You've already forked linux-apfs
mirror of
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs.git
synced 2026-05-01 15:00:59 -07:00
net: small bug on rxhash calculation
In the current rxhash calculation function, while the
sorting of the ports/addrs is coherent (you get the
same rxhash for packets sharing the same 4-tuple, in
both directions), ports and addrs are sorted
independently. This implies packets from a connection
between the same addresses but crossed ports hash to
the same rxhash.
For example, traffic between A=S:l and B=L:s is hashed
(in both directions) from {L, S, {s, l}}. The same
rxhash is obtained for packets between C=S:s and D=L:l.
This patch ensures that you either swap both addrs and ports,
or you swap none. Traffic between A and B, and traffic
between C and D, get their rxhash from different sources
({L, S, {l, s}} for A<->B, and {L, S, {s, l}} for C<->D)
The patch is co-written with Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Chema Gonzalez <chema@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
David S. Miller
parent
777bf135b7
commit
6862234238
+6
-5
@@ -2647,15 +2647,16 @@ void __skb_get_rxhash(struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
if (!skb_flow_dissect(skb, &keys))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (keys.ports) {
|
||||
if ((__force u16)keys.port16[1] < (__force u16)keys.port16[0])
|
||||
swap(keys.port16[0], keys.port16[1]);
|
||||
if (keys.ports)
|
||||
skb->l4_rxhash = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* get a consistent hash (same value on both flow directions) */
|
||||
if ((__force u32)keys.dst < (__force u32)keys.src)
|
||||
if (((__force u32)keys.dst < (__force u32)keys.src) ||
|
||||
(((__force u32)keys.dst == (__force u32)keys.src) &&
|
||||
((__force u16)keys.port16[1] < (__force u16)keys.port16[0]))) {
|
||||
swap(keys.dst, keys.src);
|
||||
swap(keys.port16[0], keys.port16[1]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
hash = jhash_3words((__force u32)keys.dst,
|
||||
(__force u32)keys.src,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user