------+ | |
|
||||
are perceptible to | B->2 |------>| |
|
||||
successive loads +-------+ | |
|
||||
| | X->9 |------>| |
|
||||
| +-------+ | |
|
||||
Makes sure all effects ---> \ ddddddddddddddddd | |
|
||||
prior to the store of C \ +-------+ | |
|
||||
are perceptible to ----->| B->2 |------>| |
|
||||
subsequent loads +-------+ | |
|
||||
: : +-------+
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -699,73 +713,239 @@ following sequence of events:
|
||||
|
||||
CPU 1 CPU 2
|
||||
======================= =======================
|
||||
{ A = 0, B = 9 }
|
||||
STORE A=1
|
||||
STORE B=2
|
||||
STORE C=3
|
||||
<write barrier>
|
||||
STORE D=4
|
||||
STORE E=5
|
||||
LOAD A
|
||||
STORE B=2
|
||||
LOAD B
|
||||
LOAD C
|
||||
LOAD D
|
||||
LOAD E
|
||||
LOAD A
|
||||
|
||||
Without intervention, CPU 2 may then choose to perceive the events on CPU 1 in
|
||||
some effectively random order, despite the write barrier issued by CPU 1:
|
||||
|
||||
+-------+ : :
|
||||
| | +------+
|
||||
| |------>| C=3 | }
|
||||
| | : +------+ }
|
||||
| | : | A=1 | }
|
||||
| | : +------+ }
|
||||
| CPU 1 | : | B=2 | }---
|
||||
| | +------+ } \
|
||||
| | wwwwwwwwwwwww} \
|
||||
| | +------+ } \ : : +-------+
|
||||
| | : | E=5 | } \ +-------+ | |
|
||||
| | : +------+ } \ { | C->3 |------>| |
|
||||
| |------>| D=4 | } \ { +-------+ : | |
|
||||
| | +------+ \ { | E->5 | : | |
|
||||
+-------+ : : \ { +-------+ : | |
|
||||
Transfer -->{ | A->1 | : | CPU 2 |
|
||||
from CPU 1 { +-------+ : | |
|
||||
to CPU 2 { | D->4 | : | |
|
||||
{ +-------+ : | |
|
||||
{ | B->2 |------>| |
|
||||
+-------+ | |
|
||||
: : +-------+
|
||||
+-------+ : : : :
|
||||
| | +------+ +-------+
|
||||
| |------>| A=1 |------ --->| A->0 |
|
||||
| | +------+ \ +-------+
|
||||
| CPU 1 | wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww \ --->| B->9 |
|
||||
| | +------+ | +-------+
|
||||
| |------>| B=2 |--- | : :
|
||||
| | +------+ \ | : : +-------+
|
||||
+-------+ : : \ | +-------+ | |
|
||||
---------->| B->2 |------>| |
|
||||
| +-------+ | CPU 2 |
|
||||
| | A->0 |------>| |
|
||||
| +-------+ | |
|
||||
| : : +-------+
|
||||
\ : :
|
||||
\ +-------+
|
||||
---->| A->1 |
|
||||
+-------+
|
||||
: :
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
If, however, a read barrier were to be placed between the load of C and the
|
||||
load of D on CPU 2, then the partial ordering imposed by CPU 1 will be
|
||||
perceived correctly by CPU 2.
