There are no drivers left providing the legacy callbacks. So drop
support for these.
If this commit breaks your out-of-tree pwm driver, look at e.g. commit
ec00cd5e63 ("pwm: renesas-tpu: Implement .apply() callback") for an
example of the needed conversion for your driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
At least some implementations sleep. So mark pwm_apply_state() with a
might_sleep() to make callers aware. In the worst case this uncovers a
valid atomic user, then we revert this patch and at least gained some more
knowledge and then can work on a concept similar to
gpio_get_value/gpio_get_value_cansleep.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
The normal implementations of these functions make use of mutexes. To
make it obvious that these functions might sleep also add annotations to
the dummy implementations in the !CONFIG_PWM case.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Since some time pwmchip_remove() always returns 0 so the return value
isn't usefull. Now that all callers are converted to ignore its value
the function can be changed to return void.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
If usage_power is set, the PWM driver is only required to maintain
the power output but has more freedom regarding signal form.
If supported, the signal can be optimized, for example to
improve EMI by phase shifting individual channels.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Given that lowlevel drivers usually cannot implement exactly what a
consumer requests with pwm_apply_state() there is some rounding
involved.
pwm_get_state() returns the setting that was requested most recently by
the consumer (opposed to what was actually implemented in hardware in
reply to the last request). Clarify this in the function kerneldoc.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
pwmchip_add() only calls pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and nothing else. All
other users of pwmchip_add_with_polarity() are gone. So drop
pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and move the code instead to pwmchip_add().
The initial assignment to pwm->state.polarity is dropped. In every correct
usage of the PWM API this value is overwritten later anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This is only defined with CONFIG_PWM unset and was introduced together
with pwmchip_add_with_polarity() (which is only defined with CONFIG_PWM
enabled). I guess the series that introduced pwmchip_add_with_polarity()
had a different concept in earlier revisions and the !CONFIG_PWM part
was just not updated accordingly.
Given that there is no implementation for pwmchip_add_with_polarity()
without CONFIG_PWM, just drop pwmchip_add_inversed() instead of renaming
it to pwmchip_add_with_polarity().
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Because period and duty cycle are defined as ints with units of
nanoseconds, the maximum time duration that can be set is limited to
~2.147 seconds. Change their definitions to u64 in the structs of the
PWM framework so that higher durations may be set.
Also use the right format specifiers in debug prints in both core.c,
pwm-stm32-lp.c as well as video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
There are some expectations which the callbacks provided by lowlevel
drivers should fulfill. Implement checks that help driver authors to get
these semantics right. As these have some overhead the checks can be
disabled using a Kconfig setting.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
It is surprising for a PWM consumer when the variable holding the
requested state is modified by pwm_apply_state(). Consider for example a
driver doing:
#define PERIOD 5000000
#define DUTY_LITTLE 10
...
struct pwm_state state = {
.period = PERIOD,
.duty_cycle = DUTY_LITTLE,
.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL,
.enabled = true,
};
pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state);
...
state.duty_cycle = PERIOD / 2;
pwm_apply_state(mypwm, &state);
For sure the second call to pwm_apply_state() should still have
state.period = PERIOD and not something the hardware driver chose for a
reason that doesn't necessarily apply to the second call.
So declare the state argument as a pointer to a const type and adapt all
drivers' .apply callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
In analogy to referencing a GPIO using the "gpios" property from ACPI,
support referencing a PWM using the "pwms" property.
ACPI entries must look like
Package () {"pwms", Package ()
{ <PWM device reference>, <PWM index>, <PWM period> [, <PWM flags>]}}
In contrast to the DT implementation, only _one_ PWM entry in the "pwms"
property is supported. As a consequence "pwm-names"-property and
con_id lookup aren't supported.
Support for ACPI is added via the firmware-node framework which is an
abstraction layer on top of ACPI/DT. To keep this patch clean, DT and
ACPI paths are kept separate. The firmware-node framework could be used
to unify both paths in a future patch.
To support leds-pwm driver, an additional method devm_fwnode_pwm_get()
which supports both ACPI and DT configuration is exported.
Signed-off-by: Nikolaus Voss <nikolaus.voss@loewensteinmedical.de>
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: fix build failures for !ACPI]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Add a device link between the PWM consumer and the PWM provider. This
enforces the PWM user to get suspended before the PWM provider. It
allows proper synchronization of suspend/resume sequences: the PWM user
is responsible for properly stopping PWM, before the provider gets
suspended: see [1]. Add the device link in:
- of_pwm_get()
- pwm_get()
- devm_*pwm_get() variants
as it requires a reference to the device for the PWM consumer.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/5/770
Suggested-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
In pwm_ops there are a few callbacks that are not supposed to be used by
new drivers. Group them at the end of the structure and add a comment.
Similarily for struct pwm_chip group the members that drivers shouldn't
care about at the end and mark them as internal with another comment.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This callback was introduced in commit 62099abf67 ("pwm: Add debugfs
interface") in 2012 and up to now there is not a single user. So drop
this unused code.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: remove kerneldoc for ->dbg_show()]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
