For code which has not yet been converted from THP to folios, use the
compound size of the page instead of assuming PTE or PMD size.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
This function already required a head page to be passed, so this
just adds type-safety and removes a few implicit calls to
compound_head().
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Convert split_huge_pmd_address() at the same time since it only passes
the folio through, and its two callers already have a folio on hand.
Removes numerous calls to compound_head() and removes an assumption
that a page cannot be larger than a PMD.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
This is a convenience function; split_huge_page_to_list() can take
any page in a folio (and does so on purpose because that page will
be the one which keeps the refcount). But it's convenient for the
callers to pass the folio instead of the first page in the folio.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Add a predicate to determine if the folio might be mapped by a PMD entry.
If CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is disabled, we know it can't be, even
if it's large enough.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Move wait_for_stable_page() into the folio compatibility file.
folio_wait_stable() avoids a call to compound_head() and is 14 bytes
smaller than wait_for_stable_page() was. The net text size grows by 16
bytes as a result of this patch. We can also remove thp_head() as this
was the last user.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Pach series "mm: thp: use generic THP migration for NUMA hinting fault", v3.
When the THP NUMA fault support was added THP migration was not supported
yet. So the ad hoc THP migration was implemented in NUMA fault handling.
Since v4.14 THP migration has been supported so it doesn't make too much
sense to still keep another THP migration implementation rather than using
the generic migration code. It is definitely a maintenance burden to keep
two THP migration implementation for different code paths and it is more
error prone. Using the generic THP migration implementation allows us
remove the duplicate code and some hacks needed by the old ad hoc
implementation.
A quick grep shows x86_64, PowerPC (book3s), ARM64 ans S390 support both
THP and NUMA balancing. The most of them support THP migration except for
S390. Zi Yan tried to add THP migration support for S390 before but it
was not accepted due to the design of S390 PMD. For the discussion,
please see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/27/953.
Per the discussion with Gerald Schaefer in v1 it is acceptible to skip
huge PMD for S390 for now.
I saw there were some hacks about gup from git history, but I didn't
figure out if they have been removed or not since I just found FOLL_NUMA
code in the current gup implementation and they seems useful.
Patch #1 ~ #2 are preparation patches.
Patch #3 is the real meat.
Patch #4 ~ #6 keep consistent counters and behaviors with before.
Patch #7 skips change huge PMD to prot_none if thp migration is not supported.
Test
----
Did some tests to measure the latency of do_huge_pmd_numa_page. The test
VM has 80 vcpus and 64G memory. The test would create 2 processes to
consume 128G memory together which would incur memory pressure to cause
THP splits. And it also creates 80 processes to hog cpu, and the memory
consumer processes are bound to different nodes periodically in order to
increase NUMA faults.
The below test script is used:
echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
# Run stress-ng for 24 hours
./stress-ng/stress-ng --vm 2 --vm-bytes 64G --timeout 24h &
PID=$!
./stress-ng/stress-ng --cpu $NR_CPUS --timeout 24h &
# Wait for vm stressors forked
sleep 5
PID_1=`pgrep -P $PID | awk 'NR == 1'`
PID_2=`pgrep -P $PID | awk 'NR == 2'`
JOB1=`pgrep -P $PID_1`
JOB2=`pgrep -P $PID_2`
# Bind load jobs to different nodes periodically to force generate
# cross node memory access
while [ -d "/proc/$PID" ]
do
taskset -apc 8 $JOB1
taskset -apc 8 $JOB2
sleep 300
taskset -apc 58 $JOB1
taskset -apc 58 $JOB2
sleep 300
done
With the above test the histogram of latency of do_huge_pmd_numa_page is
as shown below. Since the number of do_huge_pmd_numa_page varies
drastically for each run (should be due to scheduler), so I converted the
raw number to percentage.
patched base
@us[stress-ng]:
[0] 3.57% 0.16%
[1] 55.68% 18.36%
[2, 4) 10.46% 40.44%
[4, 8) 7.26% 17.82%
[8, 16) 21.12% 13.41%
[16, 32) 1.06% 4.27%
[32, 64) 0.56% 4.07%
[64, 128) 0.16% 0.35%
[128, 256) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[256, 512) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[512, 1K) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[1K, 2K) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[2K, 4K) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[4K, 8K) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[8K, 16K) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[16K, 32K) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[32K, 64K) < 0.1% < 0.1%
Per the result, patched kernel is even slightly better than the base
kernel. I think this is because the lock contention against THP split is
less than base kernel due to the refactor.
