gecko/content/xbl/test/file_bug372769.xhtml
Bobby Holley d03867df1d Bug 857356 - Convert field-y XBL tests to run with dom.use_xbl_scopes_for_remote_xul=false. r=bz
There are a couple of tests here that do funny things with fields. Our basic
position here is that fields have no place for in-content XBL bindings, but
there's still value in testing this stuff given our heavy usage of XBL in
chrome code. They really should be converted to chrome tests, but I was having
trouble doing that, so I decided to convert them to run without XBL scopes, like
we do for remote XUL.

As a nice side effect, this gives us a tiny bit more test coverage for the
remote XUL configuration.

--HG--
rename : content/xbl/test/test_bug372769.xhtml => content/xbl/test/file_bug372769.xhtml
rename : content/xbl/test/test_bug397934.xhtml => content/xbl/test/file_bug397934.xhtml
2013-05-09 09:16:02 -07:00

182 lines
5.5 KiB
HTML

<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<!--
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372769
-->
<head>
<title>Test for Bug 372769</title>
<bindings xmlns="http://www.mozilla.org/xbl">
<binding id="test1">
<implementation>
<field name="one">1</field>
<field name="two">9</field>
<field name="three">3</field>
<field name="four">10</field>
<field name="five">11</field>
<field name="six">this.four = 4; 6;</field>
<field name="seven">this.five = 5; 7;</field>
</implementation>
</binding>
<binding id="test2">
<implementation>
<!-- Tests for recursive resolves -->
<field name="eight">this.eight</field>
<field name="nine">this.ten</field>
<field name="ten">this.nine</field>
<!-- Tests for non-DOM overrides -->
<field name="eleven">11</field>
<field name="twelve">12</field>
<!-- Tests for DOM overrides -->
<field name="parentNode">this.parentNode</field>
<field name="ownerDocument">"ownerDocument override"</field>
</implementation>
</binding>
<binding id="test3-ancestor">
<implementation>
<field name="thirteen">"13 ancestor"</field>
<field name="fourteen">"14 ancestor"</field>
<property name="fifteen" readonly="true" onget="return '15 ancestor'"/>
</implementation>
</binding>
<binding id="test3" extends="#test3-ancestor">
<implementation>
<field name="thirteen">13</field>
<field name="fifteen">15</field>
<field name="sixteen">16</field>
<field name="sixteen">"16 later"</field>
<field name="seventeen">17</field>
<field name="eighteen">"18 field"</field>
<property name="eighteen" readonly="true" onget="return 18"/>
<property name="nineteen" readonly="true" onget="return 19"/>
<field name="nineteen">"19 field"</field>
</implementation>
</binding>
<binding id="test4">
<implementation>
<field name="twenty">for (var i in this) ; 20;</field>
</implementation>
</binding>
<binding id="test5">
<implementation>
<field name="twenty-one">for (var i in this) ; 21;</field>
</implementation>
</binding>
</bindings>
</head>
<body>
<a target="_blank" href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372769">Mozilla Bug 372769</a>
<p id="display1" style="-moz-binding: url(#test1)"></p>
<p id="display2" style="-moz-binding: url(#test2)"></p>
<p id="display3" style="-moz-binding: url(#test3)"></p>
<p id="display4" style="-moz-binding: url(#test4)"></p>
<p id="display5" style="-moz-binding: url(#test5)"></p>
<div id="content" style="display: none">
</div>
<pre id="test">
<script class="testbody" type="text/javascript">
<![CDATA[
/** Test for Bug 372769 **/
SimpleTest = parent.SimpleTest;
ok = parent.ok;
is = parent.is;
$ = function(x) { return document.getElementById(x); }
window.onload = function() {
var d = $("display1");
is(d.one, 1, "Should be able to read field");
d.two = 2;
is(d.two, 2, "Should be able to write field");
is("three" in d, true, 'Should have a property named "three"');
is(d.three, 3, "Should be 3");
is(d.four, 10, "Unexpected value so far");
// Save "five" for now
is(d.six, 6, "Should be 6");
is(d.four, 4, "Now should be 4");
d.four = 9;
is(d.four, 9, "Just set it to 9");
var found = false;
for (var prop in d) {
if (prop == "seven") {
found = true;
break;
}
}
is(found, true, "Enumeration is broken");
is(d.four, 9, "Shouldn't have rerun field six");
is(d.five, 11, "Shouldn't have run field 7");
is(d.seven, 7, "Should be 7")
is(d.five, 5, "Should have run field 7");
d = $("display2");
is(typeof(d.eight), "undefined", "Recursive resolve should bail out");
is(typeof(d.nine), "undefined", "Recursive double resolve should bail out");
is(typeof(d.ten), "undefined",
"This recursive double resolve should bail out too");
// Get .eleven so it's resolved now
is(d.eleven, 11, "Unexpected value for .eleven");
var newProto = {};
newProto.eleven = "Proto 11";
newProto.twelve = "Proto 12";
newProto.__proto__ = d.__proto__;
d.__proto__ = newProto;
is(d.eleven, 11, "Proto should not have affected this");
is(d.twelve, "Proto 12", "Proto should have overridden 'twelve'");
is(d.parentNode, undefined, "We overrode this, yes we did");
is(typeof(d.parentNode), "undefined", "This is a recursive resolve too");
is(d.ownerDocument, "ownerDocument override",
"Should have overridden ownerDocument");
d = $("display3");
is(d.thirteen, 13, "descendant should win here");
is(d.fourteen, "14 ancestor",
"ancestor should win if descendant does nothing")
is(d.fifteen, 15,
"Field beats ancestor's property, since the latter lives on higher proto")
is(d.sixteen, 16, "First field wins");
is(d.__proto__.seventeen, undefined, "Shouldn't have this on proto");
is(typeof(d.__proto__.seventeen), "undefined",
"Really, should be undefined");
is(d.seventeen, 17, "Should have this prop on the node itself, though");
is(d.eighteen, 18, "Property beats field");
is(d.nineteen, 19, "Property still beats field");
d = $("display4");
is(d.twenty, 20, "Should be 20");
d = $("display5");
found = false;
for (var prop2 in d) {
if (prop2 == "twenty-one") {
found = true;
break;
}
}
is(found, true, "Enumeration is broken");
is(d["twenty-one"], 21, "Should be 21");
SimpleTest.finish();
}
]]>
</script>
</pre>
</body>
</html>