You've already forked linux-packaging-mono
Imported Upstream version 5.18.0.167
Former-commit-id: 289509151e0fee68a1b591a20c9f109c3c789d3a
This commit is contained in:
parent
e19d552987
commit
b084638f15
@ -1,108 +0,0 @@
|
||||
; RUN: opt -early-cse -S < %s | FileCheck %s
|
||||
; RUN: opt -basicaa -early-cse-memssa -S < %s | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
; Can we CSE a known condition to a constant?
|
||||
define i1 @test(i8* %p) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @test
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
%cnd1 = icmp eq i8* %p, null
|
||||
br i1 %cnd1, label %taken, label %untaken
|
||||
|
||||
taken:
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: taken:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
|
||||
%cnd2 = icmp eq i8* %p, null
|
||||
ret i1 %cnd2
|
||||
|
||||
untaken:
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: untaken:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 false
|
||||
%cnd3 = icmp eq i8* %p, null
|
||||
ret i1 %cnd3
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; We can CSE the condition, but we *don't* know it's value after the merge
|
||||
define i1 @test_neg1(i8* %p) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_neg1
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
%cnd1 = icmp eq i8* %p, null
|
||||
br i1 %cnd1, label %taken, label %untaken
|
||||
|
||||
taken:
|
||||
br label %merge
|
||||
|
||||
untaken:
|
||||
br label %merge
|
||||
|
||||
merge:
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: merge:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 %cnd1
|
||||
%cnd3 = icmp eq i8* %p, null
|
||||
ret i1 %cnd3
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; Check specifically for a case where we have a unique predecessor, but
|
||||
; not a single predecessor. We can not know the value of the condition here.
|
||||
define i1 @test_neg2(i8* %p) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_neg2
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
%cnd1 = icmp eq i8* %p, null
|
||||
br i1 %cnd1, label %merge, label %merge
|
||||
|
||||
merge:
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: merge:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 %cnd1
|
||||
%cnd3 = icmp eq i8* %p, null
|
||||
ret i1 %cnd3
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; Replace a use rather than CSE
|
||||
define i1 @test2(i8* %p) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @test2
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
%cnd = icmp eq i8* %p, null
|
||||
br i1 %cnd, label %taken, label %untaken
|
||||
|
||||
taken:
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: taken:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true
|
||||
ret i1 %cnd
|
||||
|
||||
untaken:
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: untaken:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 false
|
||||
ret i1 %cnd
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; Not legal to replace use given it's not dominated by edge
|
||||
define i1 @test2_neg1(i8* %p) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @test2_neg1
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
%cnd1 = icmp eq i8* %p, null
|
||||
br i1 %cnd1, label %taken, label %untaken
|
||||
|
||||
taken:
|
||||
br label %merge
|
||||
|
||||
untaken:
|
||||
br label %merge
|
||||
|
||||
merge:
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: merge:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 %cnd1
|
||||
ret i1 %cnd1
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; Another single predecessor test, but for dominated use
|
||||
define i1 @test2_neg2(i8* %p) {
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @test2_neg2
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
%cnd1 = icmp eq i8* %p, null
|
||||
br i1 %cnd1, label %merge, label %merge
|
||||
|
||||
merge:
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: merge:
|
||||
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 %cnd1
|
||||
ret i1 %cnd1
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user