The value of blocking_readers is increased only when the lock is taken
for read, no way we can fail the condition with the write lock.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The replace_wait and bio_counter were mistakenly added to fs_info in
commit c404e0dc2c ("Btrfs: fix use-after-free in the finishing
procedure of the device replace"), but they logically belong to
fs_info::dev_replace. Besides, bio_counter is a very generic name and is
confusing in bare fs_info context.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The exit sequence in btrfs_dev_replace_start does not allow to simply
add a label to the right place so the error handling after starting
transaction failure jumps there. Currently there's a lock that pairs
with the unlock in the section, which is unnecessary and only raises
questions. Add a variable to track the locking status and avoid the
extra locking.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There's a single caller and the function name does not say it's actually
taking the lock, so open coding makes it more explicit.
For now, btrfs_dev_replace_read_lock is used instead of read_lock so
it's paired with the unlocking wrapper in the same block.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This member seems to be copied from the extent_buffer locking scheme and
is at least used to assert that the read lock/unlock is properly nested.
In some way. While the _inc/_dec are called inside the read lock
section, the asserts are both inside and outside, so the ordering is not
guaranteed and we can see read/inc/dec ordered in any way
(theoretically).
A missing call of btrfs_dev_replace_clear_lock_blocking could cause
unexpected read_locks count, so this at least looks like a valid
assertion, but this will become unnecessary with later updates.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When we fail to start a transaction in btrfs_dev_replace_start, we leave
dev_replace->replace_start set to STARTED but clear ->srcdev and
->tgtdev. Later, that can result in an Oops in
btrfs_dev_replace_progress when having state set to STARTED or SUSPENDED
implies that ->srcdev is valid.
Also fix error handling when the state is already STARTED or SUSPENDED
while starting. That, too, will clear ->srcdev and ->tgtdev even though
it doesn't own them. This should be an impossible case to hit since we
should be protected by the BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP bit being set. Let's add an
ASSERT there while we're at it.
Fixes: e93c89c1aa (Btrfs: add new sources for device replace code)
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of returning an error value and using one of the parameters for
returning the actual object we are interested in just refactor the
function to directly return btrfs_device *. Also bubble up the error
handling for the special BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_MISSING_NOT_FOUND value into
btrfs_rm_device. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
on-disk devs stats value is updated in btrfs_run_dev_stats(),
which is called during commit transaction, if device->dev_stats_ccnt
is not zero.
Since current replace operation does not touch dev_stats_ccnt,
on-disk dev stats value is not updated. Therefore "btrfs device stats"
may return old device's value after umount/mount
(Example: See "btrfs ins dump-t -t DEV $DEV" after btrfs/100 finish).
Fix this by just incrementing dev_stats_ccnt in
btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() when replace is succeeded and this will
update the values.
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always passed a well-formed tgtdevice so the fs_info
can be referenced from there.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The get_seconds() function is deprecated as it truncates the timestamp
to 32 bits. Change it to or ktime_get_real_seconds().
Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_dev_replace_finishing updates devices (soruce and target) which
are within the btrfs_fs_devices::devices or withint the cloned seed
devices (btrfs_fs_devices::seed::devices), so we don't need the global
uuid_mutex.
The device replace context is also locked by its own locks.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Use the wrappers and reduce the amount of low-level details about the
waitqueue management.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This parameter was introduced alongside the function in
eb73c1b7ce ("Btrfs: introduce per-subvolume delalloc inode list") to
avoid deadlocks since this function was used in the transaction commit
path. However, commit 8d875f95da ("btrfs: disable strict file flushes
for renames and truncates") removed that usage, rendering the parameter
obsolete.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The volume mutex does not protect against anything in this case, the
comment about scrub is right but not related to locking and looks
confusing. The comment in btrfs_find_device_missing_or_by_path is wrong
and confusing too.
The device_list_mutex is not held here to protect device lookup, but in
this case device replace cannot run in parallel with device removal (due
to exclusive op protection), so we don't need further locking here.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The device replace is paused by unmount or read only remount, and
resumed on next mount or write remount.
The exclusive status should be checked properly as it's a global
invariant and we must not allow 2 operations run. In this case, the
balance can be also paused and resumed under same conditions. It's
always checked first so dev-replace could see the EXCL_OP already taken,
BUT, the ioctl would never let start both at the same time.
Replace the WARN_ON with message and return 0, indicating no error as
this is purely theoretical and the user will be informed. Resolving that
manually should be possible by waiting for the other operation to finish
or cancel the paused state.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function logically belongs there and there's only a single caller,
no need to export it. No code changes.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This is a preparatory cleanup that will make clear that the only
successful way out of btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev will also set the
device_out to a valid pointer. With this guarantee, the callers can be
simplified.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function is called once and is fairly small, we can merge it with
the caller.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Remove GPL boilerplate text (long, short, one-line) and keep the rest,
ie. personal, company or original source copyright statements. Add the
SPDX header.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The current calls are unclear in what way btrfs_dev_replace_lock takes
the locks, so drop the argument, split the helpers and use similar
naming as for read and write locks.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For debugging or administration purposes, we would want to know if and
when the user cancels the replace, to complement the existing messages
when dev-replace starts or finishes.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog, fold fix for RCU warning from Nikolay ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
David Sterba
Jeff Mahoney
Nikolay Borisov
Misono Tomohiro
Allen Pais
Anand Jain