Add a test for testing all 3 (user, group and project) quotas together.
This is a modified version of xfstest 050.
Signed-off-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
This is to test whether snapshot-aware defrag can work well on partial extents.
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
This test failed for me with output from 'btrfs balance':
QA output created by 003
+Done, had to relocate 4 out of 4 chunks
+Done, had to relocate 5 out of 5 chunks
Silence is golden
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
This commit adds the possibility to specify RESULT_BASE directory from
the config file, or with environment variable. The default remains the
same "$here/results/".
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Move configuration initialization into a function so we can re-read it
without the need to reinclude the common/config file which would be
ugly. This is in preparation for adding support for sections into config
files.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Move configuration checks into separate function to allow us to recheck
the options without the need to reinclude the whole source file which is
ugly. We still run the check on include.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Currently we do not export some of the important variables in
common/config. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
After applied this commit (864688d3), xfstests #255 will not test a
file system that cannot support fallocate(2), such as a indirect-based
file in ext4. So we need to add a new generic test case to test it.
The difference between #255 and this test case is only to use pwrite to
allocate blocks. Other filesystems should survive in this test case.
In the mean time, a new argument '-u' is added into _test_generic_punch
not to run unwritten tests.
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: xfstests: make the scratch device for generic/256 slightly larger
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:17:18 -0000
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
X-Patchwork-Id: 5816
Message-Id: <1372792638-23957-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
This is similar to a previous fix I sent. 1 gig makes us do mixed file block
groups for btrfs, so these enospc tests will usually fail because we don't have
space for metadata, which is the case for this test. So jack the size up to
1.5gig so that btrfs can do its normal thing and pass the test. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
If multiple mount options are given with multiple -o parameters,
_mount_ops_filter concatenates them by replacing all -o's with a comma
(except for the first -o).
If $TEST_DIR contains "-o" (e.g. /mnt/test-os/) you get errors like this:
# ./check generic/002
mount: mount point /mnt/test,s/ does not exist
common/rc: retrying test device mount with external set
mount: mount point /mnt/test,s/ does not exist
common/rc: could not mount /dev/sdc3 on /mnt/test-os/
Fix it by only replacing -o's that are preceded by at least one space.
Signed-off-by: Koen De Wit <koen.de.wit@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
We were allowing users to delete their default subvolume, which is problematic.
This test is a regression test to make sure we don't let that happen in the
future. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
[rjohnston: renumbered test from 003 to 009]
This is a regression test for a problem we had where we'd assume we had created
a directory if it only had subvols inside of it. This was happening because
subvols would have lower inode numbers than our current send progress because
their inode numbers are based off of a different counter. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
[rjohnston: renumbered test from 002 to 008]
Basic send / receive functionality test for btrfs. Requires current
version of fsstress built (-x support). Relies on fssum tool but can
skip the test if it failed to build.
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.xfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
[rjohnston: renumbered test from 316 to 007]
fssum is a tool to build a recursive checksum for a file system. The home
repository of fssum is
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arne/far-progs.git
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.xfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
Current numbering is inheried from the single testsuite series. There
are only 6 btrfs-specific tests and it makes more sense to start adding
new ones at a more natural place than 300-something. There's no overlap
with the old and new numbers and I hope there' will be no confusion when
referencing them.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
So df in btrfs is tricky at best, and relying on it for accurate information is
not great, but it's the best way to verify this test. To get around btrfs being
inconsistent sometimes just use _within_tolerance to check our new df value to
make sure that our truncate did something. With this patch I no longer see
transient failures of this test. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
ls -l will show the nblocks for the directory, and this made it into the golden
output for 314. The problem is nblocks is 0 for btrfs directories because we're
awesome, which makes us fail this test. So filter out the "total blah" line of
ls -l so btrfs can pass this test too. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
This reverts commit 74bcf51c06.
Unfortunately this commit causes dmapi tests to be run on systems which
don't have dmapi installed, so they fail.
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Introduce generic test 315 to verify if the disk space is
released after truncating a preallocated file back to the
old smaller size. Before Linux-3.10, Btrfs/OCFS2 test
failed in this case.
The test file is fallocated with FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE option.
Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Cleanup 'remake' related matters from the README file as the
remake utility has already been removed by:
commit 609d17c4eb
xfstests: remove remake script
Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Test generic/192 fails if noatime is set
generic/192
-delta1 - access time after sleep in-core: 40
-delta2 - access time after sleep on-disk: 40
+delta1 - access time after sleep in-core: 0
+delta2 - access time after sleep on-disk: 0
but it's pointless to test atime effects with noatime.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Chandra Seetharaman
Liu Bo
Stefan Behrens
Dwight Engen
Lukas Czerner
Zheng Liu
Josef Bacik
Koen De Wit
Jan Schmidt
David Sterba
Ben Myers
Jie Liu