Currently the debounce time pinconfig option uses an unspecified
"time units" unit. As pinconfig options should use SI units and a
real unit is also necessary for generic dt bindings, change it
to usec. Currently no driver is using the generic pinconfig option
for this, so the unit change is safe to do.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
PULL_PIN_DEFAULT is meant for hardware completely hiding any pull
settings from the driver, so that it's really only possible to turn
the pull on or off, but it not being possible to determine any
pull settings from software.
Also the binding-documentation for the pull arguments did not match
the changes to the expected values.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
From the inception ot the pin config API there has been the
possibility to get a handle at a pin directly and configure
its electrical characteristics. For this reason we had:
int pin_config_get(const char *dev_name, const char *name,
unsigned long *config);
int pin_config_set(const char *dev_name, const char *name,
unsigned long config);
int pin_config_group_get(const char *dev_name,
const char *pin_group,
unsigned long *config);
int pin_config_group_set(const char *dev_name,
const char *pin_group,
unsigned long config);
After the introduction of the pin control states that will
control pins associated with devices, and its subsequent
introduction to the device core, as well as the
introduction of pin control hogs that can set up states on
boot and optionally also at sleep, this direct pin control
API is a thing of the past.
As could be expected, it has zero in-kernel users.
Let's delete this API and make our world simpler.
Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The kerneldoc comment for struct pinconf_ops was missing
pin_config_dbg_parse_modify, and instead described
pin_config_group_dbg_set (which is presumably an old name for the same
function). Rename it in the kerneldoc comment so they match.
Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
It is counter-intuitive to have "0" mean disable in a boolean
manner for electronic properties of pins such as pull-up and
pull-down. Therefore, define that a pull-up/pull-down argument
of 0 to such a generic option means that the pin is
short-circuited to VDD or GROUND. Pull disablement shall be
done using PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE.
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The comment introduced with the recently added pinctrl_gpio_range.pins
element was wrong. This corrects it.
Thanks to Patrice Chotard for pointing this out.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The stubs for the !PINCTRL case were placed in the wrong
part of the file, causing breakage in linux-next when compiling
SH without pinctrl. Fix it up by moving the stubs to the right
place.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Traditionally, GPIO ranges are based on consecutive ranges of both GPIO
and pin numbers. This patch allows for GPIO ranges with arbitrary lists
of pin numbers.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
If a device have sleep and idle states in addition to the
default state, look up these in the core and stash them in
the pinctrl state container.
Add accessor functions for pinctrl consumers to put the pins
into "default", "sleep" and "idle" states passing nothing but
the struct device * affected.
Solution suggested by Kevin Hilman, Mark Brown and Dmitry
Torokhov in response to a patch series from Hebbar
Gururaja.
Cc: Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
There exist controllers that don't support to set the pull to up or down
separately but instead automatically set the pull direction based on
embedded knowledge inside the controller, for example depending on the
selected mux function of the pin.
Therefore this patch adds another config option to use this default
pull-state for a pin where it is not possible to know or decide if the
pin will be pulled up or down.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Add a new PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_BUS_HOLD pin configuration for a bus holder
pin mode (also known as bus keeper, or repeater). This is a weak latch
which drives the last value on a tristate bus. Another device on the bus
can drive the bus high or low before going tristate to change the value
driven by the pin.
Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This update adds a debugfs interface to modify a pin configuration
for a given state in the pinctrl map. This allows to modify the
configuration for a non-active state, typically sleep state.
This configuration is not applied right away, but only when the state
will be entered.
This solution is mandated for us by HW validation: in order
to test and verify several pin configurations during sleep without
recompiling the software.
Change log in this patch set;
Take into account latest feedback from Stephen Warren:
- stale comments update
- improved code efficiency and readibility
- limit size of global variable pinconf_dbg_conf
- remove req_type as it can easily be added later when
add/delete requests support is implemented
Signed-off-by: Laurent Meunier <laurent.meunier@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Rename PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_DISABLE to
PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE. It's used to make it more generialize.
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This makes the device core auto-grab the pinctrl handle and set
the "default" (PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT) state for every device
that is present in the device model right before probe. This will
account for the lion's share of embedded silicon devcies.
A modification of the semantics for pinctrl_get() is also done:
previously if the pinctrl handle for a certain device was already
taken, the pinctrl core would return an error. Now, since the
core may have already default-grabbed the handle and set its
state to "default", if the handle was already taken, this will
be disregarded and the located, previously instanitated handle
will be returned to the caller.
This way all code in drivers explicitly requesting their pinctrl
handlers will still be functional, and drivers that want to
explicitly retrieve and switch their handles can still do that.
