From ff2cd83c25fa22531fc94d1b9c9c103608513971 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Chou Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:31:47 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Bug 818696 - prevent "pairing failed" prompt from appearing after re-enabling Bluetooth, r=gyeh --- dom/bluetooth/linux/BluetoothDBusService.cpp | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/dom/bluetooth/linux/BluetoothDBusService.cpp b/dom/bluetooth/linux/BluetoothDBusService.cpp index 03166dbea66..170cecf80a3 100644 --- a/dom/bluetooth/linux/BluetoothDBusService.cpp +++ b/dom/bluetooth/linux/BluetoothDBusService.cpp @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ static const char* sBluetoothDBusSignals[] = static nsAutoPtr gThreadConnection; static nsDataHashtable sPairingReqTable; static nsDataHashtable sAuthorizeReqTable; +static bool sIsPairing = false; typedef void (*UnpackFunc)(DBusMessage*, DBusError*, BluetoothValue&, nsAString&); class DistributeBluetoothSignalTask : public nsRunnable { @@ -819,8 +820,12 @@ RunDBusCallback(DBusMessage* aMsg, void* aBluetoothReplyRunnable, void GetObjectPathCallback(DBusMessage* aMsg, void* aBluetoothReplyRunnable) { - RunDBusCallback(aMsg, aBluetoothReplyRunnable, - UnpackObjectPathMessage); + if (sIsPairing) { + RunDBusCallback(aMsg, aBluetoothReplyRunnable, + UnpackObjectPathMessage); + + sIsPairing = false; + } } void @@ -1566,6 +1571,8 @@ BluetoothDBusService::StopInternal() sAuthorizeReqTable.EnumerateRead(UnrefDBusMessages, nullptr); sAuthorizeReqTable.Clear(); + sIsPairing = false; + StopDBus(); return NS_OK; } @@ -2087,6 +2094,21 @@ BluetoothDBusService::CreatePairedDeviceInternal(const nsAString& aAdapterPath, return NS_ERROR_FAILURE; } + + /** + * FIXME: Bug 820274 + * + * If the user turns off Bluetooth in the middle of pairing process, the + * callback function GetObjectPathCallback (see the third argument of the + * function call above) may still be called while enabling next time by + * dbus daemon. To prevent this from happening, added a flag to distinguish + * if Bluetooth has been turned off. Nevertheless, we need a check if there + * is a better solution. + * + * Please see Bug 818696 for more information. + */ + sIsPairing = true; + runnable.forget(); return NS_OK; }