You've already forked linux-apfs
mirror of
https://github.com/linux-apfs/linux-apfs.git
synced 2026-05-01 15:00:59 -07:00
staging: lustre: coding style fixes found by checkpatch.pl
The patch removes "WARNING: Prefer using '"%s...", __func__' to using 'xxxxxxxx', this function's name, in a string" warnings reported by checkpatch.pl script. Signed-off-by: Simo Koskinen <koskisoft@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
db3edb1341
commit
0e0594edd8
@@ -2936,7 +2936,7 @@ failed:
|
||||
net_failed:
|
||||
kiblnd_shutdown(ni);
|
||||
|
||||
CDEBUG(D_NET, "kiblnd_startup failed\n");
|
||||
CDEBUG(D_NET, "%s failed\n", __func__);
|
||||
return -ENETDOWN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2034,7 +2034,7 @@ LNetPut(lnet_nid_t self, struct lnet_handle_md mdh, enum lnet_ack_req ack,
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
CDEBUG(D_NET, "LNetPut -> %s\n", libcfs_id2str(target));
|
||||
CDEBUG(D_NET, "%s -> %s\n", __func__, libcfs_id2str(target));
|
||||
|
||||
lnet_msg_attach_md(msg, md, 0, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2239,7 +2239,7 @@ LNetGet(lnet_nid_t self, struct lnet_handle_md mdh,
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
CDEBUG(D_NET, "LNetGet -> %s\n", libcfs_id2str(target));
|
||||
CDEBUG(D_NET, "%s -> %s\n", __func__, libcfs_id2str(target));
|
||||
|
||||
lnet_msg_attach_md(msg, md, 0, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ ldlm_flocks_overlap(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct ldlm_lock *new)
|
||||
static inline void
|
||||
ldlm_flock_destroy(struct ldlm_lock *lock, enum ldlm_mode mode, __u64 flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "ldlm_flock_destroy(mode: %d, flags: 0x%llx)",
|
||||
mode, flags);
|
||||
LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "%s(mode: %d, flags: 0x%llx)",
|
||||
__func__, mode, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Safe to not lock here, since it should be empty anyway */
|
||||
LASSERT(hlist_unhashed(&lock->l_exp_flock_hash));
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ int ldlm_init(void)
|
||||
void ldlm_exit(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (ldlm_refcount)
|
||||
CERROR("ldlm_refcount is %d in ldlm_exit!\n", ldlm_refcount);
|
||||
CERROR("ldlm_refcount is %d in %s!\n", ldlm_refcount, __func__);
|
||||
kmem_cache_destroy(ldlm_resource_slab);
|
||||
/* ldlm_lock_put() use RCU to call ldlm_lock_free, so need call
|
||||
* synchronize_rcu() to wait a grace period elapsed, so that
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ int ldlm_cli_cancel_list(struct list_head *cancels, int count,
|
||||
|
||||
if (res < 0) {
|
||||
CDEBUG_LIMIT(res == -ESHUTDOWN ? D_DLMTRACE : D_ERROR,
|
||||
"ldlm_cli_cancel_list: %d\n", res);
|
||||
"%s: %d\n", __func__, res);
|
||||
res = count;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -264,8 +264,8 @@ static void lov_lock_cancel(const struct lu_env *env,
|
||||
cl_lock_cancel(subenv->lse_env, sublock);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
CL_LOCK_DEBUG(D_ERROR, env, slice->cls_lock,
|
||||
"lov_lock_cancel fails with %ld.\n",
|
||||
PTR_ERR(subenv));
|
||||
"%s fails with %ld.\n",
|
||||
__func__, PTR_ERR(subenv));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1409,9 +1409,9 @@ void lu_context_key_degister(struct lu_context_key *key)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
while (atomic_read(&key->lct_used) > 1) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lu_keys_guard);
|
||||
CDEBUG(D_INFO, "lu_context_key_degister: \"%s\" %p, %d\n",
|
||||
key->lct_owner ? key->lct_owner->name : "", key,
|
||||
atomic_read(&key->lct_used));
|
||||
CDEBUG(D_INFO, "%s: \"%s\" %p, %d\n",
|
||||
__func__, key->lct_owner ? key->lct_owner->name : "",
|
||||
key, atomic_read(&key->lct_used));
|
||||
schedule();
|
||||
spin_lock(&lu_keys_guard);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1548,7 +1548,8 @@ void lu_context_key_quiesce(struct lu_context_key *key)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
while (atomic_read(&lu_key_initing_cnt) > 0) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lu_keys_guard);
|
||||
CDEBUG(D_INFO, "lu_context_key_quiesce: \"%s\" %p, %d (%d)\n",
|
||||
CDEBUG(D_INFO, "%s: \"%s\" %p, %d (%d)\n",
|
||||
__func__,
|
||||
key->lct_owner ? key->lct_owner->name : "",
|
||||
key, atomic_read(&key->lct_used),
|
||||
atomic_read(&lu_key_initing_cnt));
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user