The last user of mmc_power_save|restore_host() APIs is gone, hence let's
drop them. Drop also the corresponding bus_ops callback,
->power_save|restore() as those becomes redundant.
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Eyal Reizer <eyalreizer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
This adds two new HS400 tuning operations:
* hs400_downgrade
* hs400_complete
These supplement the existing HS400 operation:
* prepare_hs400_tuning
This is motivated by a requirement of Renesas SDHI for the following:
1. Disabling SCC before selecting to HS if selection of HS400 has occurred.
This can be done in an implementation of prepare_hs400_tuning_downgrade
2. Updating registers after switching to HS400
This can be done in an implementation of complete_hs400_tuning
If hs400_downgrade or hs400_complete are not implemented then they are not
called. Thus means there should be no affect for existing drivers as none
implemt these ops.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The hard-coded 10ms delay in mmc_power_up came from
commit 79bccc5aef ("mmc: increase power up delay"), which said "The TI
controller on Toshiba Tecra M5 needs more time to power up or the cards
will init incorrectly or not at all." But it's too engineering solution
for a special board but force all platforms to wait for that long time,
especially painful for mmc_power_up for eMMC when booting.
However, it's added since 2009, and we can't tell if other platforms
benefit from it. But in practise, the modern hardware are most likely to
have a stable power supply with 1ms after setting it for no matter PMIC
or discrete power. And more importnatly, most regulators implement the
callback of ->set_voltage_time_sel() for regulator core to wait for
specific period of time for the power supply to be stable, which means
once regulator_set_voltage_* return, the power should reach the the
minimum voltage that works for initialization. Of course, if there
are some other ways for host to power the card, we should allow them
to argue a suitable delay as well.
With this patch, we could assign the delay from firmware, or we could
assigne it via ->set_ios() callback from host drivers.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The SDHCI controller in a SoC might support HS200/HS400 (indicated
using mmc-hs200-1_8v/mmc-hs400-1_8v dt property), but if the board is
modeled such that the IO lines are not connected to 1.8v then
HS200/HS400 cannot be supported. Disable HS200/HS400 if the board
does not have 1.8v connected to the IO lines. Also Disable DDR/UHS in 1.8v
if the IO lines are not connected to 1.8v.
Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Some SD host controllers cannot handle extended use of 3.3V signaling.
To accommodate these controllers, add a capability that requires us to
negotiate the voltage down from 3.3V during card initialization.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Roeschley <kyle.roeschley@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: Jennifer Dahm <jennifer.dahm@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
For blk-mq, add support for completing requests directly in the ->done
callback. That means that error handling and urgent background operations
must be handled by recovery_work in that case.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Until mmc has blk-mq support fully implemented and tested, add a parameter
use_blk_mq, set to true if config option MMC_MQ_DEFAULT is selected, which
it is by default.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Parse the new binding and store it in the host struct after doing some
sanity checks. The code is designed to support fixed SD driver type if
we ever need that.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Currently the host can be claimed by a task. Change this so that the host
can be claimed by a context that may or may not be a task. This provides
for the host to be claimed by a block driver queue to support blk-mq, while
maintaining compatibility with the existing use of mmc_claim_host().
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
In may, Steven sent a patch deleting the bounce buffer handling
and the CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE option.
I chose the less invasive path of making it a runtime config
option, and we merged that successfully for kernel v4.12.
The code is however just standing in the way and taking up
space for seemingly no gain on any systems in wide use today.
Pierre says the code was there to improve speed on TI SDHCI
controllers on certain HP laptops and possibly some Ricoh
controllers as well. Early SDHCI controllers lacked the
scatter-gather feature, which made software bounce buffers
a significant speed boost.
We are clearly talking about the list of SDHCI PCI-based
MMC/SD card readers found in the pci_ids[] list in
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c.
The TI SDHCI derivative is not supported by the upstream
kernel. This leaves the Ricoh.
What we can however notice is that the x86 defconfigs in the
kernel did not enable CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE option, which
means that any such laptop would have to have a custom
configured kernel to actually take advantage of this
bounce buffer speed-up. It simply seems like there was
a speed optimization for the Ricoh controllers that noone
was using. (I have not checked the distro defconfigs but
I am pretty sure the situation is the same there.)