To exclude the affect from THP split, I also did test w/o memory pressure.
No obvious regression is spotted. The below is the test result *w/o*
memory pressure.
patched base
@us[stress-ng]:
[0] 7.97% 18.4%
[1] 69.63% 58.24%
[2, 4) 4.18% 2.63%
[4, 8) 0.22% 0.17%
[8, 16) 1.03% 0.92%
[16, 32) 0.14% < 0.1%
[32, 64) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[64, 128) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[128, 256) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[256, 512) 0.45% 1.19%
[512, 1K) 15.45% 17.27%
[1K, 2K) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[2K, 4K) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[4K, 8K) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[8K, 16K) 0.86% 0.88%
[16K, 32K) < 0.1% 0.15%
[32K, 64K) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[64K, 128K) < 0.1% < 0.1%
[128K, 256K) < 0.1% < 0.1%
The series also survived a series of tests that exercise NUMA balancing
migrations by Mel.
This patch (of 7):
Add orig_pmd to struct vm_fault so the "orig_pmd" parameter used by huge
page fault could be removed, just like its PTE counterpart does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210518200801.7413-1-shy828301@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210518200801.7413-2-shy828301@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We tried to do something similar in b569a17607 ("userfaultfd: wp: drop
_PAGE_UFFD_WP properly when fork") previously, but it's not doing it all
right.. A few fixes around the code path:
1. We were referencing VM_UFFD_WP vm_flags on the _old_ vma rather
than the new vma. That's overlooked in b569a17607, so it won't work
as expected. Thanks to the recent rework on fork code
(7a4830c380), we can easily get the new vma now, so switch the
checks to that.
2. Dropping the uffd-wp bit in copy_huge_pmd() could be wrong if the
huge pmd is a migration huge pmd. When it happens, instead of using
pmd_uffd_wp(), we should use pmd_swp_uffd_wp(). The fix is simply to
handle them separately.
3. Forget to carry over uffd-wp bit for a write migration huge pmd
entry. This also happens in copy_huge_pmd(), where we converted a
write huge migration entry into a read one.
4. In copy_nonpresent_pte(), drop uffd-wp if necessary for swap ptes.
5. In copy_present_page() when COW is enforced when fork(), we also
need to pass over the uffd-wp bit if VM_UFFD_WP is armed on the new
vma, and when the pte to be copied has uffd-wp bit set.
Remove the comment in copy_present_pte() about this. It won't help a huge
lot to only comment there, but comment everywhere would be an overkill.
Let's assume the commit messages would help.
[peterx@redhat.com: fix a few thp pmd missing uffd-wp bit]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210428225030.9708-4-peterx@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210428225030.9708-3-peterx@redhat.com
Fixes: b569a17607 ("userfaultfd: wp: drop _PAGE_UFFD_WP properly when fork")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Differentiate between hardware not supporting hugepages and user disabling
THP via 'echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled'
For the devdax namespace, the kernel handles the above via the
supported_alignment attribute and failing to initialize the namespace if
the namespace align value is not supported on the platform.
For the fsdax namespace, the kernel will continue to initialize the
namespace. This can result in the kernel creating a huge pte entry even
though the hardware don't support the same.
We do want hugepage support with pmem even if the end-user disabled THP
via sysfs file (/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled). Hence
differentiate between hardware/firmware lacking support vs user-controlled
disable of THP and prevent a huge fault if the hardware lacks hugepage
support.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210205023956.417587-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The thp prefix is more frequently used than hpage and we should be
consistent between the various functions.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix mm/migrate.c]
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200629151959.15779-6-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Pull drm hugepage support from Dave Airlie:
"This adds support for hugepages to TTM and has been tested with the
vmwgfx drivers, though I expect other drivers to start using it"
* tag 'drm-next-2020-04-03-1' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm:
drm/vmwgfx: Hook up the helpers to align buffer objects
drm/vmwgfx: Introduce a huge page aligning TTM range manager
drm: Add a drm_get_unmapped_area() helper
drm/vmwgfx: Support huge page faults
drm/ttm, drm/vmwgfx: Support huge TTM pagefaults
mm: Add vmf_insert_pfn_xxx_prot() for huge page-table entries
mm: Split huge pages on write-notify or COW
mm: Introduce vma_is_special_huge
fs: Constify vma argument to vma_is_dax
Miaohe Lin
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
Yang Shi
Peter Xu
Hugh Dickins
Aneesh Kumar K.V
Ralph Campbell
yuleixzhang
Yang Shi
Wei Yang
Michel Lespinasse
Linus Torvalds