Add device managed APIs devm_pinctrl_register() and
devm_pinctrl_unregister() for the APIs pinctrl_register()
and pinctrl_unregister().
This helps in reducing code in error path and sometimes
removal of .remove callback for driver unbind.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Only this member, pins, is defined as "struct ... const *", but the
others in this struct, pinlops, pmxops, confops, etc. are defined as
"const struct ... *".
Swap the "struct pinctrl_pin_desc" and "const" for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
While the pinmux_ops are ideally just a vtable for pin mux
calls, the "strict" setting belongs so intuitively with the
pin multiplexing that we should move it here anyway. Putting
it in the top pinctrl_desc makes no sense.
Cc: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Disallow simultaneous use of the the GPIO and peripheral mux
functions by setting a flag "strict" in struct pinctrl_desc.
The blackfin pinmux and gpio controller doesn't allow user to
set up a pin for both GPIO and peripheral function. So, add flag
strict in struct pinctrl_desc to check both gpio_owner and
mux_owner before approving the pin request.
v2-changes:
- if strict flag is set, check gpio_owner and mux_onwer in if and
else clause
v3-changes:
- add kerneldoc for this struct
- augment Documentation/pinctrl.txt
Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
New pin controllers such as ACPI-based may also have custom properties
to parse, and should be able to use generic pin config. Let's make the
code compile on !OF systems and rename members a bit to underscore it
is custom parameters and not necessarily DT parameters.
This fixes a build regression for x86_64 on the zeroday kernel builds.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Additionally to the generic DT parameters, allow drivers to provide
driver-specific DT parameters to be used with the generic parser
infrastructure.
To achieve this 'struct pinctrl_desc' is extended to pass custom pinconf
option to the core. In order to pass this kind of information, the
related data structures - 'struct pinconf_generic_dt_params',
'pin_config_item' - are moved from pinconf internals to the
pinconf-generic header.
Additionally pinconfg-generic is refactored to not only iterate over the
generic pinconf parameters but also take the parameters into account
that are provided through the driver's 'struct pinctrl_desc'.
In particular 'pinconf_generic_parse_dt_config()' and
'pinconf_generic_dump' helpers are split into two parts each. In order
to have a more generic helper that can be used to process the generic
parameters as well as the driver-specific ones.
v2:
- fix typo
- add missing documentation for @conf_items member in struct
- rebase to pinctrl/devel: conflict in abx500
- rename _pinconf_generic_dump() to pinconf_generic_dump_one()
- removed '_' from _parse_dt_cfg()
- removed BUG_ONs, error condition is handled in if statements
- removed pinconf_generic_dump_group() & pinconf_generic_dump_pin
helpers
- fixed up corresponding call sites
- renamed pinconf_generic_dump() to pinconf_generic_dump_pins()
- added kernel-doc to pinconf_generic_dump_pins()
- add kernel-doc
- more verbose commit message
Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This patch adds the infrastructure required to register non-linear gpio
ranges through gpiolib and the standard GPIO device tree bindings.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The comment introduced with the recently added pinctrl_gpio_range.pins
element was wrong. This corrects it.
Thanks to Patrice Chotard for pointing this out.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Traditionally, GPIO ranges are based on consecutive ranges of both GPIO
and pin numbers. This patch allows for GPIO ranges with arbitrary lists
of pin numbers.
Signed-off-by: Christian Ruppert <christian.ruppert@abilis.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Add new function to get devname from pinctrl_dev. pinctrl_dev_get_name()
can only get pinctrl description name. If we want to use gpio driver to
find pinctrl device node, we need to fetch the pinctrl device name.
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This adds a function to the pinctrl core to retrieve the GPIO
range associated with a certain pin for a certain controller.
This is needed when a pinctrl driver want to look up the
corresponding struct gpio_chip for a certain pin. As the
GPIO drivers can now create these ranges themselves, the
pinctrl driver no longer knows about all its associated GPIO
chips.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Rename the function find_pinctrl_and_add_gpio_range()
to pinctrl_find_and_add_gpio_range() so as to be consistent
with the rest of the functions.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The fact that of_gpiochip_add_pin_range() and
gpiochip_add_pin_range() share too much code is fragile and
will invariably mean that bugs need to be fixed in two places
instead of one.
So separate the concerns of gpiolib.c and gpiolib-of.c and
have the latter call the former as back-end. This is necessary
also when going forward with other device descriptions such
as ACPI.
This is done by:
- Adding a return code to gpiochip_add_pin_range() so we can
reliably check whether this succeeds.
- Get rid of the custom of_pinctrl_add_gpio_range() from
pinctrl. Instead create of_pinctrl_get() to just retrive the
pin controller per se from an OF node. This composite
function was just begging to be deleted, it was way to
purpose-specific.
- Use pinctrl_dev_get_name() to get the name of the retrieved
pin controller and use that to call back into the generic
gpiochip_add_pin_range().
Now the pin range is only allocated and tied to a pin
controller from the core implementation in gpiolib.c.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
pinctrl subsystem needs gpio chip base to prepare set of gpio
pin ranges, which a given pinctrl driver can handle. This is
important to handle pinctrl gpio request calls in order to
program a given pin properly for gpio operation.
As gpio base is allocated dynamically during gpiochip
registration, presently there exists no clean way to pass this
information to the pinctrl subsystem.
After few discussions from [1], it was concluded that may be
gpio controller reporting the pin range it supports, is a
better way than pinctrl subsystem directly registering it.
[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/184816
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
[Edited documentation a bit]
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This reverts earlier commit which removed
pinctrl_remove_gpio_range(), because at that time there
weren't any more users of that routine. It was removed as the
removal of ranges was done in unregister of pinctrl.
But as we are now registering stuff from gpiolib, we may
remove and insert a gpio module multiple times. So, we
need this routine again.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Most of the SoC drivers implement list_groups() and list_functions()
routines for pinctrl and pinmux. These routines continue returning
zero until the selector argument is greater than total count of
available groups or functions.
This patch replaces these list_*() routines with get_*_count()
routines, which returns the number of available selection for SoC
driver. pinctrl layer will use this value to check the range it can
choose.
This patch fixes all user drivers for this change. There are other
routines in user drivers, which have checks to check validity of
selector passed to them. It is also no more required and hence
removed.
Documentation updated as well.
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
[Folded in fix and fixed a minor merge artifact manually]
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
During pinctrl_get(), if the client device has a device tree node, look
for the common pinctrl properties there. If found, parse the referenced
device tree nodes, with the help of the pinctrl drivers, and generate
mapping table entries from them.
During pinctrl_put(), free any results of device tree parsing.
Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Add a dummy declaration of struct device to avoid the following warning:
In file included from include/linux/pinctrl/machine.h:15:0,
from arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-pinmux.h:18,
from arch/arm/mach-tegra/board-trimslice-pinmux.c:20:
include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h:115:12: warning: 'struct device' declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h:115:12: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default]
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Move the pin control state defines into its own header file,
since it is used both by machine.h which is facing the platform
and by consumer.h which is facing the drivers, and pinctrl.h
which is pinctrl-driver internal, let's not have each and every
.h file include all others, then isolation is moot.
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
