Create a test (+ helper program) that opens as many unlinked files as it
possibly can on the scratch filesystem, then closes all the files at
once to stress-test unlinked file cleanup. Add an xfs-specific test to
make sure that the fallback code doesn't bitrot.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
XFS had a use-after-free bug when xfs_xattr_put_listent runs out of
listxattr buffer space while trying to store the name
"system.posix_acl_access" and then corrupts memory by not checking
the seen_enough state and then trying to shove
"trusted.SGI_ACL_FILE" into the buffer as well.
In order to tickle the bug in a user visible way we must have
already put a name in the buffer, so we take advantage of the fact
that "security.evm" sorts before "system.posix_acl_access" to make
sure this happens.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
If statx returns inode creation time (aka btime), check it to make
sure that the filesystem is setting a creation time that's
reasonably close to when it creates a file.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test that after a combination of file renames, linking and creating
a new file with the old name of a renamed file, if we fsync the new
file, after a power failure we are able to mount the filesystem and
all file names correspond to the correct inodes.
This test is motivated by a bug found in btrfs, which is fixed by
applying the following two patches to the linux kernel:
"[PATCH 1/2] Btrfs: fix fsync after succession of renames of different files"
"[PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: fix fsync after succession of renames and unlink/rmdir"
The test passes on ext4, xfs and patched btrfs, however at least in
a 5.0-rc5 linux kernel, it fails on f2fs.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test that after a combination of file renames, linking and creating
a new file with the old name of a renamed file, if we fsync the new
file, after a power failure we are able to mount the filesystem and
all file names correspond to the correct inodes.
This test is motivated by a bug found in btrfs which is fixed by a
patch for the linux kernel titled:
"Btrfs: fix fsync after succession of renames of different files"
The test passes on ext4, xfs and patched btrfs, however at least in
a 5.0-rc5 linux kernel, it fails on f2fs.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
This is a variant of test generic/466 for filesystems that
do not support mkfs_sized
It is needed for testing high-offset reads and writes with overlayfs
over a basefs that supports huge files.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
XFS has a bug where page writeback can end up sending data to the
wrong location due to a stale, cached file mapping. Add a test to
trigger this problem by racing background writeback with a
truncate/rewrite of the final page of the file.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Eric Sandeen recently found a bug in xfs_repair that flagged extended
attribute names containing "/" as corrupt and purged them. There's
nothing in the IRIX or Linux manuals that say anything about slashes not
being allowed (and Linux certainly allows this) so let's make sure this
continues to work.
[Eryu: use $SETFATTR and _getfattr helper]
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
This patch aims to add more tests to the xfstest suite to check
whether the target file system recovers correctly after a crash.
These test cases are generated by CrashMonkey, a
crash-consistency testing framework built at the SASLab at UT Austin.
This patch batches 37 crash-consistency tests into a xfstest test,
each of which checks the hard link behavior under different scenarios.
This test creates hard-links between files in the same directory or
across directories, while allowing fsync of either the files involved,
their parent directories, or unrelated sibling files. After each sub
test, the metadata of the persisted file is checked for the correct
link count. Additionally, each sub test is followed by fsck to check
for inconsistencies. The tests run on a 256MB file system, and
the working directory is cleaned up after every sub test.
Signed-off-by: Jayashree Mohan <jaya@cs.utexas.edu>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
xfstests doesn't cover FIBMAP test, it cause we brought in a
regression bug fixed by "79b3dbe4adb3 fs: fix iomap_bmap position
calculation".
Although FIBMAP is old, there're still some programs use it, likes
LILO. This case tests if there's physical address overlap returned
by FIBMAP.
Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test that we can not clone a range from a file A into the middle of a file B
when the range includes the last block of file A and file A's size is not
aligned with the filesystem's block size. Allowing such case would lead to
data corruption since the data between EOF and the end of its block is
undefined.
This is motivated by a bug recently found that affects both Btrfs and XFS
and is fixed by the following commits/patches for the linux kernel:
07d19dc9fbe9 ("vfs: avoid problematic remapping requests into partial EOF block")
b39989009bdb ("xfs: fix data corruption w/ unaligned reflink ranges")
Btrfs: fix data corruption due to cloning of eof block
The VFS patch landed in kernel 4.20-rc1 and the XFS patch landed in 4.19.
