a575963da9
Former-commit-id: da6be194a6b1221998fc28233f2503bd61dd9d14
26 lines
1.5 KiB
XML
26 lines
1.5 KiB
XML
<?xml version="1.0"?>
|
|
<clause number="17.4.2.2" title="Versioning of constants and static readonly fields">
|
|
<paragraph>Constants and readonly fields have different binary versioning semantics. When an expression references a constant, the value of the constant is obtained at compile-time, but when an expression references a readonly field, the value of the field is not obtained until run-time. <example>[Example: Consider an application that consists of two separate programs: <code_example><![CDATA[
|
|
using System;
|
|
namespace Program1
|
|
{
|
|
public class Utils
|
|
{
|
|
public static readonly int X = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
namespace Program2
|
|
{
|
|
class Test
|
|
{
|
|
static void Main() {
|
|
Console.WriteLine(Program1.Utils.X);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
]]></code_example></example></paragraph>
|
|
<paragraph>
|
|
<example>The Program1 and Program2 namespaces denote two programs that are compiled separately. Because Program1.Utils.X is declared as a static readonly field, the value output by the Console.WriteLine statement is not known at compile-time, but rather is obtained at run-time. Thus, if the value of X is changed and Program1 is recompiled, the Console.WriteLine statement will output the new value even if Program2 isn't recompiled. However, had X been a constant, the value of X would have been obtained at the time Program2 was compiled, and would remain unaffected by changes in Program1 until Program2 is recompiled. end example]</example>
|
|
</paragraph>
|
|
</clause>
|