Test case 71 'Convert perf time to TSC' is not supported on s390.
Subtest 71.1 is skipped with the correct message, but subtest 71.2 is
not skipped and fails.
The root cause is function evlist__open() called from
test__perf_time_to_tsc(). evlist__open() returns -ENOENT because the
event cycles:u is not supported by the selected PMU, for example
platform s390 on z/VM or an x86_64 virtual machine.
The PMU driver returns -ENOENT in this case. This error is leads to the
failure.
Fix this by returning TEST_SKIP on -ENOENT.
Output before:
71: Convert perf time to TSC:
71.1: TSC support: Skip (This architecture does not support)
71.2: Perf time to TSC: FAILED!
Output after:
71: Convert perf time to TSC:
71.1: TSC support: Skip (This architecture does not support)
71.2: Perf time to TSC: Skip (perf_read_tsc_conversion is not supported)
This also happens on an x86_64 virtual machine:
# uname -m
x86_64
$ ./perf test -F 71
71: Convert perf time to TSC :
71.1: TSC support : Ok
71.2: Perf time to TSC : FAILED!
$
Committer testing:
Continues to work on x86_64:
$ perf test 71
71: Convert perf time to TSC :
71.1: TSC support : Ok
71.2: Perf time to TSC : Ok
$
Fixes: 290fa68bdc ("perf test tsc: Fix error message when not supported")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Chengdong Li <chengdongli@tencent.com>
Cc: chengdongli@tencent.com
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220420062921.1211825-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Since commit bb30acae4c ("perf report: Bail out --mem-mode if mem
info is not available") "perf mem report" and "perf report --mem-mode"
don't report result if the PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC bit is missed in sample
type.
The commit ffab487052 ("perf: arm-spe: Fix perf report
--mem-mode") partially fixes the issue. It adds PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC
bit for Arm SPE event, this allows the perf data file generated by
kernel v5.18-rc1 or later version can be reported properly.
On the other hand, perf tool still fails to be backward compatibility
for a data file recorded by an older version's perf which contains Arm
SPE trace data. This patch is a workaround in reporting phase, when
detects ARM SPE PMU event and without PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC bit, it will
force to set the bit in the sample type and give a warning info.
Fixes: bb30acae4c ("perf report: Bail out --mem-mode if mem info is not available")
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Tested-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220414123201.842754-1-leo.yan@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The header TargetRegistry.h has moved in LLVM/clang 14.
Committer notes:
The problem as noticed when building in ubuntu:22.04:
90 98.61 ubuntu:22.04 : FAIL gcc version 11.2.0 (Ubuntu 11.2.0-19ubuntu1)
util/c++/clang.cpp:23:10: fatal error: llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h: No such file or directory
23 | #include "llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h"
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
Fixed after applying this patch.
Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Amadio <amadio@gentoo.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Link: https://twitter.com/GuilhermeAmadio/status/1514970524232921088
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Ylp0M/VYgHOxtcnF@gentoo.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The 'perf bench numa' testcase fails on systems with more than 1K CPUs.
Testcase: perf bench numa mem -p 1 -t 3 -P 512 -s 100 -zZ0qcm --thp 1
Snippet of code:
<<>>
perf: bench/numa.c:302: bind_to_node: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
<<>>
bind_to_node() uses "sched_getaffinity" to save the original cpumask and
this call is returning EINVAL ((invalid argument).
This happens because the default mask size in glibc is 1024. To
overcome this 1024 CPUs mask size limitation of cpu_set_t, change the
mask size using the CPU_*_S macros ie, use CPU_ALLOC to allocate
cpumask, CPU_ALLOC_SIZE for size.
Apart from fixing this for "orig_mask", apply same logic to "mask" as
well which is used to setaffinity so that mask size is large enough to
represent number of possible CPU's in the system.
sched_getaffinity is used in one more place in perf numa bench. It is in
"bind_to_cpu" function. Apply the same logic there also. Though
currently no failure is reported from there, it is ideal to change
getaffinity to work with such system configurations having CPU's more
than default mask size supported by glibc.
Also fix "sched_setaffinity" to use mask size which is large enough to
represent number of possible CPU's in the system.
Fixed all places where "bind_cpumask" which is part of "struct
thread_data" is used such that bind_cpumask works in all configuration.
Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220412164059.42654-3-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Perf numa bench test fails with error:
Testcase:
./perf bench numa mem -p 2 -t 1 -P 1024 -C 0,8 -M 1,0 -s 20 -zZq --thp 1 --no-data_rand_walk
Failure snippet:
<<>>
Running 'numa/mem' benchmark:
# Running main, "perf bench numa numa-mem -p 2 -t 1 -P 1024 -C 0,8 -M 1,0 -s 20 -zZq --thp 1 --no-data_rand_walk"
perf: bench/numa.c:333: bind_to_cpumask: Assertion `!(ret)' failed.