Bounce buffers increased performance on the OMAP HSMMC
at one point, and was part of the original submission in
commit a45c6cb816 ("[ARM] 5369/1: omap mmc: Add new
omap hsmmc controller for 2430 and 34xx, v3")
This optimization was removed in
commit 0ccd76d4c2 ("omap_hsmmc: Implement scatter-gather
emulation")
which found that scatter-gather emulation provided even
better performance.
The same was introduced for SDHCI in
commit 2134a922c6 ("sdhci: scatter-gather (ADMA) support")
I am pretty positively convinced that software
scatter-gather emulation will do for any host controller what
the bounce buffers were doing. Essentially, the bounce buffer
was a reimplementation of software scatter-gather-emulation in
the MMC subsystem, and it should be done away with.
Cc: Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>
Cc: Juha Yrjola <juha.yrjola@solidboot.com>
Cc: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@cavium.com>
Cc: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@cavium.com>
Suggested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The intention of this check was to prevent the conflict between
hotplug and removing driver for whatever reason. Currently it
doesn't improve anything and the following rescan process could
still saftly perform the scan flow. So these code seems pointless
now and let's remove them.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Add host capability MMC_CAP_CD_WAKE to enable irq wake on the card detect
irq.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The MMC_CAP2_HC_ERASE_SZ is used only by a few mmc host drivers. Its intent
is to enable eMMC's high-capacity erase size, as to improve the behaviour
of the erase operations.
We should strive to avoid software configuration options that aren't
necessary, but instead deploy common behaviours. For these reasons, let's
remove the capability bit for MMC_CAP2_HC_ERASE_SZ and make it the default
behaviour.
Note that this change doesn't affect eMMCs supporting trim/discard, because
these commands operates on sectors and takes precedence over erase
commands.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
This option is activated by all multiplatform configs and what
not so we almost always have it turned on, and the memory it
saves is negligible, even more so moving forward. The actual
bounce buffer only gets allocated only when used, the only
thing the ifdefs are saving is a little bit of code.
It is highly improper to have this as a Kconfig option that
get turned on by Kconfig, make this a pure runtime-thing and
let the host decide whether we use bounce buffers. We add a
new property "disable_bounce" to the host struct.
Notice that mmc_queue_calc_bouncesz() already disables the
bounce buffers if host->max_segs != 1, so any arch that has a
maximum number of segments higher than 1 will have bounce
buffers disabled.
The option CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_BOUNCE is default y so the
majority of platforms in the kernel already have it on, and
it then gets turned off at runtime since most of these have
a host->max_segs > 1. The few exceptions that have
host->max_segs == 1 and still turn off the bounce buffering
are those that disable it in their defconfig.
Those are the following:
arch/arm/configs/colibri_pxa300_defconfig
arch/arm/configs/zeus_defconfig
- Uses MMC_PXA, drivers/mmc/host/pxamci.c
- Sets host->max_segs = NR_SG, which is 1
- This needs its bounce buffer deactivated so we set
host->disable_bounce to true in the host driver
arch/arm/configs/davinci_all_defconfig
- Uses MMC_DAVINCI, drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
- This driver sets host->max_segs to MAX_NR_SG, which is 16
- That means this driver anyways disabled bounce buffers
- No special action needed for this platform
arch/arm/configs/lpc32xx_defconfig
arch/arm/configs/nhk8815_defconfig
arch/arm/configs/u300_defconfig
- Uses MMC_ARMMMCI, drivers/mmc/host/mmci.[c|h]
- This driver by default sets host->max_segs to NR_SG,
which is 128, unless a DMA engine is used, and in that case
the number of segments are also > 1
- That means this driver already disables bounce buffers
- No special action needed for these platforms
arch/arm/configs/sama5_defconfig
- Uses MMC_SDHCI, MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM, MMC_SDHCI_OF_AT91, MMC_ATMELMCI
- Uses drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
- Normally sets host->max_segs to SDHCI_MAX_SEGS which is 128 and
thus disables bounce buffers
- Sets host->max_segs to 1 if SDHCI_USE_SDMA is set
- SDHCI_USE_SDMA is only set by SDHCI on PCI adapers
- That means that for this platform bounce buffers are already
disabled at runtime
- No special action needed for this platform
arch/blackfin/configs/CM-BF533_defconfig
arch/blackfin/configs/CM-BF537E_defconfig
- Uses MMC_SPI (a simple MMC card connected on SPI pins)
- Uses drivers/mmc/host/mmc_spi.c
- Sets host->max_segs to MMC_SPI_BLOCKSATONCE which is 128
- That means this platform already disables bounce buffers at
runtime
- No special action needed for these platforms
arch/mips/configs/cavium_octeon_defconfig
- Uses MMC_CAVIUM_OCTEON, drivers/mmc/host/cavium.c
- Sets host->max_segs to 16 or 1
- Setting host->disable_bounce to be sure for the 1 case
arch/mips/configs/qi_lb60_defconfig
- Uses MMC_JZ4740, drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c
- This sets host->max_segs to 128 so bounce buffers are
already runtime disabled
- No action needed for this platform
It would be interesting to come up with a list of the platforms
that actually end up using bounce buffers. I have not been
able to infer such a list, but it occurs when
host->max_segs == 1 and the bounce buffering is not explicitly
disabled.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
For hosts not supporting MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD but MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ,
the SDIO IRQs are processed from a dedicated kernel thread. For these
cases, the host calls mmc_signal_sdio_irq() from its ISR to signal a new
SDIO IRQ.
