Currently ext4_fc_track_template() checks, whether the trace event
path belongs to replay or does sb has ineligible set, if yes it simply
returns. This patch pulls those checks before calling
ext4_fc_track_template() in the callers of ext4_fc_track_template().
[ Add checks to ext4_rename() which calls the __ext4_fc_track_*()
functions directly. -- TYT ]
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3cd025d9c490218a92e6d8fb30b6123e693373e3.1647057583.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
in the follow scenario:
1. jbd start transaction n
2. task A get new handle for transaction n+1
3. task A do some actions and add inode to FC_Q_MAIN fc_q
4. jbd complete transaction n and clear FC_Q_MAIN fc_q
5. task A call fsync
Fast commit will lost the file actions during a full commit.
we should also add updates to staging queue during a full commit.
and in ext4_fc_cleanup(), when reset a inode's fc track range, check
it's i_sync_tid, if it bigger than current transaction tid, do not
rest it, or we will lost the track range.
And EXT4_MF_FC_COMMITTING is not needed anymore, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220117093655.35160-3-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
For the follow scenario:
1. jbd start commit transaction n
2. task A get new handle for transaction n+1
3. task A do some ineligible actions and mark FC_INELIGIBLE
4. jbd complete transaction n and clean FC_INELIGIBLE
5. task A call fsync
In this case fast commit will not fallback to full commit and
transaction n+1 also not handled by jbd.
Make ext4_fc_mark_ineligible() also record transaction tid for
latest ineligible case, when call ext4_fc_cleanup() check
current transaction tid, if small than latest ineligible tid
do not clear the EXT4_MF_FC_INELIGIBLE.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220117093655.35160-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
During fast commit replay procedure, we clear inode blocks bitmap in
ext4_ext_clear_bb(), this may cause ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple() allocate
blocks still in use.
Make ext4_fc_record_regions() also record physical disk regions used by
inodes during replay procedure. Then ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple() can
excludes these blocks in use.
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220110035141.1980-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
For now ,we use ext4_punch_hole() during fast commit replay delete range
procedure. But it will be affected by inode->i_size, which may not
correct during fast commit replay procedure. The following test will
failed.
-create & write foo (len 1000K)
-falloc FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE foo (range 400K - 600K)
-create & fsync bar
-falloc FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE foo (range 300K-500K)
-fsync foo
-crash before a full commit
After the fast_commit reply procedure, the range 400K-500K will not be
removed. Because in this case, when calling ext4_punch_hole() the
inode->i_size is 0, and it just retruns with doing nothing.
Change to use ext4_ext_remove_space() instead of ext4_punch_hole()
to remove blocks of inode directly.
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211223032337.5198-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Since there are no blocks in an inline data inode, there's no point in
fixing iblocks field in fast commit replay path for this inode.
Similarly, there's no point in fixing any block bitmaps / global block
counters with respect to such an inode. Just bail out from these
functions if an inline data inode is encountered.
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211015182513.395917-2-harshads@google.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
During the commit phase in fast commits if an inode with inline data
is being committed, also commit the inline data along with
inode. Since recovery code just blindly copies entire content found in
inode TLV, there is no change needed on the recovery path. Thus, this
change is backward compatiable.
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211015182513.395917-1-harshads@google.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Now EXT4_FC_TAG_ADD_RANGE uses ext4_extent to track the
newly-added blocks, but the limit on the max value of
ee_len field is ignored, and it can lead to BUG_ON as
shown below when running command "fallocate -l 128M file"
on a fast_commit-enabled fs:
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/ext4_extents.h:199!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 3 PID: 624 Comm: fallocate Not tainted 5.14.0-rc6+ #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
RIP: 0010:ext4_fc_write_inode_data+0x1f3/0x200
Call Trace:
? ext4_fc_write_inode+0xf2/0x150
ext4_fc_commit+0x93b/0xa00
? ext4_fallocate+0x1ad/0x10d0
ext4_sync_file+0x157/0x340
? ext4_sync_file+0x157/0x340
vfs_fsync_range+0x49/0x80
do_fsync+0x3d/0x70
__x64_sys_fsync+0x14/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Simply fixing it by limiting the number of blocks
in one EXT4_FC_TAG_ADD_RANGE TLV.
Fixes: aa75f4d3da ("ext4: main fast-commit commit path")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210820044505.474318-1-houtao1@huawei.com
Fast commit recovery data on disk may not be aligned. So, when the
recovery code reads it, this patch makes sure that fast commit info
found on-disk is first memcpy-ed into an aligned variable before
accessing it. As a consequence of it, we also remove some macros that
could resulted in unaligned accesses.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: 8016e29f43 ("ext4: fast commit recovery path")
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210519215920.2037527-1-harshads@google.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Using no_printk() for jbd_debug() revealed two warnings:
fs/jbd2/recovery.c: In function 'fc_do_one_pass':
fs/jbd2/recovery.c:256:30: error: format '%d' expects a matching 'int' argument [-Werror=format=]
256 | jbd_debug(3, "Processing fast commit blk with seq %d");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/ext4/fast_commit.c: In function 'ext4_fc_replay_add_range':
fs/ext4/fast_commit.c:1732:30: error: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int' [-Werror=format=]
1732 | jbd_debug(1, "Converting from %d to %d %lld",
The first one was added incorrectly, and was also missing a few newlines
in debug output, and the second one happened when the type of an
argument changed.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: d556435156 ("jbd2: avoid -Wempty-body warnings")
Fixes: 6db0746189 ("ext4: use BIT() macro for BH_** state bits")
Fixes: 5b849b5f96 ("jbd2: fast commit recovery path")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210409201211.1866633-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Ritesh Harjani
Xin Yin
luo penghao
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Harshad Shirwadkar
Hou Tao
Guoqing Jiang
Arnd Bergmann