|
||||
If, however, a read barrier were to be placed between the load of E and the
|
||||
load of A on CPU 2:
|
||||
|
||||
+-------+ : :
|
||||
| | +------+
|
||||
| |------>| C=3 | }
|
||||
| | : +------+ }
|
||||
| | : | A=1 | }---
|
||||
| | : +------+ } \
|
||||
| CPU 1 | : | B=2 | } \
|
||||
| | +------+ \
|
||||
| | wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww \
|
||||
| | +------+ \ : : +-------+
|
||||
| | : | E=5 | } \ +-------+ | |
|
||||
| | : +------+ }--- \ { | C->3 |------>| |
|
||||
| |------>| D=4 | } \ \ { +-------+ : | |
|
||||
| | +------+ \ -->{ | B->2 | : | |
|
||||
+-------+ : : \ { +-------+ : | |
|
||||
\ { | A->1 | : | CPU 2 |
|
||||
\ +-------+ | |
|
||||
At this point the read ----> \ rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr | |
|
||||
barrier causes all effects \ +-------+ | |
|
||||
prior to the storage of C \ { | E->5 | : | |
|
||||
to be perceptible to CPU 2 -->{ +-------+ : | |
|
||||
{ | D->4 |------>| |
|
||||
+-------+ | |
|
||||
: : +-------+
|
||||
CPU 1 CPU 2
|
||||
======================= =======================
|
||||
{ A = 0, B = 9 }
|
||||
STORE A=1
|
||||
<write barrier>
|
||||
STORE B=2
|
||||
LOAD B
|
||||
<read barrier>
|
||||
LOAD A
|
||||
|
||||
then the partial ordering imposed by CPU 1 will be perceived correctly by CPU
|
||||
2:
|
||||
|
||||
+-------+ : : : :
|
||||
| | +------+ +-------+
|
||||
| |------>| A=1 |------ --->| A->0 |
|
||||
| | +------+ \ +-------+
|
||||
| CPU 1 | wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww \ --->| B->9 |
|
||||
| | +------+ | +-------+
|
||||
| |------>| B=2 |--- | : :
|
||||
| | +------+ \ | : : +-------+
|
||||
+-------+ : : \ | +-------+ | |
|
||||
---------->| B->2 |------>| |
|
||||
| +-------+ | CPU 2 |
|
||||
| : : | |
|
||||
| : : | |
|
||||
At this point the read ----> \ rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr | |
|
||||
barrier causes all effects \ +-------+ | |
|
||||
prior to the storage of B ---->| A->1 |------>| |
|
||||
to be perceptible to CPU 2 +-------+ | |
|
||||
: : +-------+
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
To illustrate this more completely, consider what could happen if the code
|
||||
contained a load of A either side of the read barrier:
|
||||
|
||||
CPU 1 CPU 2
|
||||
======================= =======================
|
||||
{ A = 0, B = 9 }
|
||||
STORE A=1
|
||||
<write barrier>
|
||||
STORE B=2
|
||||
LOAD B
|
||||
LOAD A [first load of A]
|
||||
<read barrier>
|
||||
LOAD A [second load of A]
|
||||
|
||||
Even though the two loads of A both occur after the load of B, they may both
|
||||
come up with different values:
|
||||
|
||||
+-------+ : : : :
|
||||
| | +------+ +-------+
|
||||
| |------>| A=1 |------ --->| A->0 |
|
||||
| | +------+ \ +-------+
|
||||
| CPU 1 | wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww \ --->| B->9 |
|
||||
| | +------+ | +-------+
|
||||
| |------>| B=2 |--- | : :
|
||||
| | +------+ \ | : : +-------+
|
||||
+-------+ : : \ | +-------+ | |
|
||||
---------->| B->2 |------>| |
|
||||
| +-------+ | CPU 2 |
|
||||
| : : | |
|
||||
| : : | |
|
||||
| +-------+ | |
|
||||
| | A->0 |------>| 1st |
|
||||
| +-------+ | |
|
||||
At this point the read ----> \ rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr | |
|
||||
barrier causes all effects \ +-------+ | |
|
||||
prior to the storage of B ---->| A->1 |------>| 2nd |
|
||||
to be perceptible to CPU 2 +-------+ | |
|
||||
: : +-------+
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
But it may be that the update to A from CPU 1 becomes perceptible to CPU 2
|
||||
before the read barrier completes anyway:
|
||||
|
||||
+-------+ : : : :
|
||||
| | +------+ +-------+
|
||||
| |------>| A=1 |------ --->| A->0 |
|
||||
| | +------+ \ +-------+
|
||||
| CPU 1 | wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww \ --->| B->9 |
|
||||
| | +------+ | +-------+
|
||||
| |------>| B=2 |--- | : :
|
||||
| | +------+ \ | : : +-------+
|
||||
+-------+ : : \ | +-------+ | |
|
||||
---------->| B->2 |------>| |
|
||||
| +-------+ | CPU 2 |
|
||||
| : : | |
|
||||
\ : : | |
|
||||
\ +-------+ | |
|
||||
---->| A->1 |------>| 1st |
|
||||
+-------+ | |
|
||||
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr | |
|
||||
+-------+ | |
|
||||
| A->1 |------>| 2nd |
|
||||
+-------+ | |
|
||||
: : +-------+
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The guarantee is that the second load will always come up with A == 1 if the
|
||||
load of B came up with B == 2. No such guarantee exists for the first load of
|
||||
A; that may come up with either A == 0 or A == 1.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
READ MEMORY BARRIERS VS LOAD SPECULATION
|
||||
----------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Many CPUs speculate with loads: that is they see that they will need to load an
|
||||
item from memory, and they find a time where they're not using the bus for any
|
||||
other loads, and so do the load in advance - even though they haven't actually
|
||||
got to that point in the instruction execution flow yet. This permits the
|
||||
actual load instruction to potentially complete immediately because the CPU
|
||||
already has the value to hand.
