Otherwise we may create nodes of different dimensions than the ones we
are replacing.
"count" is the number of components of the source deref (without
considering the swizzle), while "instr_component_count" is the actual
number of components of the instruction to be replaced.
Because of the change introduced in
f21693b2 vkd3d-shader/hlsl: Use reg_size as component count when allocating a single register.
SM1 scalars and vectors were not longer getting the correct writemask
when they are allocated.
This happened because they have to reserve the whole register even if
they only use some of its components, so their reg_size may differ from
the number of components.
This commit fixes that.
Co-authored-by: Francisco Casas <fcasas@codeweavers.com>
Co-authored-by: Zebediah Figura <zfigura@codeweavers.com>
Because copy_propagation_transform_object_load() replaces a deref
instead of an instruction, it is currently prone to two problems:
1- It can replace a deref with the same deref, returning true every
time and getting the compilation stuck in an endless loop of
copy-propagation iterations.
2- When performed multiple times in the same deref, the second time it
can replace the deref with a deref from a temp that is only valid in
another point of the program execution, resulting in an incorrect value.
This patch preempts this by avoiding replacing derefs when the new deref
doesn't point to a uniform variable. Because, uniform variables cannot
be written to.
If a hlsl_ir_load loads a variable whose components are stored from different
instructions, copy propagation doesn't replace it.
But if all these instructions are constants (which currently is the case
for value constructors), the load could be replaced with a constant value.
Which is expected in some other instructions, e.g. texel_offsets when
using aoffimmi modifiers.
For instance, this shader:
```
sampler s;
Texture2D t;
float4 main() : sv_target
{
return t.Gather(s, float2(0.6, 0.6), int2(0, 0));
}
```
results in the following IR before applying the patch:
```
float | 6.00000024e-01
float | 6.00000024e-01
uint | 0
| = (<constructor-2>[@4].x @2)
uint | 1
| = (<constructor-2>[@6].x @3)
float2 | <constructor-2>
int | 0
int | 0
uint | 0
| = (<constructor-5>[@11].x @9)
uint | 1
| = (<constructor-5>[@13].x @10)
int2 | <constructor-5>
float4 | gather_red(resource = t, sampler = s, coords = @8, offset = @15)
| return
| = (<output-sv_target0> @16)
```
and this IR afterwards:
```
float2 | {6.00000024e-01 6.00000024e-01 }
int2 | {0 0 }
float4 | gather_red(resource = t, sampler = s, coords = @2, offset = @3)
| return
| = (<output-sv_target0> @4)
```
Rename it to copy_propagation_replace_with_single_instr() accordingly.
The idea is to introduce a constant vector replacement pass which will do the
same thing.
copy_propagation_compute_replacement() is not doing very much for us, and
conceptually is a bit of an odd fit anyway, since it's meant to deal with
multi-component types.
Note that in the future we should call
validate_static_object_references() after DCE and pruning branches,
because shaders such as these compile (at least in more modern versions
of the native compiler):
Branch pruning:
```
static RWTexture2D<float> tex;
float4 main() : sv_target
{
if (0)
{
tex[int2(0, 0)] = 2;
}
return 0;
}
```
DCE:
```
static Texture2D tex;
uniform uint i;
float4 main() : sv_target
{
float4 unused = tex.Load(int3(0, 1, 2));
return 0;
}
```
These are "todo" tests in hlsl-static-initializer.shader_test
that depend on this.
Otherwise, for instance, the added test results in:
debug_hlsl_writemask: Assertion `!(writemask & ~VKD3DSP_WRITEMASK_ALL)' failed.
Which happens in allocate_variable_temp_register() when the variable's
type reg_size is <= 4 but its component count is larger, which may
happen if it contains objects.
This should silence warnings about some branches non returning any value
without requiring additional "return 0" statement or similar.
Also, in theory this might enable to compiler to optimize the program
a little bit more, though that's unlikely to have any measurable effect.
It is responsibility of the shader's programmer to ensure that
object references can be solved statically.
Resource arrays for ps_5_1 and vs_5_1 are an exception which is not
properly handled yet. They probably deserve a different object type.
Signed-off-by: Francisco Casas <fcasas@codeweavers.com>
