We don't currently have a mechanism for rerendering when the front/back
flips, so we should disable running such animations on the compositor
thread for now until we do.
Bug 1186204 covers reenabling.
The reftest fails without the patch (showing a blue almost-square
rectangle), and passes with the patch.
The use of reftest-no-flush (added in patch 1) is needed to achieve the
failure without the patch, because the flushWindow() function in
reftest-content.js calls getBoundingClientRect() to flush rendering,
which has the side-effect of flushing style updates that have been
suppressed on the main thread while we're running an animation off the
main thread, which in turn covers up the bug.
I confirmed that the patch fixes the original testcase (attachment
8634600). I also confirmed that with the whole patch,
layout/style/test/test_descriptor_syntax_errors.html passes, but with
the new tests but not the code change, it reports 12 failures.
The bulk of this commit was generated by running:
run-clang-tidy.py \
-checks='-*,llvm-namespace-comment' \
-header-filter=^/.../mozilla-central/.* \
-fix
The connection between an Animation and an AnimationTimeline is optional. That
is, it is possible to have an Animation without an AnimationTimeline. Until now
we have often just assumed the timeline will be set but eventually we need to
support the possibility of the timeline being null. Indeed, later in this patch
series we will set the timeline out-of-band (i.e. not in the constructor) using
SetTimeline which opens up the possibility that timeline will be null for
a period of time.
This patch paves the way for having an optional timeline by storing the global
used for, e.g. creating promises, on the Animation object itself.
Earlier in this patch series we added an assertion to the destructor for
CSSAnimation and CSSTransition to check that the owning element has been
cleared when the animation is destroyed.
This assertion fails, however, for transitions because there are a two
code paths where a transition may be destroyed without being cancelled.
This patch adjusts those two code paths to ensure transitions are always
cancelled before being destroyed.
This patch adds a convenience method for getting the transition property for
a CSS transition (so we can use this when ordering CSS transitions).
We already have ElementPropertyTransition::TransitionProperty() so this might
seem to be redundant, however we add this now because:
* In the proposed CSS Transitions <-> Web Animations integration, the
CSSTransition interface has a transitionProperty member so we'll need this
function for that.
* Once we allow script to modify the transition, we'll need to track the
original transition property for sorting purposes which is what this method
should do.
* We'll possibly drop ElementPropertyTransition::TransitionProperty() in the
future.
Similar to the earlier patch in this series that changed the sequence number
handling for animations, this patch re-uses Animation::mSequenceNum to store
the animation generation number when each transition was generated. When the
transition is cancelled it reverts to using the default animation composite
ordering.
This patch also extends the tests for Element.getAnimations(). It doesn't
actually exercise the code added (it's not actually called yet since it doesn't
need to be for Element.getAnimations) but simply provides a useful regression
and interop test.
This patch re-uses Animation::mSequenceNum to store the index of CSS animations
within their corresponding animation-name property. When the animation is
removed from an animation-name property it reverts to using the default
animation composite order.
This patch also updates Animation::DoCancel to call UpdateTiming instead of
UpdateEffect. This is because UpdateTiming is responsible for updating the
sequence number (when custom composite order is not in effect). When we remove
an animation from animation-name it will be cancelled and at that point we
expect its sequence number to be cleared which will only happen if
UpdateTiming gets called.
In order to sort CSS animation objects correctly, we need to know which
element's animation-name property they appear in, if any. Normally that's
simply the target element of the animation's keyframe effect but it can differ
in the following cases:
1) When script modifies a CSSAnimation's effect to target a different element
(or simply removes the effect altogether). In this case we use the
*owning* element to determine the priority of the animation, not the target
element.
This scenario does not yet occur (bug 1049975).
2) When script creates a CSSAnimation object using the CSSAnimation constructor.
In this case, the owning element should be empty (null) and we should
determine the priority of the animation in the same way as any other
Animation object.
Again, this is not yet supported (or even specced) but will be eventually.
3) When script holds a reference to a CSSAnimation object but then updates the
animation-name property such that the animation object is cancelled. In this
case the owning element should be cleared (null) so we know to not to try and
sort this with regard to any animation-name property.
This is possible using code such as the following:
elem.style.animation = 'a 5s';
var a = elem.getAnimations()[0];
elem.style.animation = 'b 5s';
a.play(); // Bring a back to life
document.timeline.getAnimations();
// ^ At this point we need to know how to sort 'a' and 'b' which depends
// on recognizing that a is no longer part of an animation-name list.
Until we implement bug 1049975, we could support sorting animations without
adding the reference to the owning element by setting a flag on the CSSAnimation
object but (having tried this) it turns out to be cleaner to just introduce this
reference now, particularly since we know we will need it later.
Note that we will also need this information in future to dispatch events to the
correct element in circumstances such as (1) once we separate updating timing
information (including events) from applying animation values.
Prior to this patch we cancel animations in AnimationCollection::Destroy but
this is not called automatically when the property holding the collection is
destroyed via its destructor. When an element is unbound from the tree we
destroy its animation properties but don't call AnimationCollection::Destroy.
This means, that in such circumstances:
* We won't create animation mutation records for the removed animations
* Once we start registering animations with a timeline they won't have a
chance to remove themselves from the timeline (meaning
document.timeline.getAnimations()) will keep returning them
* Once we go to implement the animationcancel and transitioncancel events we
won't fire them in this case (assuming we implement the queueing/dispatch of
those events as part of the cancel code)
This patch addresses this by moving the call to cancel each animations to the
property destructor for the animation properties.
We do this first so we can land this change separately to ease bisecting any
regressions it might trigger.
The original motivation for the Iterator/RemovingIterator split was that
PLDHashTable Checker class would treat them differently. But that didn't end up
happening (see bug 1131308). So this patch merges them. This is a small code
size win now but it will become bigger when I add iterators to nsTHashTable and
nsBaseHashtable.
The only complication is that PLDHashTable::Iter() is now non-const, which is
a problem if you use it in a const method. So I added PLDHashTable::ConstIter()
which is used in just two places. It's a bit of a hack -- effectively a
const_cast -- but I don't think it's too bad.
