There are about 100,000 uses of 'static const <type>' but about 400 uses
of 'static <type> const' in the kernel where type is not a pointer.
The kernel almost always uses "static const" over "const static" as there
is a compiler warning for that declaration style.
But there is no compiler warning for "static <type> const".
So add a checkpatch warning for the atypical declaration uses of.
const static <type> <foo>
and
static <type> const <foo>
For example:
$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --emacs --quiet --nosummary -types=static_const arch/arm/crypto/aes-ce-glue.c
arch/arm/crypto/aes-ce-glue.c:75: WARNING: Move const after static - use 'static const u8'
#75: FILE: arch/arm/crypto/aes-ce-glue.c:75:
+ static u8 const rcon[] = {
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/4b863be68e679546b40d50b97a4a806c03056a1c.camel@perches.com
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Presence of hexadecimal address or symbol results in false warning
message by checkpatch.pl.
For example, running checkpatch on commit b8ad540dd4 ("mptcp: fix
memory leak in mptcp_subflow_create_socket()") results in warning:
WARNING:REPEATED_WORD: Possible repeated word: 'ff'
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2f 30 0a 81 88 ff ff ........./0.....
Similarly, the presence of list command output in commit results in
an unnecessary warning.
For example, running checkpatch on commit 899e5ffbf2 ("perf record:
Introduce --switch-output-event") gives:
WARNING:REPEATED_WORD: Possible repeated word: 'root'
dr-xr-x---. 12 root root 4096 Apr 27 17:46 ..
Here, it reports 'ff' and 'root' to be repeated, but it is in fact part
of some address or code, where it has to be repeated.
In these cases, the intent of the warning to find stylistic issues in
commit messages is not met and the warning is just completely wrong in
this case.
To avoid these warnings, add an additional regex check for the directory
permission pattern and avoid checking the line for this class of
warning. Similarly, to avoid hex pattern, check if the word consists of
hex symbols and skip this warning if it is not among the common english
words formed using hex letters.
A quick evaluation on v5.6..v5.8 showed that this fix reduces
REPEATED_WORD warnings by the frequency of 1890.
A quick manual check found all cases are related to hex output or list
command outputs in commit messages.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201024102253.13614-1-yashsri421@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Recently, commit 4f6ad8aa1eac ("checkpatch: move repeated word test")
moved the repeated word test to check for more file types. But after
this, if checkpatch.pl is run on MAINTAINERS, it generates several
new warnings of the type:
WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'git'
For example:
WARNING: Possible repeated word: 'git'
+T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/uml.git
So, the pattern "git git://..." is a false positive in this case.
There are several other combinations which may produce a wrong warning
message, such as "@size size", ":Begin begin", etc.
Extend repeated word check to compare the characters before and after
the word matches.
If there is a non whitespace character before the first word or a non
whitespace character excluding punctuation characters after the second
word, then the check is skipped and the warning is avoided.
Also add case insensitive word matching to the repeated word check.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/81b6a0bb2c7b9256361573f7a13201ebcd4876f1.camel@perches.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201017162732.152351-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Suggested-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The author signed-off-by checks are currently very vague. Cases like same
name or same address are not handled separately.
For example, running checkpatch on commit be6577af0c ("parisc: Add
atomic64_set_release() define to avoid CPU soft lockups"), gives:
WARNING: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author
'John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>'
The signoff line was:
"Signed-off-by: Dave Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>"
Clearly the author has signed off but with a slightly different version
of his name. A more appropriate warning would have been to point out
at the name mismatch instead.
Previously, the values assumed by $authorsignoff were either 0 or 1
to indicate whether a proper sign off by author is present.
Extended the checks to handle four new cases.
$authorsignoff values now denote the following:
0: Missing sign off by patch author.
1: Sign off present and identical.
2: Addresses and names match, but comments differ.
"James Watson(JW) <james@gmail.com>", "James Watson <james@gmail.com>"
3: Addresses match, but names are different.
"James Watson <james@gmail.com>", "James <james@gmail.com>"
4: Names match, but addresses are different.
"James Watson <james@watson.com>", "James Watson <james@gmail.com>"
5: Names match, addresses excluding subaddress details (RFC 5233) match.
"James Watson <james@gmail.com>", "James Watson <james+a@gmail.com>"
Also introduced a new message type FROM_SIGN_OFF_MISMATCH
for cases 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/c1ca28e77e8e3bfa7aadf3efa8ed70f97a9d369c.camel@perches.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201007192029.551744-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To avoid false positives in presence of SPDX-License-Identifier in
networking files it is required to increase the leeway for empty block
comment lines by one line.