But if the desired functionality is just boilerplate of this
type in the probe() function:
struct pinctrl *p;
p = devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(&dev);
if (IS_ERR(p)) {
if (PTR_ERR(p) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;
dev_warn(&dev, "no pinctrl handle\n");
}
The discussion began with the addition of such boilerplate
to the omap4 keypad driver:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-input&m=135091157719300&w=2
A previous approach using notifiers was discussed:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135263661110528&w=2
This failed because it could not handle deferred probes.
This patch alone does not solve the entire dilemma faced:
whether code should be distributed into the drivers or
if it should be centralized to e.g. a PM domain. But it
solves the immediate issue of the addition of boilerplate
to a lot of drivers that just want to grab the default
state. As mentioned, they can later explicitly retrieve
the handle and set different states, and this could as
well be done by e.g. PM domains as it is only related
to a certain struct device * pointer.
ChangeLog v4->v5 (Stephen):
- Simplified the devicecore grab code.
- Deleted a piece of documentation recommending that pins
be mapped to a device rather than hogged.
ChangeLog v3->v4 (Linus):
- Drop overzealous NULL checks.
- Move kref initialization to pinctrl_create().
- Seeking Tested-by from Stephen Warren so we do not disturb
the Tegra platform.
- Seeking ACK on this from Greg (and others who like it) so I
can merge it through the pinctrl subsystem.
ChangeLog v2->v3 (Linus):
- Abstain from using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() in the driver core,
Russell recently sent a patch to remove it. Handle the
NULL case explicitly even though it's a bogus case.
- Make sure we handle probe deferral correctly in the device
core file. devm_kfree() the container on error so we don't
waste memory for devices without pinctrl handles.
- Introduce reference counting into the pinctrl core using
<linux/kref.h> so that we don't release pinctrl handles
that have been obtained for two or more places.
ChangeLog v1->v2 (Linus):
- Only store a pointer in the device struct, and only allocate
this if it's really used by the device.
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@stericsson.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
[swarren: fixed and simplified error-handling in pinctrl_bind_pins(), to
correctly handle deferred probe. Removed admonition from docs not to use
pinctrl hogs for devices]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Add new function to get devname from pinctrl_dev. pinctrl_dev_get_name()
can only get pinctrl description name. If we want to use gpio driver to
find pinctrl device node, we need to fetch the pinctrl device name.
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Some pin configurations IP allows to set the current output to the pin.
This patch adds such a parameter to the pinconf-generic mechanism.
This parameter takes as argument the drive strength in mA.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This adds a definition of a generic output configuration
for a certain pin when using the generic pin configuration
library. Whereas driving pins low/high is usually a GPIO
business, you may want to set up pins into a default state
using hogs, and never touch them again. This helps out
with that scenario.
Based on a patch from Patrice Chotard.
Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@stericsson.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
In Marvell PXA/MMP silicons, input schmitt disable value is 0x40, not 0.
So append new config parameter -- input schmitt disable.
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This adds a function to the pinctrl core to retrieve the GPIO
range associated with a certain pin for a certain controller.
This is needed when a pinctrl driver want to look up the
corresponding struct gpio_chip for a certain pin. As the
GPIO drivers can now create these ranges themselves, the
pinctrl driver no longer knows about all its associated GPIO
chips.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Rename the function find_pinctrl_and_add_gpio_range()
to pinctrl_find_and_add_gpio_range() so as to be consistent
with the rest of the functions.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The fact that of_gpiochip_add_pin_range() and
gpiochip_add_pin_range() share too much code is fragile and
will invariably mean that bugs need to be fixed in two places
instead of one.
So separate the concerns of gpiolib.c and gpiolib-of.c and
have the latter call the former as back-end. This is necessary
also when going forward with other device descriptions such
as ACPI.
This is done by:
- Adding a return code to gpiochip_add_pin_range() so we can
reliably check whether this succeeds.
- Get rid of the custom of_pinctrl_add_gpio_range() from
pinctrl. Instead create of_pinctrl_get() to just retrive the
pin controller per se from an OF node. This composite
function was just begging to be deleted, it was way to
purpose-specific.
- Use pinctrl_dev_get_name() to get the name of the retrieved
pin controller and use that to call back into the generic
gpiochip_add_pin_range().
Now the pin range is only allocated and tied to a pin
controller from the core implementation in gpiolib.c.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
pinctrl subsystem needs gpio chip base to prepare set of gpio
pin ranges, which a given pinctrl driver can handle. This is
important to handle pinctrl gpio request calls in order to
program a given pin properly for gpio operation.
As gpio base is allocated dynamically during gpiochip
registration, presently there exists no clean way to pass this
information to the pinctrl subsystem.
After few discussions from [1], it was concluded that may be
gpio controller reporting the pin range it supports, is a
better way than pinctrl subsystem directly registering it.
[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/184816
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
[Edited documentation a bit]
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
