In case devfreq->previous_freq is still uninitialized in
devfreq_update_status(), i.e. it has value '0', the lookups in
that function fail, eventually leading to some error message:
[ 3.041292] devfreq bus_dmc: Couldn't update frequency transition information.
Just skip the statup update in this situation.
Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
load_count/total_count are reset by devfreq_event_get_event(), so
remove the redundant code in exynos_nocp_get_event().
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
[ rjw: Subject/changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Current code uses devm_regulator_get() in .probe so a regulator_put() will
be automatically called when unload the module. Remove the explictly
regulator_put() call and then we can also remove rk3399_dmcfreq_remove().
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The newly added ARM_RK3399_DMC_DEVFREQ driver requires the
DEVFREQ_EVENT_ROCKCHIP_DFI driver and tries to turn that on through
a 'select' statement, and that in turn has a dependency on
PM_DEVFREQ_EVENT, which may be disabled here:
warning: (ARM_RK3399_DMC_DEVFREQ) selects DEVFREQ_EVENT_ROCKCHIP_DFI which has unmet direct dependencies (PM_DEVFREQ && PM_DEVFREQ_EVENT && ARCH_ROCKCHIP)
We probably want a 'depends on' here, but other drivers use 'select'
too, so for consistency I'm doing the same.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: 5a893e31a6 (PM / devfreq: rockchip: add devfreq driver for rk3399 dmc)
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This reverts the Tegra part of commit 797da5598f (PM / devfreq: Add
COMPILE_TEST for build coverage) that introduced a build failute in
in linux-next.
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
base on dfi result, we do ddr frequency scaling, register
dmc driver to devfreq framework, and use simple-ondemand
policy.
Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: MyngJoo Ham <myngjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
on rk3399 platform, there is dfi conroller can monitor
ddr load, base on this result, we can do ddr freqency
scaling.
Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Use tab rather than space to indent, and tab + two spaces to indent
help message.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
for_each_child_of_node() performs an of_node_put() on each iteration, so
putting an of_node_put() before a continue results in a double put.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/iterators/device_node_continue.cocci
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
In case of exynos_bus_parse_of() failure the code shouldn't
try to remove the OPP table and disable+unprepare bus->clk
as it has been already handled in exynos_bus_parse_of().
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
config DEVFREQ_EVENT_EXYNOS_PPMU
bool "EXYNOS PPMU (Platform Performance Monitoring Unit) DEVFREQ event Driver"
...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
Rather than rip out the existing modular code, Chanwoo indicated
that he'd rather see the driver offered as tristate.
I don't have the hardware for runtime validation, so this change
is only validated for compile and modpost.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
event/Kconfig:config DEVFREQ_EVENT_EXYNOS_NOCP
event/Kconfig: bool "EXYNOS NoC (Network On Chip) Probe DEVFREQ event Driver"
...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
Rather than rip out the existing modular code, Chanwoo indicated
that he'd rather see the driver offered as tristate.
I don't have the hardware for runtime validation, so this change
is only validated for compile and modpost.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
devfreq/Kconfig:config ARM_EXYNOS_BUS_DEVFREQ
devfreq/Kconfig: bool "ARM EXYNOS Generic Memory Bus DEVFREQ Driver"
...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
Rather than rip out the existing modular code, Chanwoo indicated
that he'd rather see the driver offered as tristate.
I don't have the hardware for runtime validation, so this change
is only validated for compile and modpost.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
menuconfig PM_DEVFREQ_EVENT
bool "DEVFREQ-Event device Support"
...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
This code wasn't using module_init, so we don't need to be concerned
with altering the initcall level here.
We don't replace module.h with init.h since the file already has that.
But we do add export.h since this file does export some symbols.
We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
is already contained at the top of the file in the comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
menuconfig PM_DEVFREQ
bool "Generic Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS) support"
...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
This code wasn't using module_init, so we don't need to be concerned
with altering the initcall level here.
We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
is already contained at the top of the file in the comments.
We don't replace module.h with init.h since the file already has that.
But we do add export.h since this file does export some symbols.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
This patch sends the DEVFREQ_POSTCHANGE notification when
devfreq->profile->targer() is failed. The PRECHANGE/POSTCHANGE
should be paired.
Fixes: 0fe3a66410 (PM / devfreq: Add new DEVFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER notifier)
Reported-by: Lin Huang <hl@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Some systems need current frequency from last_status for calculation
but it is zeroed during initialization. When the device starts there is
no history, but we can assume that the last frequency was the
same as the initial frequency (which is also used in 'previous_freq').
The log shows the result of this misinterpreted value.
[ 2.042847] ... Failed to get voltage for frequency 0: -34
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Smatch complains because platform_get_resource() returns NULL on error
and not an error pointer so the check is wrong. Julia Lawall pointed
out that normally we don't check these, because devm_ioremap_resource()
has a check for NULL.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
When device_register() returns with error, it has already
done put_device() on the input device pointer.
Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