|
||||
|
||||
It may turn out that the CPU didn't actually need the value - perhaps because a
|
||||
branch circumvented the load - in which case it can discard the value or just
|
||||
cache it for later use.
|
||||
|
||||
Consider:
|
||||
|
||||
CPU 1 CPU 2
|
||||
======================= =======================
|
||||
LOAD B
|
||||
DIVIDE } Divide instructions generally
|
||||
DIVIDE } take a long time to perform
|
||||
LOAD A
|
||||
|
||||
Which might appear as this:
|
||||
|
||||
: : +-------+
|
||||
+-------+ | |
|
||||
--->| B->2 |------>| |
|
||||
+-------+ | CPU 2 |
|
||||
: :DIVIDE | |
|
||||
+-------+ | |
|
||||
The CPU being busy doing a ---> --->| A->0 |~~~~ | |
|
||||
division speculates on the +-------+ ~ | |
|
||||
LOAD of A : : ~ | |
|
||||
: :DIVIDE | |
|
||||
: : ~ | |
|
||||
Once the divisions are complete --> : : ~-->| |
|
||||
the CPU can then perform the : : | |
|
||||
LOAD with immediate effect : : +-------+
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Placing a read barrier or a data dependency barrier just before the second
|
||||
load:
|
||||
|
||||
CPU 1 CPU 2
|
||||
======================= =======================
|
||||
LOAD B
|
||||
DIVIDE
|
||||
DIVIDE
|
||||
<read barrier>
|
||||
LOAD A
|
||||
|
||||
will force any value speculatively obtained to be reconsidered to an extent
|
||||
dependent on the type of barrier used. If there was no change made to the
|
||||
speculated memory location, then the speculated value will just be used:
|
||||
|
||||
: : +-------+
|
||||
+-------+ | |
|
||||
--->| B->2 |------>| |
|
||||
+-------+ | CPU 2 |
|
||||
: :DIVIDE | |
|
||||
+-------+ | |
|
||||
The CPU being busy doing a ---> --->| A->0 |~~~~ | |
|
||||
division speculates on the +-------+ ~ | |
|
||||
LOAD of A : : ~ | |
|
||||
: :DIVIDE | |
|
||||
: : ~ | |
|
||||
: : ~ | |
|
||||
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr~ | |
|
||||
: : ~ | |
|
||||
: : ~-->| |
|
||||
: : | |
|
||||
: : +-------+
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
but if there was an update or an invalidation from another CPU pending, then
|
||||
the speculation will be cancelled and the value reloaded:
|
||||
|
||||
: : +-------+
|
||||
+-------+ | |
|
||||
--->| B->2 |------>| |
|
||||
+-------+ | CPU 2 |
|
||||
: :DIVIDE | |
|
||||
+-------+ | |
|
||||
The CPU being busy doing a ---> --->| A->0 |~~~~ | |
|
||||
division speculates on the +-------+ ~ | |
|
||||
LOAD of A : : ~ | |
|
||||
: :DIVIDE | |
|
||||
: : ~ | |
|
||||
: : ~ | |
|
||||
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr | |
|
||||
+-------+ | |
|
||||
The speculation is discarded ---> --->| A->1 |------>| |
|
||||
and an updated value is +-------+ | |
|
||||
retrieved : : +-------+
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
========================
|
||||
@@ -901,7 +1081,7 @@ IMPLICIT KERNEL MEMORY BARRIERS
|
||||
===============================
|
||||
|
||||
Some of the other functions in the linux kernel imply memory barriers, amongst
|
||||
which are locking, scheduling and memory allocation functions.
