The "rpm" has been kept for backward compatibility since pre-git era.
I am planning to remove it after the Linux 4.18 release. Annouce the
end of the support, prompting to use "rpm-pkg" instead.
If you use "rpm", it will work like "rpm-pkg", but warning messages
will be displayed as follows:
WARNING: "rpm" target will be removed after Linux 4.18
Please use "rpm-pkg" instead.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
For rpm-pkg and deb-pkg, a source tar file is created. All paths in
the archive must be prefixed with the base name of the tar so that
everything is contained in the directory when you extract it.
Currently, scripts/package/Makefile uses a symlink for that, and
removes it after the tar is created.
If you terminate the build during the tar creation, the symlink is
left over. Then, at the next package build, you will see a warning
like follows:
ln: '.' and 'kernel-4.14.0+/.' are the same file
It is possible to fix it by adding -n (--no-dereference) option to
the "ln" command, but a cleaner way is to use --transform option
of "tar" command. This option is GNU extension, but it should not
hurt to use it in the Linux build system.
The 'S' flag is needed to exclude symlinks from the path fixup.
Without it, symlinks in the kernel are broken.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
The spec file always passes %{?_smp_mflags}, but we have two
problems here.
[1] "make -jN rpm-pkg" emits the following warning message:
make[2]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
[2] We can not specify the number of jobs that run in parallel.
Whether we give -jN or not from the top Makefile, the spec file
always passes ${?_smp_mflags} to the build commands.
${?_smp_mflags} will be useful when we run rpmbuild by hand. When we
invoke it from Makefile, -jN is propagated down to submake; it should
not be overridden because we want to respect the number of jobs given
by the user. Set _smp_mflags to empty string in this case.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
If build fails during (bin)rpm-pkg, the spec file is not cleaned by
anyone until the next successful build of the package.
We do not have to immediately delete the spec file in case somebody
may want to take a look at it. Instead, make them ignored by git,
and cleaned up by make mrproper.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
If "make rpm-pkg" or "make binrpm-pkg" is run with -j[jobs] option,
the following warning message is displayed.
warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add '+' to parent make rule.
Follow the suggestion.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
The "Release:" field of the spec file is determined based on the
.version file.
However, the .version file is not copied to the source tar file.
So, when we build the kernel from the source package, the UTS_VERSION
always indicates #1. This does not match with "rpm -q".
The kernel UTS_VERSION and "rpm -q" do not agree for binrpm-pkg, either.
Please note the kernel has already been built before the spec file is
created. Currently, mkspec invokes mkversion. This script returns an
incremented version. So, the "Release:" field of the spec file is
greater than the version in the kernel by one.
For the source package build (where .version file is missing), we can
give KBUILD_BUILD_VERSION=%{release} to the build command.
For the binary package build, we can simply read out the .version file
because it contains the version number that was used for building the
kernel image.
We can remove scripts/mkversion because scripts/package/Makefile need
not touch the .version file.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
After commit 21a59991ce ("scripts/package/Makefile: rpmbuild is needed
for rpm targets"), it is no longer possible to specify RPMOPTS.
For example, we can no longer able to control _topdir using the following
make command.
make RPMOPTS="--define '_topdir /home/xyz/workspace/'" binrpm-pkg
Fixes: 21a59991ce ("scripts/package/Makefile: rpmbuild is needed for rpm targets")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.3+
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
building with $srctree != $objtree, perf-tar-* targets fail
to read the MANIFEST file and add the PERF-VERSION-FILE needed
by out-of-tree builds. The build errors and an incorrect tar is created:
$ make O=build-x86 perf-targz-src-pkg
TAR
cat: ../tools/perf/MANIFEST: No such file or directory
tar: perf-4.1.0-rc8/PERF-VERSION-FILE: Cannot stat: No such file or
dir..
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
Kbuild sets objtree to "." and srctree to ".." The command to output
MANIFEST becomes:
$(cd ..; echo $(cat ../tools/perf/MANIFEST))
Without MANIFEST, the entire kernel source tree is added to the perf
source tarball. The *correct* fix is to keep the cd and remove srctree
from cat command line since MANIFEST has wildcards that fail to expand
working directory isn't srctree.