The Btrfs fix is very recent and it is not yet in Linus' tree.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test that deduplication of an entire file that has a size that is not
aligned to the filesystem's block size into the middle of a different
file does not corrupt the destination's file data by reflinking the last
(eof) block.
This test is motivated by a bug recently found that affects both Btrfs
and XFS, and is fixed by the following commits/patches for the linux
kernel:
07d19dc9fbe9 ("vfs: avoid problematic remapping requests into partial EOF block")
dceeb47b0ed6 ("xfs: fix data corruption w/ unaligned dedupe ranges")
de02b9f6bb65 ("Btrfs: fix data corruption when deduplicating between different files")
Btrfs: fix infinite loop on inode eviction after deduplication of eof block
The VFS patch was added to kernel 4.20-rc1 and the XFS and first Btrfs
patches were added to kernel 4.19. The second patch for Btrfs is very
recent and it is not yet in Linus' tree.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Some tests that use dmflakey to test filesystem consistency after a power
failure are in the 'log' group while others are not. So fix the
incosistency and put them all under the 'log' group.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test that ctime gets updated and suid is cleared when we reflink.
Ensure we can't reflink about RLIMIT_FSIZE. Ensure that we can't
expose stale preallocation block data when reflinking above EOF.
Make sure dedupe actually catches a single different byte.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test that if we have a very small file, with a size smaller than the
block size, then fallocate a very small range within the block size
but past the file's current size, fsync the file and then power
fail, after mounting the filesystem all the file data is there and
the file size is correct.
This test is motivated by a failure in btrfs where it triggered an
assertion when using the no-holes feature, that is, when running
with MKFS_OPTIONS="-O no-holes". The btrfs issue is fixed by a patch
for the linux kernel titled:
"Btrfs: fix assertion on fsync of regular file when using no-holes
feature"
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Add Brian Foster's alternate reproducer code for the mread-after-eof
problem so that we increase the chances that either this or generic/499
will catch the problem.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test that if we move a file from a directory B to a directory A, replace
directory B with directory A, fsync the file and then power fail, after
mounting the filesystem the file has a single parent, named B and there
is no longer any directory with the name A.
This test is motivated by a bug found in btrfs which is fixed by a patch
for the linux kernel titled:
"Btrfs: fix wrong dentries after fsync of file that got its parent
replaced"
This test passes on ext4, xfs and patched btrfs but it hangs on f2fs (the
fsck.f2fs process seems stuck).
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Test that if we fsync a tmpfile, without adding a hard link to it, and
then power fail, we will be able to mount the filesystem without
triggering any crashes, warnings or corruptions.
This test is motivated by an issue in btrfs where this scenario triggered
a warning (without any side effects). The following linux kernel patch
fixes the issue in btrfs:
"Btrfs: fix warning when replaying log after fsync of a tmpfile"
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
After fsync, filesystem should guarantee inode metadata including
creation time being persisted, so even after sudden power-cut, during
mount, we should recover i_crtime_{,nsec} fields correctly, in order
to not loss those meta info.
So adding this testcase to check whether generic filesystem can
guarantee that.
Note that, it needs inode creation time support on specified filesystem.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
After fsync, filesystem should guarantee inode metadata including
i_flags being persisted, so even after sudden power-cut, during
mount, we should recover i_flags fields correctly, in order to not
loss those meta info.
So adding this testcase to check whether generic filesystem can
guarantee that.
We only check below attribute modification which most filesystem
supports:
- no atime updates (A)
- secure deletion (s)
- synchronous updates (S)
- undeletable (u)
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
After fsync, filesystem should guarantee inode metadata including
project id being persisted, so even after sudden power-cut, during
mount, we should recover project_id fields correctly, in order to
not loss those meta info.
So adding this testcase to check whether generic filesystem can
guarantee that.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
After fsync, filesystem should guarantee inode metadata including
uid/gid being persisted, so even after sudden power-cut, durign
mount, we should recover uid/gid fields correctly, in order to not
loss those meta info.
So adding this testcase to check whether generic filesystem can
guarantee that.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>