|
||||
which are locking and scheduling functions.
|
||||
|
||||
This specification is a _minimum_ guarantee; any particular architecture may
|
||||
provide more substantial guarantees, but these may not be relied upon outside
|
||||
@@ -966,6 +1146,20 @@ equivalent to a full barrier, but a LOCK followed by an UNLOCK is not.
|
||||
barriers is that the effects instructions outside of a critical section may
|
||||
seep into the inside of the critical section.
|
||||
|
||||
A LOCK followed by an UNLOCK may not be assumed to be full memory barrier
|
||||
because it is possible for an access preceding the LOCK to happen after the
|
||||
LOCK, and an access following the UNLOCK to happen before the UNLOCK, and the
|
||||
two accesses can themselves then cross:
|
||||
|
||||
*A = a;
|
||||
LOCK
|
||||
UNLOCK
|
||||
*B = b;
|
||||
|
||||
may occur as:
|
||||
|
||||
LOCK, STORE *B, STORE *A, UNLOCK
|
||||
|
||||
Locks and semaphores may not provide any guarantee of ordering on UP compiled
|
||||
systems, and so cannot be counted on in such a situation to actually achieve
|
||||
anything at all - especially with respect to I/O accesses - unless combined
|
||||
@@ -1016,8 +1210,6 @@ Other functions that imply barriers:
|
||||
|
||||
(*) schedule() and similar imply full memory barriers.
|
||||
|
||||
(*) Memory allocation and release functions imply full memory barriers.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
=================================
|
||||
INTER-CPU LOCKING BARRIER EFFECTS
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -214,12 +214,13 @@ hardware.
|
||||
The interaction of the iflag bits is as follows (parity error
|
||||
given as an example):
|
||||
Parity error INPCK IGNPAR
|
||||
None n/a n/a character received
|
||||
Yes n/a 0 character discarded
|
||||
Yes 0 1 character received, marked as
|
||||
n/a 0 n/a character received, marked as
|
||||
TTY_NORMAL
|
||||
Yes 1 1 character received, marked as
|
||||
None 1 n/a character received, marked as
|
||||
TTY_NORMAL
|
||||
Yes 1 0 character received, marked as
|
||||
TTY_PARITY
|
||||
Yes 1 1 character discarded
|
||||
|
||||
Other flags may be used (eg, xon/xoff characters) if your
|
||||
hardware supports hardware "soft" flow control.
|
||||
|
||||
+17
@@ -568,6 +568,18 @@ L: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
|
||||
W: http://www.penguinppc.org/ppc64/
|
||||
S: Supported
|
||||
|
||||
BROADCOM BNX2 GIGABIT ETHERNET DRIVER
|
||||
P: Michael Chan
|
||||
M: mchan@broadcom.com
|
||||
L: netdev@vger.kernel.org
|
||||
S: Supported
|
||||
|
||||
BROADCOM TG3 GIGABIT ETHERNET DRIVER
|
||||
P: Michael Chan
|
||||
M: mchan@broadcom.com
|
||||
L: netdev@vger.kernel.org
|
||||
S: Supported
|
||||
|
||||
BTTV VIDEO4LINUX DRIVER
|
||||
P: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
|
||||
M: mchehab@infradead.org
|
||||
@@ -1877,6 +1889,11 @@ L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
|
||||
W: http://www.atnf.csiro.au/~rgooch/linux/kernel-patches.html
|
||||
S: Maintained
|
||||
|
||||
MULTIMEDIA CARD SUBSYSTEM
|
||||
P: Russell King
|
||||
M: rmk+mmc@arm.linux.org.uk
|
||||
S: Maintained
|
||||
|
||||
MULTISOUND SOUND DRIVER
|
||||
P: Andrew Veliath
|
||||
M: andrewtv@usa.net
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
VERSION = 2
|
||||
PATCHLEVEL = 6
|
||||
SUBLEVEL = 17
|
||||
EXTRAVERSION =-rc5
|
||||
NAME=Lordi Rules
|
||||
EXTRAVERSION =-rc6
|
||||
NAME=Crazed Snow-Weasel
|
||||
|
||||
# *DOCUMENTATION*
|
||||
# To see a list of typical targets execute "make help"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -182,7 +182,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_num_cpus);
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function);