For example, checking drivers/net/loopback.c which starts with
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/*
* INET An implementation of the TCP/IP protocol suite for the LINUX
rsults in an unnecessary warning
WARNING: networking block comments don't use an empty /* line, use /* Comment...
+/*
+ * INET An implementation of the TCP/IP protocol suite for the LINUX
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Bartłomiej Żolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.co>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201006083509.19934-1-l.stelmach@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Checkpatch.pl doesn't have a check for excluding while (...) {...} blocks
from MULTISTATEMENT_MACRO_USE_DO_WHILE error.
For example, running checkpatch.pl on the file mm/maccess.c in the kernel
generates the following error:
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
+#define copy_from_kernel_nofault_loop(dst, src, len, type, err_label) \
+ while (len >= sizeof(type)) { \
+ __get_kernel_nofault(dst, src, type, err_label); \
+ dst += sizeof(type); \
+ src += sizeof(type); \
+ len -= sizeof(type); \
+ }
The error is misleading for this case. Enclosing it in parentheses
doesn't make any sense.
Checkpatch already has an exception list for such common macro types.
Added a new exception for while (...) {...} style blocks to the same.
In addition, the brace flatten logic was modified by changing the
substitution characters from "1" to "1u". This was done to ensure that
macros in the form "#define foo(bar) while(bar){bar--;}" were also
correctly procecssed.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/dc985938aa3986702815a0bd68dfca8a03c85447.camel@perches.com/
Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201001171903.312021-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Embedding the complete filename path inside the file isn't particularly
useful as often the path is moved around and becomes incorrect.
Emit a warning when the source contains the filename.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove stray " di"]
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1fd5f9188a14acdca703ca00301ee323de672a8d.camel@perches.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Checkpatch did not handle cases where the author From: header was split
into multiple lines. The author identity could not be resolved and
checkpatch generated a false NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF warning.
A typical example is commit e33bcbab16 ("tee: add support for session's
client UUID generation"). When checkpatch was run on this commit, it
displayed:
"WARNING:NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal
patch author ''"
This was due to split header lines not being handled properly and the
author himself wrote in commit cd2614967d ("checkpatch: warn if missing
author Signed-off-by"):
"Split From: headers are not fully handled: only the first part
is compared."
Support split From: headers by correctly parsing the header extension
lines. RFC 5322, Section-2.2.3 stated that each extended line must start
with a WSP character (a space or htab). The solution was therefore to
concatenate the lines which start with a WSP to get the correct long
header.
Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel-mentees/f5d8124e54a50480b0a9fa638787bc29b6e09854.camel@perches.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200921085436.63003-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The uninitialized_var() macro was removed recently via commit 63a0895d96
("compiler: Remove uninitialized_var() macro") as it's not a particularly
useful warning and its use can "paper over real bugs".
Add a checkpatch test to warn on self-assignments as a means to avoid
compiler warnings and as a back-door mechanism to reproduce the old
uninitialized_var macro behavior.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/afc2cffdd315d3e4394af149278df9e8af7f49f4.camel@perches.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
trace_printk is meant as a debugging tool, and should not be compiled into
production code without specific debug Kconfig options enabled, or source
code changes, as indicated by the warning that shows up on boot if any
trace_printk is called:
** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE **
** **
** trace_printk() being used. Allocating extra memory. **
** **
** This means that this is a DEBUG kernel and it is **
** unsafe for production use. **
Let's warn developers when they try to submit such a change.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200825193600.v2.1.I723c43c155f02f726c97501be77984f1e6bb740a@changeid
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
There are commas used as statement terminations that should typically have
used semicolons instead. Only direct assignments or use of a single
function or value on a single line are detected by this test.
e.g.:
foo = bar(), /* typical use is semicolon not comma */
bar = baz();
Add an imperfect test to detect these comma uses.
No false positives were found in testing, but many types of false
negatives are possible.
e.g.:
foo = bar() + 1, /* comma use, but not direct assignment */
bar = baz();
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3bf27caf462007dfa75647b040ab3191374a59de.camel@perches.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Kconfig allows to customize the CONFIG_ prefix via the $CONFIG_
environment variable. Out-of-tree projects may therefore use Kconfig with
a different prefix, or they may use a custom configuration tool which does
not use the CONFIG_ prefix at all. Such projects may still want to adhere
to the Linux kernel coding style and run checkpatch.pl.
One example is OP-TEE [1] which does not use Kconfig but does have
configuration options prefixed with CFG_. It also mostly follows the
kernel coding style and therefore being able to use checkpatch is quite
valuable.
To make this possible, add the --kconfig-prefix command line option.
