The assertions in nsINode and nsWrapperCache are to eagerly catch
failures to override those methods.
The classinfo change for XULTreeBuilder is needed because one of those
is returned via an nsIXULTemplateBuilder attribute on XULElement.
Alternately, I could mark it notflattened in Bindings.conf, but Enn
said he prefers this anyway.
The change to the QI impl in BindingUtils is needed because when
XPConnect converts an IID from C++ to JS it makes is an nsJSID, not an
nsJSIID. We've run into this before, sadly.
I removed "id" from nsIDOMXULElement because it's already on Element.
I suppose I could have left it there, but this seems cleaner.
The nsJSIID::HasInstance changes are needed to support XBL-implemented
interfaces. Sadly, this does mean that if the underlying object QIs
to something but we didn't put those props on the WebIDL we'll end up
testing true for instanceof but not exposing the props. I don't see
an obviously better way. We should work on killing off uses of
"instanceof someinterface".
The browser.js change is needed to avoid throwing exceptions during
browser-chrome tests that are now getting reported because our
swapFrameLoaders is no longer an XPConnect method.
The assertions in nsINode and nsWrapperCache are to eagerly catch
failures to override those methods.
The classinfo change for XULTreeBuilder is needed because one of those
is returned via an nsIXULTemplateBuilder attribute on XULElement.
Alternately, I could mark it notflattened in Bindings.conf, but Enn
said he prefers this anyway.
The change to the QI impl in BindingUtils is needed because when
XPConnect converts an IID from C++ to JS it makes is an nsJSID, not an
nsJSIID. We've run into this before, sadly.
I removed "id" from nsIDOMXULElement because it's already on Element.
I suppose I could have left it there, but this seems cleaner.
The nsJSIID::HasInstance changes are needed to support XBL-implemented
interfaces. Sadly, this does mean that if the underlying object QIs
to something but we didn't put those props on the WebIDL we'll end up
testing true for instanceof but not exposing the props. I don't see
an obviously better way. We should work on killing off uses of
"instanceof someinterface".
The browser.js change is needed to avoid throwing exceptions during
browser-chrome tests that are now getting reported because our
swapFrameLoaders is no longer an XPConnect method.
The main bug fixed here is that in half of our interfaces, we use "is browser frame/element" to mean "browser or app", and in the other half, we use it to mean "is browser not app".
There's a related, functional bug also fixed here, which is that a browser process doesn't inherit its parent's app-id. This causes problems e.g. for IndexedDB: If a browser inside an app uses IndexedDB, the DB should have the app's app-id.
I also modified Tab{Parent,Child} and nsFrameLoader to call "app" "ownOrContainingApp", to emphasize that we might have inherited the app from a parent process. I left nsIDocShell::appId alone, because changing that would have necessitated changing nsILoadGroup and therefore a /lot/ of users in Necko; it's also not clear it would have clarified anything in those cases.
The main bug fixed here is that in half of our interfaces, we use "is browser frame/element" to mean "browser or app", and in the other half, we use it to mean "is browser not app".
There's a related, functional bug also fixed here, which is that a browser process doesn't inherit its parent's app-id. This causes problems e.g. for IndexedDB: If a browser inside an app uses IndexedDB, the DB should have the app's app-id.
I also modified Tab{Parent,Child} and nsFrameLoader to call "app" "ownOrContainingApp", to emphasize that we might have inherited the app from a parent process. I left nsIDocShell::appId alone, because changing that would have necessitated changing nsILoadGroup and therefore a /lot/ of users in Necko; it's also not clear it would have clarified anything in those cases.
The main bug fixed here is that in half of our interfaces, we use "is browser frame/element" to mean "browser or app", and in the other half, we use it to mean "is browser not app".
There's a related, functional bug also fixed here, which is that a browser process doesn't inherit its parent's app-id. This causes problems e.g. for IndexedDB: If a browser inside an app uses IndexedDB, the DB should have the app's app-id.
I also modified Tab{Parent,Child} and nsFrameLoader to call "app" "ownOrContainingApp", to emphasize that we might have inherited the app from a parent process. I left nsIDocShell::appId alone, because changing that would have necessitated changing nsILoadGroup and therefore a /lot/ of users in Necko; it's also not clear it would have clarified anything in those cases.
(Re-landing changeset a6a847452dbf, backed out in 5091aa6083c4, because it was originally landed with the incorrect bug number.)
The main bug fixed here is that in half of our interfaces, we use "is browser frame/element" to mean "browser or app", and in the other half, we use it to mean "is browser not app".
There's a related, functional bug also fixed here, which is that a browser process doesn't inherit its parent's app-id. This causes problems e.g. for IndexedDB: If a browser inside an app uses IndexedDB, the DB should have the app's app-id.
I also modified Tab{Parent,Child} and nsFrameLoader to call "app" "ownOrContainingApp", to emphasize that we might have inherited the app from a parent process. I left nsIDocShell::appId alone, because changing that would have necessitated changing nsILoadGroup and therefore a /lot/ of users in Necko; it's also not clear it would have clarified anything in those cases.
--HG--
extra : rebase_source : f3ef9475e21204da10bf39c6cca506bc08096949