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_on_cpu);
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_atomic_dec_and_lock);
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_present_mask);
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ common_shutdown_1(void *generic_ptr)
|
||||
if (cpuid != boot_cpuid) {
|
||||
flags |= 0x00040000UL; /* "remain halted" */
|
||||
*pflags = flags;
|
||||
clear_bit(cpuid, &cpu_present_mask);
|
||||
cpu_clear(cpuid, cpu_present_map);
|
||||
halt();
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
@@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ common_shutdown_1(void *generic_ptr)
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
/* Wait for the secondaries to halt. */
|
||||
cpu_clear(boot_cpuid, cpu_possible_map);
|
||||
while (cpus_weight(cpu_possible_map))
|
||||
cpu_clear(boot_cpuid, cpu_present_map);
|
||||
while (cpus_weight(cpu_present_map))
|
||||
barrier();
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+4
-10
@@ -68,7 +68,6 @@ enum ipi_message_type {
|
||||
static int smp_secondary_alive __initdata = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Which cpus ids came online. */
|
||||
cpumask_t cpu_present_mask;
|
||||
cpumask_t cpu_online_map;
|
||||
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_online_map);
|
||||
@@ -439,7 +438,7 @@ setup_smp(void)
|
||||
if ((cpu->flags & 0x1cc) == 0x1cc) {
|
||||
smp_num_probed++;
|
||||
/* Assume here that "whami" == index */
|
||||
cpu_set(i, cpu_present_mask);
|
||||
cpu_set(i, cpu_present_map);
|
||||
cpu->pal_revision = boot_cpu_palrev;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -450,11 +449,10 @@ setup_smp(void)
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
smp_num_probed = 1;
|
||||
cpu_set(boot_cpuid, cpu_present_mask);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "SMP: %d CPUs probed -- cpu_present_mask = %lx\n",
|
||||
smp_num_probed, cpu_possible_map.bits[0]);
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "SMP: %d CPUs probed -- cpu_present_map = %lx\n",
|
||||
smp_num_probed, cpu_present_map.bits[0]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@@ -473,7 +471,7 @@ smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Nothing to do on a UP box, or when told not to. */
|
||||
if (smp_num_probed == 1 || max_cpus == 0) {
|
||||
cpu_present_mask = cpumask_of_cpu(boot_cpuid);
|
||||
cpu_present_map = cpumask_of_cpu(boot_cpuid);
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "SMP mode deactivated.\n");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -486,10 +484,6 @@ smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
|
||||
void __devinit
|
||||
smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Mark the boot cpu (current cpu) as online
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cpu_set(smp_processor_id(), cpu_online_map);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int __devinit
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ titan_update_irq_hw(unsigned long mask)
|
||||
register int bcpu = boot_cpuid;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
cpumask_t cpm = cpu_present_mask;
|
||||
cpumask_t cpm = cpu_present_map;
|
||||
volatile unsigned long *dim0, *dim1, *dim2, *dim3;
|
||||
unsigned long mask0, mask1, mask2, mask3, dummy;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ config DEBUG_S3C2410_UART
|
||||
help
|
||||
Choice for UART for kernel low-level using S3C2410 UARTS,
|
||||
should be between zero and two. The port must have been
|
||||
initalised by the boot-loader before use.
|
||||
initialised by the boot-loader before use.
