You've already forked linux-packaging-mono
Imported Upstream version 5.10.0.47
Former-commit-id: d0813289fa2d35e1f8ed77530acb4fb1df441bc0
This commit is contained in:
parent
88ff76fe28
commit
e46a49ecf1
73
external/linker/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
vendored
Normal file
73
external/linker/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
|
||||
Guidelines
|
||||
==========
|
||||
|
||||
When contributing to the Mono project, please follow the [Mono Coding
|
||||
Guidelines][1]. We have been using a coding style for many years,
|
||||
please make your patches conform to these guidelines.
|
||||
|
||||
[1]: http://www.mono-project.com/community/contributing/coding-guidelines/
|
||||
|
||||
Etiquette
|
||||
=========
|
||||
|
||||
In general, we do not accept patches that merely shuffle code around,
|
||||
split classes in multiple files, reindent the code or are the result
|
||||
of running a refactoring tool on the source code. This is done for
|
||||
three reasons: (a) we have our own coding guidelines; (b) Some modules
|
||||
are imported from upstream sources and we want to respect their coding
|
||||
guidelines and (c) it destroys valuable history that is often used to
|
||||
investigate bugs, regressions and problems.
|
||||
|
||||
License
|
||||
=======
|
||||
|
||||
The Mono runtime, compilers, and tools and most of the class libraries
|
||||
are licensed under the MIT license. But include some bits of code
|
||||
licensed under different licenses. The exact list is [available here] (https://github.com/mono/mono/blob/master/LICENSE).
|
||||
|
||||
Different parts of Mono use different licenses. The actual details of
|
||||
which licenses are used for which parts are detailed on the LICENSE
|
||||
file in this directory.
|
||||
|
||||
CLA
|
||||
=======
|
||||
|
||||
Contributions are now taken under the [.NET Foundation CLA] (https://cla2.dotnetfoundation.org/).
|
||||
|
||||
Testing
|
||||
=======
|
||||
|
||||
Pull requests go through testing on our [Jenkins server][2]. We will
|
||||
usually only merge a pull request if it causes no regressions in a
|
||||
test run there.
|
||||
|
||||
When you submit a pull request, one of two things happens:
|
||||
|
||||
* If you are a new contributor, Jenkins will ask for permissions (on
|
||||
the pull request) to test it. A maintainer will reply to approve
|
||||
the test run if they find the patch appropriate. After you have
|
||||
submitted a few patches, a maintainer will whitelist you so that
|
||||
all of your future pull requests are tested automatically.
|
||||
* If you are a well-known, whitelisted contributor, Jenkins will go
|
||||
ahead and test your pull request as soon as a test machine is
|
||||
available.
|
||||
|
||||
When your pull request has been built, Jenkins will update the build
|
||||
status of your pull request. If it succeeded and we like the changes,
|
||||
a maintainer will likely merge it. Otherwise, you can amend your pull
|
||||
request to fix build breakage and Jenkins will test it again.
|
||||
|
||||
[2]: http://jenkins.mono-project.com/
|
||||
|
||||
# Inactivity
|
||||
|
||||
Occasionally, a pull request sits for several months without any
|
||||
response from the author. This isn't necessarily an issue, but we may
|
||||
sometimes decide to close pull requests that have not seen any
|
||||
progress for a long time. This is in interest of keeping the pull
|
||||
request list clean so that other pull requests don't get lost in the
|
||||
clutter.
|
||||
|
||||
If we do close your pull request due to inactivity, you're more than
|
||||
welcome to submit it anew after you address any comments or issues that
|
||||
were brought up on the original pull request.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user