Signaling an SDIO IRQ makes the host's ->enable_sdio_irq() callback to be
invoked to temporary disable the IRQs, before the kernel thread is woken up
to process it. When processing of the IRQs are completed, they are
re-enabled by the kernel thread, again via invoking the host's
->enable_sdio_irq().
The observation from this, is that the execution path is being unnecessary
complex, as the host driver already knows that it needs to temporary
disable the IRQs before signaling a new one. Moreover, replacing the kernel
thread with a work/workqueue would not only greatly simplify the code, but
also make it more robust.
To address the above problems, let's continue to build upon the support for
MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD, as it already implements SDIO IRQs to be
processed without using the clumsy kernel thread and without the ping-pong
calls of the host's ->enable_sdio_irq() callback for each processed IRQ.
Therefore, let's add new API sdio_signal_irq(), which enables hosts to
signal/process SDIO IRQs by using a work/workqueue, rather than using the
kernel thread.
Add also a new host callback ->ack_sdio_irq(), which the work invokes when
the SDIO IRQs have been processed. This informs the host about when it
shall re-enable the SDIO IRQs. Potentially, we could re-use the existing
->enable_sdio_irq() callback instead of adding a new one, however it has
turned out that it's more convenient for hosts to get this information via
a separate callback.
Hosts that wants to use this new method to signal/process SDIO IRQs, must
enable MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD and implement the ->ack_sdio_irq()
callback.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
According the JEDEC specification an eMMC card supporting 1.8V vccq in DDR
mode should also be capable of 3.3V. However, it's been reported that some
mmc hosts supports 3.3V, but not 1.8V.
Currently the mmc core implements an error handling when the host fails to
set 1.8V for vccq, by falling back to 3.3V. Unfortunate, this seems to be
insufficient for some mmc hosts. To enable these to use eMMC DDR mode let's
invent a new mmc cap, MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR, which tells whether they support
the eMMC 3.3V DDR mode.
In case MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR is set, but not MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR, let's change to
remain on the 3.3V, as it's the default voltage level for vccq, set by the
earlier power up sequence.
As this change introduces MMC_CAP_3_3V_DDR, let's take the opportunity to
do some re-formatting of the related defines in the header file.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Tested-by: Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com>
Tested-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
A significant amount of functions are available through the public mmc
host.h header file. Let's slim down this public mmc interface, as to
prevent users from abusing it, by moving some of the functions to private
mmc host.h header file.
This change concentrates on moving the functions into private mmc headers,
following changes may continue with additional clean-ups.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Ideally the public mmc header file, core.h, shouldn't contain interfaces
particularly intended to be used by host drivers. Instead those should
remain in the host.h header file. Therefore, let's move a couple functions
from core.h to host.h.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
This is the first step in cleaning up the public mmc header files. In this
change we makes sure each header file builds standalone, as that helps to
resolve dependencies.
While changing this, it also seems reasonable to stop including other
headers from inside a header itself which it don't depend upon.
Additionally, in some cases such dependencies are better resolved by
forward declaring the needed struct.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
