Bug 1224596 part 4. Switch WebSocket to using the new WorkerMainThreadRunnable::Dispatch signature. r=khuey

This commit is contained in:
Boris Zbarsky 2015-11-24 00:04:20 -05:00
parent f33b314349
commit 63fa1800e8

View File

@ -336,7 +336,13 @@ WebSocketImpl::PrintErrorOnConsole(const char *aBundleURI,
RefPtr<PrintErrorOnConsoleRunnable> runnable =
new PrintErrorOnConsoleRunnable(this, aBundleURI, aError, aFormatStrings,
aFormatStringsLen);
runnable->Dispatch(mWorkerPrivate->GetJSContext());
ErrorResult rv;
runnable->Dispatch(rv);
// XXXbz this seems totally broken. We should be propagating this out, but
// none of our callers really propagate anything usefully. Come to think of
// it, why is this a syncrunnable anyway? Can't this be a fire-and-forget
// runnable??
rv.SuppressException();
return;
}
@ -617,7 +623,11 @@ WebSocketImpl::Disconnect()
} else {
RefPtr<DisconnectInternalRunnable> runnable =
new DisconnectInternalRunnable(this);
runnable->Dispatch(mWorkerPrivate->GetJSContext());
ErrorResult rv;
runnable->Dispatch(rv);
// XXXbz this seems totally broken. We should be propagating this out, but
// where to, exactly?
rv.SuppressException();
}
// DontKeepAliveAnyMore() can release the object. So hold a reference to this
@ -1259,7 +1269,7 @@ WebSocket::Constructor(const GlobalObject& aGlobal,
new InitRunnable(webSocket->mImpl, aUrl, protocolArray,
nsAutoCString(file.get()), lineno, column, aRv,
&connectionFailed);
runnable->Dispatch(aGlobal.Context());
runnable->Dispatch(aRv);
}
if (NS_WARN_IF(aRv.Failed())) {
@ -1339,7 +1349,7 @@ WebSocket::Constructor(const GlobalObject& aGlobal,
} else {
RefPtr<AsyncOpenRunnable> runnable =
new AsyncOpenRunnable(webSocket->mImpl, aRv);
runnable->Dispatch(aGlobal.Context());
runnable->Dispatch(aRv);
}
if (NS_WARN_IF(aRv.Failed())) {