The change to the 427129-table-caption test was just to make the
reference match the test.
The change to the other 427129 tests was duplicating the test that
failed, adjusting the reference for one version of it (no longer pushed
down), and testing an alternative pushed-down case for the other
version.
It's not clear to me how to test that that
1062963-floatmanager-reflow.html still tests what it originally tested,
given the code change that's happened since.
This adds an additional retry loop in block reflow that we can only
trigger when reflowing a block formatting context (replacedBlock
non-null). It can retry in two different ways, either with a narrower
width but at the same vertical position (when
ReplacedBlockFitsInAvailSpace is still true) or at a new vertical
position (which is treated as a form of clearance).
Fortunately we don't have to worry about margins collapsing *through*
such a boundary since we're dealing with a new block formatting context.
Note that Chromium passes all of the new bfc-displace-* tests, although
it moves the block formating context down unnecessarily in
bfc-shrink-1.html (which we do neither before nor after the patch),
though agrees with the width we have after the patch (but not before the
patch).
Without this change, nsBlockFrame::ReflowBlockFrame will fail to have
mayNeedRetry true, which means that it won't set
blockHTMLRS.mDiscoveredClearance, which means that on a descendant
replaced block we will fail to fall into any of the cases that call
ClearFloats. This change will cause us to hit the first ClearFloats
call and discover the need for clearance.
I tested locally that the new reftest fails without the patch and passes
with the patch.
* * *
Bug 1131451 part 2a - Remove hack for rtl-in-vertical-mode from ReflowAbsoluteFrame. r=dholbert
* * *
Bug 1131451 part 2b - Mark relative-overconstrained tests that now pass in vertical mode with rtl. r=dholbert
* * *
Bug 1131451 part 2c - Mark vertical border-collapse bevel tests that now pass. r=dholbert
* * *
Bug 1131451 part 2d - Remove partial rtl-in-vertical support from nsBidiPresUtils now that logical-coordinate classes handle it better. r=dholbert
* * *
Bug 1131451 part 2e - Remove hack for float positioning in vertical mode with dir=rtl. r=dholbert
* * *
Bug 1131451 part 2f - Mark vertical-mode float-in-rtl reftests that are now passing. r=dholbert
* * *
Bug 1131451 part 2g - Compute both dimensions of containerSize in nsFlexContainerFrame::DoLayout. r=dholbert
* * *
Bug 1131451 part 2h - Mark flexbox writing-mode tests that are now passing. r=dholbert
Outer table frames act as CSS2.1 table wrapper boxes. We used to lay them out
without taking their margins into the account, which meant that their width was
always equal to the available width. This breaks horizontal positioning of
absolutely positioned kids of a table frame.
The main purpose of this patch is to apply the margins of tables to their outer
frame, instead of the inner frame. This means that the inner table frame will
always have a zero margin, which means that a lot of the stuff which used to
rely on the fact that table margins are applied to the inner frame need to
change.
In particular, in order to get the computed margins of a table, we used to query
the inner table frame, and this patch corrects that. Also, when shrink wrapping
tables, we used to not take the margins of the inner table frame into account,
which is fixed by this patch too. nsBlockReflowState::
ComputeReplacedBlockOffsetsForFloats also needed to be changed to read the
margin values from the outer frame too.
Also, as part of this patch, we start to respect the CSS2.1 margin model for
captions on all sides. This means that in particular, the top/bottom margins on
the top-outside and bottom-outside captions will not be collapsed with the
top/bottom margins of the table, and that the margins of the caption element
contribute to the width and height of the outer table frame. The
427129-table-caption reftest has been modified to match this new behavior.
Another side effect of this bug is fixing bug 87277, and the reftests for that
bug are marked as passing in this patch.
