Now that we have all the shared memory region information populated in
the pcc_mbox_chan, let us propagate the pointer to the same as the
return value to pcc_mbox_request channel.
This eliminates the need for the individual users of PCC mailbox to
parse the PCCT subspace entries and fetch the shmem information. This
also eliminates the need for PCC mailbox controller to set con_priv to
PCCT subspace entries. This is required as con_priv is private to the
controller driver to attach private data associated with the channel and
not meant to be used by the mailbox client/users.
Let us convert all the users of pcc_mbox_{request,free}_channel to use
new interface.
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
On some systems the nominal_perf value retrieved via CPPC is just
a constant and fetching it doesn't require accessing any registers,
so if it is the only CPPC capability that's needed, it is wasteful
to run cppc_get_perf_caps() in order to get just that value alone,
especially when this is done for CPUs other than the one running
the code.
For this reason, introduce cppc_get_nominal_perf() allowing
nominal_perf to be obtained individually, by generalizing the
existing cppc_get_desired_perf() (and renaming it) so it can be
used to retrieve any specific CPPC capability value.
While at it, clean up the cppc_get_desired_perf() kerneldoc comment
a bit.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* acpi-misc:
ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations
ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue
ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations
ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations
ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function
ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue
ACPI: AC: fix some coding style issues
ACPI: fix various typos in comments
All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in
kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type
ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf);
because that is the type of the ->show() member in
'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type
ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf);
because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a
Control Flow Integrity violation [1].
$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf
3400
$ dmesg | grep "CFI failure"
[ 175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8):
As far as I can tell, the only difference between 'struct cppc_attr'
and 'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter
is the type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs.
size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are
read-only.
Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix
the violation.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/
Fixes: 158c998ea4 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1343
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including the
following types:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
WARNING: unnecessary whitespace before a quoted newline
ERROR: spaces required around that '>='
ERROR: switch and case should be at the same indent
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
For convenience, add empty stubs of library functions defined in
cppc_acpi.c for the CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB unset case.
Because one of them needs to return CPUFREQ_ETERNAL, include
linux/cpufreq.h into the CPPC library header file and drop the
direct inclusion of it from cppc_acpi.c.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Properly initialise vaddr pointers in cpc_read() and cpc_write() to
NULL instead of 0.
This fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:937:31: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:982:31: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ppc_comm_addr is a virtual address to the PCC space and it's annotated
with __iomem. Therefore, generic_comm_base which gets assigned the value of
pcc_comm_address should be annotated as well.
This already happens in check_pcc_chan(), but not in send_pcc_cmd(), which
results in the following sparse warnings:
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:237:18: warning: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:299:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:299:9: expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:299:9: got unsigned short *
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:302:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:302:9: expected void volatile [noderef] __iomem *addr
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:302:9: got unsigned short *
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* pm-cpufreq:
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use most recent guaranteed performance values
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement the ->adjust_perf() callback
cpufreq: Add special-purpose fast-switching callback for drivers
cpufreq: schedutil: Add util to struct sg_cpu
cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a list
cppc_cpufreq: expose information on frequency domains
cppc_cpufreq: clarify support for coordination types
cppc_cpufreq: use policy->cpu as driver of frequency setting
ACPI: processor: fix NONE coordination for domain mapping failure
ACPI: processor: Drop duplicate setting of shared_cpu_map
The cppc_cpudata per-cpu storage was inefficient (1) additional to causing
functional issues (2) when CPUs are hotplugged out, due to per-cpu data
being improperly initialised.
(1) The amount of information needed for CPPC performance control in its
cpufreq driver depends on the domain (PSD) coordination type:
ANY: One set of CPPC control and capability data (e.g desired
performance, highest/lowest performance, etc) applies to all
CPUs in the domain.
ALL: Same as ANY. To be noted that this type is not currently
supported. When supported, information about which CPUs
belong to a domain is needed in order for frequency change
requests to be sent to each of them.
HW: It's necessary to store CPPC control and capability
information for all the CPUs. HW will then coordinate the
performance state based on their limitations and requests.
NONE: Same as HW. No HW coordination is expected.
Despite this, the previous initialisation code would indiscriminately
allocate memory for all CPUs (all_cpu_data) and unnecessarily
duplicate performance capabilities and the domain sharing mask and type
for each possible CPU.
(2) With the current per-cpu structure, when having ANY coordination,
the cppc_cpudata cpu information is not initialised (will remain 0)
for all CPUs in a policy, other than policy->cpu. When policy->cpu is
hotplugged out, the driver will incorrectly use the uninitialised (0)
value of the other CPUs when making frequency changes. Additionally,
the previous values stored in the perf_ctrls.desired_perf will be
lost when policy->cpu changes.
