You've already forked linux-packaging-mono
Imported Upstream version 5.18.0.167
Former-commit-id: 289509151e0fee68a1b591a20c9f109c3c789d3a
This commit is contained in:
parent
e19d552987
commit
b084638f15
@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
|
||||
; RUN: llc -march=avr -print-after=expand-isel-pseudos -cgp-freq-ratio-to-skip-merge=10 < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
; Because `switch` seems to trigger Machine Basic Blocks to be ordered
|
||||
; in a different order than they were constructed, this exposes an
|
||||
; error in the `expand-isel-pseudos` pass. Specifically, it thought we
|
||||
; could always fallthrough to a newly-constructed MBB. However,
|
||||
; there's no guarantee that either of the constructed MBBs need to
|
||||
; occur immediately after the currently-focused one!
|
||||
;
|
||||
; This issue manifests in a CFG that looks something like this:
|
||||
;
|
||||
; %bb.2: derived from LLVM BB %finish
|
||||
; Predecessors according to CFG: %bb.0 %bb.1
|
||||
; %0 = PHI %3, <%bb.0>, %5, <%bb.1>
|
||||
; %7 = LDIRdK 2
|
||||
; %8 = LDIRdK 1
|
||||
; CPRdRr %2, %0, implicit-def %SREG
|
||||
; BREQk <%bb.6>, implicit %SREG
|
||||
; Successors according to CFG: %bb.5(?%) %bb.6(?%)
|
||||
;
|
||||
; The code assumes it the fallthrough block after this is %bb.5, but
|
||||
; it's actually %bb.3! To be proper, there should be an unconditional
|
||||
; jump tying this block to %bb.5.
|
||||
|
||||
define i8 @select_must_add_unconditional_jump(i8 %arg0, i8 %arg1) unnamed_addr {
|
||||
entry-block:
|
||||
switch i8 %arg0, label %dead [
|
||||
i8 0, label %zero
|
||||
i8 1, label %one
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
zero:
|
||||
br label %finish
|
||||
|
||||
one:
|
||||
br label %finish
|
||||
|
||||
finish:
|
||||
%predicate = phi i8 [ 50, %zero ], [ 100, %one ]
|
||||
%is_eq = icmp eq i8 %arg1, %predicate
|
||||
%result = select i1 %is_eq, i8 1, i8 2
|
||||
ret i8 %result
|
||||
|
||||
dead:
|
||||
ret i8 0
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
; This check may be a bit brittle, but the important thing is that the
|
||||
; basic block containing `select` needs to contain explicit jumps to
|
||||
; both successors.
|
||||
|
||||
; CHECK: %bb.2: derived from LLVM BB %finish
|
||||
; CHECK: BREQk [[BRANCHED:%bb.[0-9]+]]
|
||||
; CHECK: RJMPk [[DIRECT:%bb.[0-9]+]]
|
||||
; CHECK: Successors according to CFG
|
||||
; CHECK-SAME-DAG: {{.*}}[[BRANCHED]]
|
||||
; CHECK-SAME-DAG: {{.*}}[[DIRECT]]
|
||||
; CHECK: %bb.3: derived from LLVM BB
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user