[1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os
Signed-off-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome@forissier.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200818081732.800449-1-jerome@forissier.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The usage of "capture group (...)" in the immediate condition after `&&`
results in `$1` being uninitialized. This issues a warning "Use of
uninitialized value $1 in regexp compilation at ./scripts/checkpatch.pl
line 2638".
I noticed this bug while running checkpatch on the set of commits from
v5.7 to v5.8-rc1 of the kernel on the commits with a diff content in
their commit message.
This bug was introduced in the script by commit e518e9a59e
("checkpatch: emit an error when there's a diff in a changelog"). It
has been in the script since then.
The author intended to store the match made by capture group in variable
`$1`. This should have contained the name of the file as `[\w/]+`
matched. However, this couldn't be accomplished due to usage of capture
group and `$1` in the same regular expression.
Fix this by placing the capture group in the condition before `&&`.
Thus, `$1` can be initialized to the text that capture group matches
thereby setting it to the desired and required value.
Fixes: e518e9a59e ("checkpatch: emit an error when there's a diff in a changelog")
Signed-off-by: Mrinal Pandey <mrinalmni@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Tested-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200714032352.f476hanaj2dlmiot@mrinalpandey
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Pull Kconfig updates from Masahiro Yamada:
- remove '---help---' keyword support
- fix mouse events for 'menuconfig' symbols in search view of qconf
- code cleanups of qconf
* tag 'kconfig-v5.9' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild: (24 commits)
kconfig: qconf: move setOptionMode() to ConfigList from ConfigView
kconfig: qconf: do not limit the pop-up menu to the first row
kconfig: qconf: refactor icon setups
kconfig: qconf: remove unused voidPix, menuInvPix
kconfig: qconf: remove ConfigItem::text/setText
kconfig: qconf: remove ConfigList::addColumn/removeColumn
kconfig: qconf: remove ConfigItem::pixmap/setPixmap
kconfig: qconf: drop more localization code
kconfig: qconf: remove 'parent' from ConfigList::updateMenuList()
kconfig: qconf: remove unused argument from ConfigView::updateList()
kconfig: qconf: remove unused argument from ConfigList::updateList()
kconfig: qconf: omit parent to QHBoxLayout()
kconfig: qconf: remove name from ConfigSearchWindow constructor
kconfig: qconf: remove unused ConfigList::listView()
kconfig: qconf: overload addToolBar() to create and insert toolbar
kconfig: qconf: remove toolBar from ConfigMainWindow members
kconfig: qconf: use 'menu' variable for (QMenu *)
kconfig: qconf: do not use 'menu' variable for (QMenuBar *)
kconfig: qconf: remove ->addSeparator() to menuBar
kconfig: add 'static' to some file-local data
...
Checkpatch reports warnings when some specific structs are not declared as
const in the code. The list of structs to consider was initially defined
in the checkpatch.pl script itself, but it was later moved to an external
file (scripts/const_structs.checkpatch), in commit bf1fa1dae6
("checkpatch: externalize the structs that should be const"). This
introduced two minor issues:
- When file scripts/const_structs.checkpatch is not present (for
example, if checkpatch is run outside of the kernel directory with the
"--no-tree" option), a warning is printed to stderr to tell the user
that "No structs that should be const will be found". This is fair,
but the warning is printed unconditionally, even if the option
"--ignore CONST_STRUCT" is passed. In the latter case, we explicitly
ask checkpatch to skip this check, so no warning should be printed.
- When scripts/const_structs.checkpatch is missing, or even when trying
to silence the warning by adding an empty file, $const_structs is set
to "", and the regex used for finding structs that should be const,
"$line =~ /struct\s+($const_structs)(?!\s*\{)/)", matches all
structs found in the code, thus reporting a number of false positives.
Let's fix the first item by skipping scripts/const_structs.checkpatch
processing if "CONST_STRUCT" checks are ignored, and the second one by
skipping the test if $const_structs is not defined. Since we modify the
read_words() function a little bit, update the checks for
$typedefsfile/$typeOtherTypedefs as well.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200623221822.3727-1-quentin@isovalent.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Add a --fix option for 2 types of single-line assignment in if statements
if ((foo = bar(...)) < BAZ) {
expands to:
foo = bar(..);
if (foo < BAZ) {
and
if ((foo = bar(...)) {
expands to:
foo = bar(...);
if (foo) {
if statements with assignments spanning multiple lines are
not converted with the --fix option.
if statements with additional logic are also not converted.
e.g.: if ((foo = bar(...)) & BAZ == BAZ) {
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/9bc7c782516f37948f202deba511bc95ed279bbd.camel@perches.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