Therefore replace the array of per cpu data with a list. The memory for
each structure is allocated at policy init, where a single structure
can be allocated per policy, not per cpu. In order to accommodate the
struct list_head node in the cppc_cpudata structure, the now unused cpu
and cur_policy variables are removed.
For example, on a arm64 Juno platform with 6 CPUs: (0, 1, 2, 3) in PSD1,
(4, 5) in PSD2 - ANY coordination, the memory allocation comparison shows:
Before patch:
- ANY coordination:
total slack req alloc/free caller
0 0 0 0/1 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ff7810
0 0 0 0/6 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ff7808
128 80 48 1/0 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ffc070
768 0 768 6/0 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ffc0e4
After patch:
- ANY coordination:
total slack req alloc/free caller
256 0 256 2/0 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008fed410
0 0 0 0/2 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008fed274
Additional notes:
- A pointer to the policy's cppc_cpudata is stored in policy->driver_data
- Driver registration is skipped if _CPC entries are not present.
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Tested-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
For errors parsing the _PSD domains, a separate domain is returned for
each CPU in the failed _PSD domain with no coordination (as per previous
comment). But contrary to the intention, the code was setting
CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ALL as coordination type.
Change shared_type to CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_NONE in case of errors parsing
the domain information. The function still returns the error and the caller
is free to bail out the domain initialisation altogether in that case.
Given that both functions return domains with a single CPU, this change
does not affect the functionality, but clarifies the intention.
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject edit ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This is the first pass in creating the ability to calculate the
frequency invariance on AMD systems. This approach uses the CPPC
highest performance and nominal performance values that range from
0 - 255 instead of a high and base frquency. This is because we do
not have the ability on AMD to get a highest frequency value.
On AMD systems the highest performance and nominal performance
vaues do correspond to the highest and base frequencies for the system
so using them should produce an appropriate ratio but some tweaking
is likely necessary.
Due to CPPC being initialized later in boot than when the frequency
invariant calculation is currently made, I had to create a callback
from the CPPC init code to do the calculation after we have CPPC
data.
Special thanks to "kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>" for reporting that
compilation of drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c is conditional to
CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB, not just CONFIG_ACPI.
[ ggherdovich@suse.cz: made safe under CPU hotplug, edited changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201112182614.10700-2-ggherdovich@suse.cz
kobject_init_and_add() takes reference even when it fails.
If this function returns an error, kobject_put() must be called to
properly clean up the memory associated with the object. Previous
commit "b8eb718348b8" fixed a similar problem.
Fixes: 158c998ea4 ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance")
Signed-off-by: Qiushi Wu <wu000273@umn.edu>
Cc: 4.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.10+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Fix the following sparse warnings:
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:353:20: warning: symbol 'cppc_mbox_cl' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:600:5: warning: symbol 'pcc_data_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In acpi_get_psd_map() variable all_cpu_data[] can't be NULL and variable
match_cpc_ptr has been checked before, no need check again at the end of
the funchtion.
Some additional optimizations can be made on top of that.
Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
According to the ACPI 6.3 specification, the _PSD method is optional
when using CPPC. The underlying assumption is that each CPU can change
frequency independently from all other CPUs; _PSD is provided to tell
the OS that some processors can NOT do that.
However, the acpi_get_psd() function returns ENODEV if there is no _PSD
method present, or an ACPI error status if an error occurs when evaluating
_PSD, if present. This makes _PSD mandatory when using CPPC, in violation
of the specification, and only on Linux.
This has forced some firmware writers to provide a dummy _PSD, even though
it is irrelevant, but only because Linux requires it; other OSPMs follow
the spec. We really do not want to have OS specific ACPI tables, though.
So, correct acpi_get_psd() so that it does not return an error if there
is no _PSD method present, but does return a failure when the method can
not be executed properly. This allows _PSD to be optional as it should
be.
Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation version 2 of the license
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 315 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190115.503150771@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
As per the ACPI specification, "Guaranteed Performance Register" is
a "Buffer" field and it cannot be "Integer", so treat the "Integer"
type for "Guaranteed Performance Register" field as invalid and
ignore its value in that case.
Also save one cpc_read() call when "Guaranteed Performance Register"
is not present, which means a register defined as:
"Register(SystemMemory, 0, 0, 0, 0)".
Fixes: 29523f0953 ("ACPI / CPPC: Add support for guaranteed performance")
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: 4.20+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.20+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This patch add a helper to get the value of desired performance
register.
Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
[ rjw: More white space ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The Continuous Performance Control package may contain an optional
guaranteed performance field.
Add support to read guaranteed performance from _CPC.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