|
||||
|
||||
The uncompressor code port configuration is now handled
|
||||
by CONFIG_S3C2410_LOWLEVEL_UART_PORT.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -111,21 +111,21 @@ static void __init ts72xx_map_io(void)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned char ts72xx_rtc_readb(unsigned long addr)
|
||||
static unsigned char ts72xx_rtc_readbyte(unsigned long addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__raw_writeb(addr, TS72XX_RTC_INDEX_VIRT_BASE);
|
||||
return __raw_readb(TS72XX_RTC_DATA_VIRT_BASE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void ts72xx_rtc_writeb(unsigned char value, unsigned long addr)
|
||||
static void ts72xx_rtc_writebyte(unsigned char value, unsigned long addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__raw_writeb(addr, TS72XX_RTC_INDEX_VIRT_BASE);
|
||||
__raw_writeb(value, TS72XX_RTC_DATA_VIRT_BASE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct m48t86_ops ts72xx_rtc_ops = {
|
||||
.readb = ts72xx_rtc_readb,
|
||||
.writeb = ts72xx_rtc_writeb,
|
||||
.readbyte = ts72xx_rtc_readbyte,
|
||||
.writebyte = ts72xx_rtc_writebyte,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static struct platform_device ts72xx_rtc_device = {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -178,8 +178,12 @@ static int ixp23xx_irq_set_type(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type)
|
||||
|
||||
static void ixp23xx_irq_mask(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
volatile unsigned long *intr_reg = IXP23XX_INTR_EN1 + (irq / 32);
|
||||
volatile unsigned long *intr_reg;
|
||||
|
||||
if (irq >= 56)
|
||||
irq += 8;
|
||||
|
||||
intr_reg = IXP23XX_INTR_EN1 + (irq / 32);
|
||||
*intr_reg &= ~(1 << (irq % 32));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -199,17 +203,25 @@ static void ixp23xx_irq_ack(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void ixp23xx_irq_level_unmask(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
volatile unsigned long *intr_reg = IXP23XX_INTR_EN1 + (irq / 32);
|
||||
volatile unsigned long *intr_reg;
|
||||
|
||||
ixp23xx_irq_ack(irq);
|
||||
|
||||
if (irq >= 56)
|
||||
irq += 8;
|
||||
|
||||
intr_reg = IXP23XX_INTR_EN1 + (irq / 32);
|
||||
*intr_reg |= (1 << (irq % 32));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void ixp23xx_irq_edge_unmask(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
volatile unsigned long *intr_reg = IXP23XX_INTR_EN1 + (irq / 32);
|
||||
volatile unsigned long *intr_reg;
|
||||
|
||||
if (irq >= 56)
|
||||
irq += 8;
|
||||
|
||||
intr_reg = IXP23XX_INTR_EN1 + (irq / 32);
|
||||
*intr_reg |= (1 << (irq % 32));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ config IXP4XX_INDIRECT_PCI
|
||||
2) If > 64MB of memory space is required, the IXP4xx can be
|
||||
configured to use indirect registers to access PCI This allows
|
||||
for up to 128MB (0x48000000 to 0x4fffffff) of memory on the bus.
|
||||
The disadvantadge of this is that every PCI access requires
|
||||
The disadvantage of this is that every PCI access requires
|
||||
three local register accesses plus a spinlock, but in some
|
||||
cases the performance hit is acceptable. In addition, you cannot
|
||||
mmap() PCI devices in this case due to the indirect nature
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -493,6 +493,7 @@ static void __init mainstone_map_io(void)
|
||||
MACHINE_START(MAINSTONE, "Intel HCDDBBVA0 Development Platform (aka Mainstone)")
|
||||
/* Maintainer: MontaVista Software Inc. */
|
||||
.phys_io = 0x40000000,
|
||||
.boot_params = 0xa0000100, /* BLOB boot parameter setting */
|
||||
.io_pg_offst = (io_p2v(0x40000000) >> 18) & 0xfffc,
|
||||
.map_io = mainstone_map_io,
|
||||
.init_irq = mainstone_init_irq,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ config S3C2410_PM_DEBUG
|
||||
depends on ARCH_S3C2410 && PM
|
||||
help
|
||||
Say Y here if you want verbose debugging from the PM Suspend and
|
||||
Resume code. See `Documentation/arm/Samsing-S3C24XX/Suspend.txt`
|
||||
Resume code. See <file:Documentation/arm/Samsung-S3C24XX/Suspend.txt>
|
||||
for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
config S3C2410_PM_CHECK
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ void __init build_mem_type_table(void)
|
||||
ecc_mask = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpu_arch <= CPU_ARCH_ARMv5TEJ) {
|
||||
if (cpu_arch <= CPU_ARCH_ARMv5TEJ && !cpu_is_xscale()) {
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mem_types); i++) {
|
||||
if (mem_types[i].prot_l1)
|
||||
mem_types[i].prot_l1 |= PMD_BIT4;
|
||||
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ void setup_mm_for_reboot(char mode)
|
||||
pgd = init_mm.pgd;
|
||||
|
||||
base_pmdval = PMD_SECT_AP_WRITE | PMD_SECT_AP_READ | PMD_TYPE_SECT;
|
||||
if (cpu_architecture() <= CPU_ARCH_ARMv5TEJ)
|
||||
if (cpu_architecture() <= CPU_ARCH_ARMv5TEJ && !cpu_is_xscale())
|
||||
base_pmdval |= PMD_BIT4;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < FIRST_USER_PGD_NR + USER_PTRS_PER_PGD; i++, pgd++) {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -427,12 +427,13 @@ __xsc3_setup:
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
mcr p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 1 @ set auxiliary control reg
|
||||
mrc p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0 @ get control register
|
||||
bic r0, r0, #0x0200 @ .... ..R. .... ....
