Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o:
"Add new ioctls to set and get the file system UUID in the ext4
superblock and improved the performance of the online resizing of file
systems with bigalloc enabled.
Fixed a lot of bugs, in particular for the inline data feature,
potential races when creating and deleting inodes with shared extended
attribute blocks, and the handling of directory blocks which are
corrupted"
* tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (37 commits)
ext4: add ioctls to get/set the ext4 superblock uuid
ext4: avoid resizing to a partial cluster size
ext4: reduce computation of overhead during resize
jbd2: fix assertion 'jh->b_frozen_data == NULL' failure when journal aborted
ext4: block range must be validated before use in ext4_mb_clear_bb()
mbcache: automatically delete entries from cache on freeing
mbcache: Remove mb_cache_entry_delete()
ext2: avoid deleting xattr block that is being reused
ext2: unindent codeblock in ext2_xattr_set()
ext2: factor our freeing of xattr block reference
ext4: fix race when reusing xattr blocks
ext4: unindent codeblock in ext4_xattr_block_set()
ext4: remove EA inode entry from mbcache on inode eviction
mbcache: add functions to delete entry if unused
mbcache: don't reclaim used entries
ext4: make sure ext4_append() always allocates new block
ext4: check if directory block is within i_size
ext4: reflect mb_optimize_scan value in options file
ext4: avoid remove directory when directory is corrupted
ext4: aligned '*' in comments
...
We use jbd_debug() in some places in ext4. It seems a bit strange to use
jbd2 debugging output function for ext4 code. Also these days
ext4_debug() uses dynamic printk so each debug message can be enabled /
disabled on its own so the time when it made some sense to have these
combined (to allow easier common selecting of messages to report) has
passed. Just convert all jbd_debug() uses in ext4 to ext4_debug().
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220608112355.4397-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently ext4_fc_track_template() checks, whether the trace event
path belongs to replay or does sb has ineligible set, if yes it simply
returns. This patch pulls those checks before calling
ext4_fc_track_template() in the callers of ext4_fc_track_template().
[ Add checks to ext4_rename() which calls the __ext4_fc_track_*()
functions directly. -- TYT ]
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3cd025d9c490218a92e6d8fb30b6123e693373e3.1647057583.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
in the follow scenario:
1. jbd start transaction n
2. task A get new handle for transaction n+1
3. task A do some actions and add inode to FC_Q_MAIN fc_q
4. jbd complete transaction n and clear FC_Q_MAIN fc_q
5. task A call fsync
Fast commit will lost the file actions during a full commit.
we should also add updates to staging queue during a full commit.
and in ext4_fc_cleanup(), when reset a inode's fc track range, check
it's i_sync_tid, if it bigger than current transaction tid, do not
rest it, or we will lost the track range.
And EXT4_MF_FC_COMMITTING is not needed anymore, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220117093655.35160-3-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
For the follow scenario:
1. jbd start commit transaction n
2. task A get new handle for transaction n+1
3. task A do some ineligible actions and mark FC_INELIGIBLE
4. jbd complete transaction n and clean FC_INELIGIBLE
5. task A call fsync
In this case fast commit will not fallback to full commit and
transaction n+1 also not handled by jbd.
Make ext4_fc_mark_ineligible() also record transaction tid for
latest ineligible case, when call ext4_fc_cleanup() check
current transaction tid, if small than latest ineligible tid
do not clear the EXT4_MF_FC_INELIGIBLE.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220117093655.35160-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
During fast commit replay procedure, we clear inode blocks bitmap in
ext4_ext_clear_bb(), this may cause ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple() allocate
blocks still in use.
Make ext4_fc_record_regions() also record physical disk regions used by
inodes during replay procedure. Then ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple() can
excludes these blocks in use.
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220110035141.1980-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
For now ,we use ext4_punch_hole() during fast commit replay delete range
procedure. But it will be affected by inode->i_size, which may not
correct during fast commit replay procedure. The following test will
failed.
-create & write foo (len 1000K)
-falloc FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE foo (range 400K - 600K)
-create & fsync bar
-falloc FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE foo (range 300K-500K)
-fsync foo
-crash before a full commit
After the fast_commit reply procedure, the range 400K-500K will not be
removed. Because in this case, when calling ext4_punch_hole() the
inode->i_size is 0, and it just retruns with doing nothing.
Change to use ext4_ext_remove_space() instead of ext4_punch_hole()
to remove blocks of inode directly.
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211223032337.5198-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
