mirror of
https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine-gecko.git
synced 2024-09-13 09:24:08 -07:00
109 lines
5.4 KiB
ReStructuredText
109 lines
5.4 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. _build_overview:
|
|
|
|
=====================
|
|
Build System Overview
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
This document provides an overview on how the build system works. It is
|
|
targeted at people wanting to learn about internals of the build system.
|
|
It is not meant for persons who casually interact with the build system.
|
|
That being said, knowledge empowers, so consider reading on.
|
|
|
|
The build system is composed of many different components working in
|
|
harmony to build the source tree. We begin with a graphic overview.
|
|
|
|
.. graphviz::
|
|
|
|
digraph build_components {
|
|
rankdir="LR";
|
|
"configure" -> "config.status" -> "build backend" -> "build output"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Phase 1: Configuration
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
Phase 1 centers around the configure script, which is a bash shell script.
|
|
The file is generated from a file called configure.in which is written in M4
|
|
and processed using Autoconf 2.13 to create the final configure script.
|
|
You don't have to worry about how you obtain a configure file: the build system
|
|
does this for you.
|
|
|
|
The primary job of configure is to determine characteristics of the system and
|
|
compiler, apply options passed into it, and validate everything looks OK to
|
|
build. The primary output of the configure script is an executable file in the
|
|
object directory called config.status. configure also produces some additional
|
|
files (like autoconf.mk). However, the most important file in terms of
|
|
architecture is config.status.
|
|
|
|
The existence of a config.status file may be familiar to those who have worked
|
|
with Autoconf before. However, Mozilla's config.status is different from almost
|
|
any other config.status you've ever seen: it's written in Python! Instead of
|
|
having our configure script produce a shell script, we have it generating Python.
|
|
|
|
Now is as good a time as any to mention that Python is prevalent in our build
|
|
system. If we need to write code for the build system, we do it in Python.
|
|
That's just how we roll.
|
|
|
|
config.status contains 2 parts: data structures representing the output of
|
|
configure and a command-line interface for preparing/configuring/generating
|
|
an appropriate build backend. (A build backend is merely a tool used to build
|
|
the tree - like GNU Make or Tup). These data structures essentially describe
|
|
the current state of the system and what the existing build configuration looks
|
|
like. For example, it defines which compiler to use, how to invoke it, which
|
|
application features are enabled, etc. You are encouraged to open up
|
|
config.status to have a look for yourself!
|
|
|
|
Once we have emitted a config.status file, we pass into the realm of phase 2.
|
|
|
|
Phase 2: Build Backend Preparation and the Build Definition
|
|
===========================================================
|
|
|
|
Once configure has determined what the current build configuration is, we need
|
|
to apply this to the source tree so we can actually build.
|
|
|
|
What essentially happens is the automatically-produced config.status Python
|
|
script is executed as soon as configure has generated it. config.status is charged
|
|
with the task of tell a tool had to build the tree. To do this, config.status
|
|
must first scan the build system definition.
|
|
|
|
The build system definition consists of various moz.build files in the tree.
|
|
There is roughly one moz.build file per directory or pet set of related directories.
|
|
Each moz.build files defines how its part of the build config works. For example it
|
|
says I want these C++ files compiled or look for additional information in these
|
|
directories. config.status starts with the main moz.build file and then recurses
|
|
into all referenced files and directories. As the moz.build files are read, data
|
|
structures describing the overall build system definition are emitted. These data
|
|
structures are then read by a build backend generator which then converts them
|
|
into files, function calls, etc. In the case of a `make` backend, the generator
|
|
writes out Makefiles.
|
|
|
|
When config.status runs, you'll see the following output::
|
|
|
|
Reticulating splines...
|
|
Finished reading 1096 moz.build files into 1276 descriptors in 2.40s
|
|
Backend executed in 2.39s
|
|
2188 total backend files. 0 created; 1 updated; 2187 unchanged
|
|
Total wall time: 5.03s; CPU time: 3.79s; Efficiency: 75%
|
|
|
|
What this is saying is that a total of 1096 moz.build files were read. Altogether,
|
|
1276 data structures describing the build configuration were derived from them.
|
|
It took 2.40s wall time to just read these files and produce the data structures.
|
|
The 1276 data structures were fed into the build backend which then determined it
|
|
had to manage 2188 files derived from those data structures. Most of them
|
|
already existed and didn't need changed. However, 1 was updated as a result of
|
|
the new configuration. The whole process took 5.03s. Although, only 3.79s was in
|
|
CPU time. That likely means we spent roughly 25% of the time waiting on I/O.
|
|
|
|
Phase 3: Invokation of the Build Backend
|
|
========================================
|
|
|
|
When most people think of the build system, they think of phase 3. This is
|
|
where we take all the code in the tree and produce Firefox or whatever
|
|
application you are creating. Phase 3 effectively takes whatever was
|
|
generated by phase 2 and runs it. Since the dawn of Mozilla, this has been
|
|
make consuming Makefiles. However, with the transition to moz.build files,
|
|
you may soon see non-Make build backends, such as Tup or Visual Studio.
|
|
|
|
When building the tree, most of the time is spent in phase 3. This is when
|
|
header files are installed, C++ files are compiled, files are preprocessed, etc.
|