You've already forked linux-apfs
mirror of
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs.git
synced 2026-05-01 15:00:59 -07:00
serial: replace the state mutex with the tty port mutex
They cover essentially the same stuff and we can therefore fold it into the tty_port one. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1645,7 +1645,7 @@ static int pmz_suspend(struct macio_dev *mdev, pm_message_t pm_state)
|
||||
state = pmz_uart_reg.state + uap->port.line;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&pmz_irq_mutex);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&state->mutex);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&state->port.mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&uap->port.lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1676,7 +1676,7 @@ static int pmz_suspend(struct macio_dev *mdev, pm_message_t pm_state)
|
||||
/* Shut the chip down */
|
||||
pmz_set_scc_power(uap, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&state->mutex);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&state->port.mutex);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&pmz_irq_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
pmz_debug("suspend, switching complete\n");
|
||||
@@ -1705,7 +1705,7 @@ static int pmz_resume(struct macio_dev *mdev)
|
||||
state = pmz_uart_reg.state + uap->port.line;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&pmz_irq_mutex);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&state->mutex);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&state->port.mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&uap->port.lock, flags);
|
||||
if (!ZS_IS_OPEN(uap) && !ZS_IS_CONS(uap)) {
|
||||
@@ -1737,7 +1737,7 @@ static int pmz_resume(struct macio_dev *mdev)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bail:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&state->mutex);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&state->port.mutex);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&pmz_irq_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Right now, we deal with delay by blocking here, I'll be
|
||||
|
||||
+119
-108
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -351,8 +351,6 @@ struct uart_state {
|
||||
struct tasklet_struct tlet;
|
||||
wait_queue_head_t delta_msr_wait;
|
||||
struct uart_port *uart_port;
|
||||
|
||||
struct mutex mutex;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#define UART_XMIT_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user