Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Justin Lebar
8c64b0474c Bug 802366 - The main event: Let a browser process inherit its app's id. r=bz,cjones
The main bug fixed here is that in half of our interfaces, we use "is browser frame/element" to mean "browser or app", and in the other half, we use it to mean "is browser not app".

There's a related, functional bug also fixed here, which is that a browser process doesn't inherit its parent's app-id.  This causes problems e.g. for IndexedDB: If a browser inside an app uses IndexedDB, the DB should have the app's app-id.

I also modified Tab{Parent,Child} and nsFrameLoader to call "app" "ownOrContainingApp", to emphasize that we might have inherited the app from a parent process.  I left nsIDocShell::appId alone, because changing that would have necessitated changing nsILoadGroup and therefore a /lot/ of users in Necko; it's also not clear it would have clarified anything in those cases.
2012-11-10 10:32:37 -08:00
Ryan VanderMeulen
f774dcd8ba Backed out 12 changesets (bug 806127, bug 802366, bug 806168) for Windows build bustage.
--HG--
rename : dom/indexedDB/test/webapp_clearBrowserData.js => dom/indexedDB/test/test_webapp_clearBrowserData.html
2012-11-09 20:14:40 -05:00
Justin Lebar
19b287d268 Bug 802366 - The main event: Let a browser process inherit its app's id. r=bz,cjones
The main bug fixed here is that in half of our interfaces, we use "is browser frame/element" to mean "browser or app", and in the other half, we use it to mean "is browser not app".

There's a related, functional bug also fixed here, which is that a browser process doesn't inherit its parent's app-id.  This causes problems e.g. for IndexedDB: If a browser inside an app uses IndexedDB, the DB should have the app's app-id.

I also modified Tab{Parent,Child} and nsFrameLoader to call "app" "ownOrContainingApp", to emphasize that we might have inherited the app from a parent process.  I left nsIDocShell::appId alone, because changing that would have necessitated changing nsILoadGroup and therefore a /lot/ of users in Necko; it's also not clear it would have clarified anything in those cases.
2012-11-09 16:37:39 -08:00