You've already forked linux-packaging-mono
							
							
		
			
				
	
	
		
			59 lines
		
	
	
		
			1.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			LLVM
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			59 lines
		
	
	
		
			1.9 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			LLVM
		
	
	
	
	
	
| ; RUN: llc -march=avr -print-after=expand-isel-pseudos -cgp-freq-ratio-to-skip-merge=10 < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; Because `switch` seems to trigger Machine Basic Blocks to be ordered
 | |
| ; in a different order than they were constructed, this exposes an
 | |
| ; error in the `expand-isel-pseudos` pass. Specifically, it thought we
 | |
| ; could always fallthrough to a newly-constructed MBB. However,
 | |
| ; there's no guarantee that either of the constructed MBBs need to
 | |
| ; occur immediately after the currently-focused one!
 | |
| ;
 | |
| ; This issue manifests in a CFG that looks something like this:
 | |
| ;
 | |
| ; %bb.2: derived from LLVM BB %finish
 | |
| ;     Predecessors according to CFG: %bb.0 %bb.1
 | |
| ;         %0 = PHI %3, <%bb.0>, %5, <%bb.1>
 | |
| ;         %7 = LDIRdK 2
 | |
| ;         %8 = LDIRdK 1
 | |
| ;         CPRdRr %2, %0, implicit-def %SREG
 | |
| ;         BREQk <%bb.6>, implicit %SREG
 | |
| ;     Successors according to CFG: %bb.5(?%) %bb.6(?%)
 | |
| ;
 | |
| ; The code assumes it the fallthrough block after this is %bb.5, but
 | |
| ; it's actually %bb.3! To be proper, there should be an unconditional
 | |
| ; jump tying this block to %bb.5.
 | |
| 
 | |
| define i8 @select_must_add_unconditional_jump(i8 %arg0, i8 %arg1) unnamed_addr {
 | |
| entry-block:
 | |
|   switch i8 %arg0, label %dead [
 | |
|     i8 0, label %zero
 | |
|     i8 1, label %one
 | |
|   ]
 | |
| 
 | |
| zero:
 | |
|   br label %finish
 | |
| 
 | |
| one:
 | |
|   br label %finish
 | |
| 
 | |
| finish:
 | |
|   %predicate = phi i8 [ 50, %zero ], [ 100, %one ]
 | |
|   %is_eq = icmp eq i8 %arg1, %predicate
 | |
|   %result = select i1 %is_eq, i8 1, i8 2
 | |
|   ret i8 %result
 | |
| 
 | |
| dead:
 | |
|   ret i8 0
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; This check may be a bit brittle, but the important thing is that the
 | |
| ; basic block containing `select` needs to contain explicit jumps to
 | |
| ; both successors.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ; CHECK: %bb.2: derived from LLVM BB %finish
 | |
| ; CHECK: BREQk [[BRANCHED:%bb.[0-9]+]]
 | |
| ; CHECK: RJMPk [[DIRECT:%bb.[0-9]+]]
 | |
| ; CHECK: Successors according to CFG
 | |
| ; CHECK-SAME-DAG: {{.*}}[[BRANCHED]]
 | |
| ; CHECK-SAME-DAG: {{.*}}[[DIRECT]]
 | |
| ; CHECK: %bb.3: derived from LLVM BB
 |