<<>>
The Testcases uses CPU's 0 and 8. In function "parse_setup_cpu_list",
There is check to see if cpu number is greater than max cpu's possible
in the system ie via "if (bind_cpu_0 >= g->p.nr_cpus || bind_cpu_1 >=
g->p.nr_cpus) {".
But it could happen that system has say 48 CPU's, but only number of
online CPU's is 0-7. Other CPU's are offlined. Since "g->p.nr_cpus" is
48, so function will go ahead and set bit for CPU 8 also in cpumask (
td->bind_cpumask).
bind_to_cpumask function is called to set affinity using
sched_setaffinity and the cpumask. Since the CPU8 is not present, set
affinity will fail here with EINVAL.
Fix this issue by adding a check to make sure that, CPU's provided in
the input argument values are online before proceeding further and skip
the test. For this, include new helper function "is_cpu_online" in
"tools/perf/util/header.c".
Since "BIT(x)" definition will get included from header.h, remove
that from bench/numa.c
Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220412164059.42654-2-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Fix incorrect debug message:
Attempting to add event pmu 'intel_pt' with '' that may result in
non-fatal errors
which always appears with perf record -vv and intel_pt e.g.
perf record -vv -e intel_pt//u uname
The message is incorrect because there will never be non-fatal errors.
Suppress the message if the PMU is 'selectable' i.e. meant to be
selected directly as an event.
Fixes: 4ac22b484d ("perf parse-events: Make add PMU verbose output clearer")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220411061758.2458417-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The `perf --list-cmds` output prints only internal commands, although
there is no reason for that from users' perspective.
Adding the external commands to commands array with NULL function
pointer allows printing all perf commands while not changing the logic
of command handler selection.
Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220404221541.30312-2-mpetlan@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The 'perf bench epoll' testcase fails on systems with more than 1K CPUs.
Testcase: perf bench epoll all
Result snippet:
<<>>
Run summary [PID 106497]: 1399 threads monitoring on 64 file-descriptors for 8 secs.
perf: pthread_create: No such file or directory
<<>>
In epoll benchmarks (ctl, wait) pthread_create is invoked in do_threads
from respective bench_epoll_* function. Though the logs shows direct
failure from pthread_create, the actual failure is from
"sched_setaffinity" returning EINVAL (invalid argument).
This happens because the default mask size in glibc is 1024. To overcome
this 1024 CPUs mask size limitation of cpu_set_t, change the mask size
using the CPU_*_S macros.
Patch addresses this by fixing all the epoll benchmarks to use CPU_ALLOC
to allocate cpumask, CPU_ALLOC_SIZE for size, and CPU_SET_S to set the
mask.
Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220406175113.87881-3-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The 'perf bench futex' testcase fails on systems with more than 1K CPUs.
Testcase: perf bench futex all
Failure snippet:
<<>>Running futex/hash benchmark...
perf: pthread_create: No such file or directory
<<>>
All the futex benchmarks (ie hash, lock-api, requeue, wake,
wake-parallel), pthread_create is invoked in respective bench_futex_*
function. Though the logs shows direct failure from pthread_create,
strace logs showed that actual failure is from "sched_setaffinity"
returning EINVAL (invalid argument).
This happens because the default mask size in glibc is 1024. To overcome
this 1024 CPUs mask size limitation of cpu_set_t, change the mask size
using the CPU_*_S macros.
Patch addresses this by fixing all the futex benchmarks to use CPU_ALLOC
to allocate cpumask, CPU_ALLOC_SIZE for size, and CPU_SET_S to set the
mask.
Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220406175113.87881-2-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Commit Fixes: b9f6fbb3b2 ("perf arm64: Inject missing frames when
using 'perf record --call-graph=fp'") intended to add a 'best effort'
DWARF unwind that improved the frame pointer stack in most scenarios.
It's expected that the unwind will fail sometimes, but this shouldn't be
reported as an error. It only works when the return address can be
determined from the contents of the link register alone.
Fix the error shown when the unwinder requires extra registers by adding
a new flag that suppresses error messages. This flag is not set in the
normal --call-graph=dwarf unwind mode so that behavior is not changed.
Fixes: b9f6fbb3b2 ("perf arm64: Inject missing frames when using 'perf record --call-graph=fp'")
Reported-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexandre Truong <alexandre.truong@arm.com>
Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220406145651.1392529-1-james.clark@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Namhyung Kim
Timothy Hayes
Adrian Hunter
Thomas Richter
Leo Yan
Guilherme Amadio
Athira Rajeev
Alexey Bayduraev
Lv Ruyi
Ian Rogers
Michael Petlan
Denis Nikitin
James Clark