|
||||
bic r0, r0, #0x0002 @ .... .... .... ..A.
|
||||
orr r0, r0, #0x0005 @ .... .... .... .C.M
|
||||
#if BTB_ENABLE
|
||||
bic r0, r0, #0x0200 @ .... ..R. .... ....
|
||||
orr r0, r0, #0x3900 @ ..VI Z..S .... ....
|
||||
#else
|
||||
bic r0, r0, #0x0a00 @ .... Z.R. .... ....
|
||||
orr r0, r0, #0x3100 @ ..VI ...S .... ....
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#if L2_CACHE_ENABLE
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1066,14 +1066,6 @@ static struct dmi_system_id __initdata acpi_dmi_table[] = {
|
||||
DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "TravelMate 360"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
.callback = disable_acpi_pci,
|
||||
.ident = "HP xw9300",
|
||||
.matches = {
|
||||
DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Hewlett-Packard"),
|
||||
DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "HP xw9300 Workstation"),
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,17 +5,34 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/init.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/pci.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/acpi.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include <asm/pci-direct.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/acpi.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/apic.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
|
||||
|
||||
static int nvidia_hpet_detected __initdata;
|
||||
|
||||
static int __init nvidia_hpet_check(unsigned long phys, unsigned long size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
nvidia_hpet_detected = 1;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static int __init check_bridge(int vendor, int device)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
|
||||
/* According to Nvidia all timer overrides are bogus. Just ignore
|
||||
them all. */
|
||||
/* According to Nvidia all timer overrides are bogus unless HPET
|
||||
is enabled. */
|
||||
if (vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA) {
|
||||
acpi_skip_timer_override = 1;
|
||||
nvidia_hpet_detected = 0;
|
||||
acpi_table_parse(ACPI_HPET, nvidia_hpet_check);
|
||||
if (nvidia_hpet_detected == 0) {
|
||||
acpi_skip_timer_override = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
if (vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI && timer_over_8254 == 1) {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1547,15 +1547,18 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
|
||||
if (efi_enabled)
|
||||
efi_map_memmap();
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
|
||||
check_acpi_pci(); /* Checks more than just ACPI actually */
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Parse the ACPI tables for possible boot-time SMP configuration.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
acpi_boot_table_init();
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
|
||||
check_acpi_pci(); /* Checks more than just ACPI actually */
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
|
||||
acpi_boot_init();
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_X86_PC)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -93,9 +93,11 @@ int __init mps_oem_check(struct mp_config_table *mpc, char *oem, char *productid
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
for (i = 0; apic_probe[i]; ++i) {
|
||||
if (apic_probe[i]->mps_oem_check(mpc,oem,productid)) {
|
||||
genapic = apic_probe[i];
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "Switched to APIC driver `%s'.\n",
|
||||
genapic->name);
|
||||
if (!cmdline_apic) {
|
||||
genapic = apic_probe[i];
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "Switched to APIC driver `%s'.\n",
|
||||
genapic->name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -107,9 +109,11 @@ int __init acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
for (i = 0; apic_probe[i]; ++i) {
|
||||
if (apic_probe[i]->acpi_madt_oem_check(oem_id, oem_table_id)) {
|
||||
genapic = apic_probe[i];
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "Switched to APIC driver `%s'.\n",
|
||||
genapic->name);
|
||||
if (!cmdline_apic) {
|
||||
genapic = apic_probe[i];
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "Switched to APIC driver `%s'.\n",
|
||||
genapic->name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More
Reference in New Issue
Block a user