Add a convenience macro for iterating over graph endpoints. Iterating over
graph endpoints using fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() is a recurring
pattern, and this macro allows calling that function in a slightly more
convenient way. For instance,
for (child = NULL;
(child = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(fwnode, child)); )
becomes
fwnode_graph_for_each_endpoint(fwnode, child)
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The fwnode_handle_get() function is used to obtain a reference to an
fwnode. A common usage pattern for the OF equivalent of the function is:
mynode = of_node_get(node);
Similarly make fwnode_handle_get() return the fwnode to which the
reference was obtained.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The new fwnode_property_get_reference_args() interface amends the fwnode
property API with the functionality of both of_parse_phandle_with_args()
and __acpi_node_get_property_reference().
The semantics is slightly different: the cells property is ignored on ACPI
as the number of arguments can be explicitly obtained from the firmware
interface.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Similar to OF endpoints, endpoint type nodes can be also supported on
ACPI. In order to make it possible for drivers to ignore the matter,
add a type for fwnode_endpoint and a function to parse them.
On ACPI, find the child node index instead of relying on the "endpoint"
property.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The function to obtain a fwnode related to a struct device is useful for
drivers that use the fwnode property API: it allows not being aware of the
underlying firmware implementation.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
fwnode_handle_get() is used to obtain a reference to a fwnode_handle
container. In this case this is OF specific struct device_node.
This complements fwnode_handle_put() which is already implemented.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This follows DT implementation of of_graph_* APIs but we call them
fwnode_graph_* instead. For DT nodes the existing of_graph_* implementation
will be used. For ACPI we use the new ACPI graph implementation instead.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Since now we have means to enumerate all children of any fwnode even in
ACPI we can implement fwnode_get_named_child_node(). This is similar than
device_get_named_child_node() with the exception that it can be called to
any fwnode handle. Make device_get_named_child_node() call directly this
new function.
This is useful in cases where we need to be able to find child nodes which
are not direct descendants of the parent device.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The ACPI _DSD hierarchical data extension makes it possible to have
hierarchies deeper than one level in similar way than DT allows. These
"subsubnodes" have not been accessible because device property
implementation only provides device_get_next_child_node() that is limited
to direct descendants of a device.
We need this ability in order support things like remote endpoints
currently supported in DT with of_graph_* APIs.
Modify acpi_get_next_subnode() to accept fwnode handle instead and update
callers accordingly. Also add a new function fwnode_get_next_child_node()
that works directly with fwnodes and modify device_get_next_child_node() to
call it directly. While there add a macro fwnode_for_each_child_node()
analogous to the current device_for_each_child_node() but it works with
fwnodes instead of devices.
Link: http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-hierarchical-data-extension-UUID-v1.pdf
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Now that ACPI has support for returning parent firmware node for both types
of nodes we can expose this to others as well. This adds a new function
fwnode_get_parent() that can be used for DT and ACPI nodes to retrieve the
parent firmware node.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
When augmenting ACPI-enumerated devices with additional property data based
on DMI info, a module has often several potential property sets, with only
one being active on a given box. In order to save memory it should be
possible to mark everything and __initdata or __initconst, execute DMI
match early, and duplicate relevant properties. Then kernel will discard
the rest of them.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Data that is fed into property arrays should not be modified, so let's mark
relevant pointers as const. This will allow us making source arrays as
const/__initconst.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There is no reason why statically defined properties should be modifiable,
so let's make device_add_properties() and the rest of pset_*() functions to
take const pointers to properties.
This will allow us to mark properties as const/__initconst at definition
sites.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This fixes commit d76eebfa17 ("include/linux/property.h: fix build
issues with gcc-4.4.4").
With that commit we get the following compile error when using the
PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY macro.
include/linux/property.h:201:39: error: `u32_data' undeclared (first
use in this function)
PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY(_name_, u32, _val_)
^
include/linux/property.h:193:17: note: in definition of macro
`PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY'
{ .pointer = { _type_##_data = _val_ } }, \
^
This needs a '.' to reference the union member. It seems this was just
overlooked here since it is done correctly in similar constructs in
other parts of the original commit.
This fix is in preparation of upcoming commits that will use this macro.
Fixes: commit d76eebfa17 ("include/linux/property.h: fix build issues with gcc-4.4.4")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2de3b929290d88a723ed829a3e3cbd02044714df.1475114627.git.johnyoun@synopsys.com
Signed-off-by: John Youn <johnyoun@synopsys.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
For device nodes in both DT and ACPI, it possible to have named
child nodes which contain properties (an existing example being
gpio-leds). This adds a function to find a named child node for
a device which can be used by drivers for property retrieval.
For DT data node name matching, of_node_cmp() and similar functions
are made available outside of CONFIG_OF block so the new function
can reference these for DT and non-DT builds.
For ACPI data node name matching, a helper function is also added
which returns false if CONFIG_ACPI is not set, otherwise it
performs a string comparison on the data node name. This avoids
using the acpi_data_node struct for non CONFIG_ACPI builds,
which would otherwise cause a build failure.
Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Acked-by: Sathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of
the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always
hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the
drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The
function can just create the instance of it on its own and
bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot.
This renames device_add_property_set() to
device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct
property_entry as its parameter instead of struct
property_set.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
gcc-4.4.4 has problems with initialization of anonymous unions:
drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c:30: error: unknown field 'value' specified in initializer
work around this by crafting the initializers in a manner which the
compiler can handle.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
It is convenient if the property set associated with the device secondary
firmware node is a copy of the original. This allows passing property set
from a stack for example for devices created dynamically. This also ties
the property set lifetime to the associated device.
Because of that we provide new function device_remove_property_set() that
is used to disassociate and release memory allocated for the property set.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