Second, PERF-VERSION-FILE gets not added, because in-tree build path is
hardcoded to Makefile:
util/PERF-VERSION-GEN ../../$(perf-tar)/ 2>/dev/null)
The PERF-VERSION-GEN needs to be run from tools/perf directory,
and the output directory needs to be changed from relative to
to absolute. This can be achieved using the $(CURDIR) variable.
Also remove the error redirect to /dev/null which hid the error.
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
Make deb-pkg build both source and binary package like make rpm-pkg does.
For people who only need binary kernel package, there is now bindeb-pkg
target, same target also used to build the .deb files if built from the
source package using dpkg-buildpackage.
Generated source package will build the same kernel .config than what
was available for make deb-pkg. The name of the source package can
be set with KDEB_SOURCENAME enviroment variable.
The source package is useful for GPL compliance, or for feeding to a
automated debian package builder.
Cc: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: maximilian attems <maks@stro.at>
Reviewed-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
Split source tarball creation from rpm-pkg target
so it can be used from deb-pkg target as well. As
added bonus, we can now pretty print TAR the name of
tarball created in quiet mode
This patch prepares the groundwork for deb-pkg source
package adding bit.
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
Before rpm release 4.1, in 2002, either the rpm command or the
rpmbuild command could be used in the rpm-pkg or binrpm-pkg targets,
and the Makefile chose the rpm command if the rpmbuild command wasn't
found.
After release 4.1, however, the rpm command could no longer be used in
place of the rpmbuild command. As the rpmbuild command is not
installed by default, this can lead to failures with the rpm-pkg and
binrpm-pkg targets:
rpm --define "_builddir ." --target \
x86_64 -bb ./binkernel.spec
rpm --target: unknown option
scripts/package/Makefile:60: recipe for target 'binrpm-pkg' failed
Change the Makefile to use rpmbuild unconditionally to avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
When building perf out of tree:
$ make perf-tar-src-pkg
$ tar -xf perf-<ver>.tar -C /tmp
$ cd /tmp/perf<ver>
$ make -C tools/perf
you get this warning message:
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `kernelversion'. Stop.
Fix it by saving the perf version in the tar file and using that for the
out of tree builds.
v2: removed short form request and fixed up version string from usual output.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1383753335-25782-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Commit 6501320311 dropped the rpm spec as a
prerequisite for the binrpm-pkg target but forgot to update $< usage,
which causes the rule to break.
This commit fixes that by replacing $< with the spec name.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
The *pkg targets are always run, so it makes no sense to cache the
generated specfile. This also fixes build errors when the specfile
becomes out of date, without the Makefile noticing it:
$ make rpm
works
$ echo yadadada >localversion-test
$ make rpm
fails, because kernel.spec assumes the old kernel release string
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Now that we only package explicitly listed files to the tarball, there
is no need to abuse the parent directory.
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
The source tree can contain lots of uninteresting data like tag or
cscope files, packaging which slows down make rpm needlessly. It can
also break the build, if the tree contains an unrelated file named
*.spec. The downside of this change is that new subdirectories have to
be added to the KBUILD_ALLDIRS variable in the top-level Makefile. The
upside is that the behavior is more predictable.
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
KBUILD_OUTPUT is always empty here, so it is useless to test it. But
while use O=.., objtree and srctree will be different. I compare them
instead.
Signed-off-by: Bin Wang <wbin00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Specify --git-dir when building perf targets to allow out-of-tree
builds using O=<build-dir>.
The shell command in `git archive' had to be modified to allow proper
file name expansion of the files listed in MANIFEST.
Signed-off-by: matt mooney <mfm@muteddisk.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
The better fix would be to stop using the parent directory (principle of
least surprise), but as long as we use it, use it consistently.
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Removing the '-' results in hard to read filenames such as:
kernel-2.6.35.2000042g76e4caf-28.x86_64.rpm
kernel-2.6.35.2_000042_g76e4caf-28.x86_64.rpm is easier to
read.
Signed-off-by: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
