You've already forked linux-packaging-mono
Imported Upstream version 4.8.0.309
Former-commit-id: 5f9c6ae75f295e057a7d2971f3a6df4656fa8850
This commit is contained in:
parent
ee1447783b
commit
94b2861243
90
external/boringssl/INCORPORATING.md
vendored
Normal file
90
external/boringssl/INCORPORATING.md
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
|
||||
# Incorporating BoringSSL into a project
|
||||
|
||||
**Note**: if your target project is not a Google project then first read the
|
||||
[main README](/README.md) about the purpose of BoringSSL.
|
||||
|
||||
## Directory layout
|
||||
|
||||
Typically projects create a `third_party/boringssl` directory to put
|
||||
BoringSSL-specific files into. The source code of BoringSSL itself goes into
|
||||
`third_party/boringssl/src`, either by copying or as a
|
||||
[submodule](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-submodule).
|
||||
|
||||
It's generally a mistake to put BoringSSL's source code into
|
||||
`third_party/boringssl` directly because pre-built files and custom build files
|
||||
need to go somewhere and merging these with the BoringSSL source code makes
|
||||
updating things more complex.
|
||||
|
||||
## Build support
|
||||
|
||||
BoringSSL is designed to work with many different build systems. Currently,
|
||||
different projects use [GYP](https://gyp.gsrc.io/),
|
||||
[GN](https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/tools/gn/docs/quick_start.md),
|
||||
[Bazel](http://bazel.io/) and [Make](https://www.gnu.org/software/make/) to
|
||||
build BoringSSL, without too much pain.
|
||||
|
||||
The development build system is CMake and the CMake build knows how to
|
||||
automatically generate the intermediate files that BoringSSL needs. However,
|
||||
outside of the CMake environment, these intermediates are generated once and
|
||||
checked into the incorporating project's source repository. This avoids
|
||||
incorporating projects needing to support Perl and Go in their build systems.
|
||||
|
||||
The script [`util/generate_build_files.py`](/util/generate_build_files.py)
|
||||
expects to be run from the `third_party/boringssl` directory and to find the
|
||||
BoringSSL source code in `src/`. You should pass it a single argument: the name
|
||||
of the build system that you're using. If you don't use any of the supported
|
||||
build systems then you should augment `generate_build_files.py` with support
|
||||
for it.
|
||||
|
||||
The script will pregenerate the intermediate files (see
|
||||
[BUILDING.md](/BUILDING.md) for details about which tools will need to be
|
||||
installed) and output helper files for that build system. It doesn't generate a
|
||||
complete build script, just file and test lists, which change often. For
|
||||
example, see the
|
||||
[file](https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/third_party/boringssl/BUILD.generated.gni)
|
||||
and
|
||||
[test](https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/third_party/boringssl/BUILD.generated_tests.gni)
|
||||
lists generated for GN in Chromium.
|
||||
|
||||
Generally one checks in these generated files alongside the hand-written build
|
||||
files. Periodically an engineer updates the BoringSSL revision, regenerates
|
||||
these files and checks in the updated result. As an example, see how this is
|
||||
done [in Chromium](https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/third_party/boringssl/).
|
||||
|
||||
## Defines
|
||||
|
||||
BoringSSL does not present a lot of configurability in order to reduce the
|
||||
number of configurations that need to be tested. But there are a couple of
|
||||
\#defines that you may wish to set:
|
||||
|
||||
`OPENSSL_NO_ASM` prevents the use of assembly code (although it's up to you to
|
||||
ensure that the build system doesn't link it in if you wish to reduce binary
|
||||
size). This will have a significant performance impact but can be useful if you
|
||||
wish to use tools like
|
||||
[AddressSanitizer](http://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html) that
|
||||
interact poorly with assembly code.
|
||||
|
||||
`OPENSSL_SMALL` removes some code that is especially large at some performance
|
||||
cost.
|
||||
|
||||
## Symbols
|
||||
|
||||
You cannot link multiple versions of BoringSSL or OpenSSL into a single binary
|
||||
without dealing with symbol conflicts. If you are statically linking multiple
|
||||
versions together, there's not a lot that can be done because C doesn't have a
|
||||
module system.
|
||||
|
||||
If you are using multiple versions in a single binary, in different shared
|
||||
objects, ensure you build BoringSSL with `-fvisibility=hidden` and do not
|
||||
export any of BoringSSL's symbols. This will prevent any collisions with other
|
||||
verisons that may be included in other shared objects. Note that this requires
|
||||
that all callers of BoringSSL APIs live in the same shared object as BoringSSL.
|
||||
|
||||
If you require that BoringSSL APIs be used across shared object boundaries,
|
||||
continue to build with `-fvisibility=hidden` but define
|
||||
`BORINGSSL_SHARED_LIBRARY` in both BoringSSL and consumers. BoringSSL's own
|
||||
source files (but *not* consumers' source files) must also build with
|
||||
`BORINGSSL_IMPLEMENTATION` defined. This will export BoringSSL's public symbols
|
||||
in the resulting shared object while hiding private symbols. However note that,
|
||||
as with a static link, this precludes dynamically linking with another version
|
||||
of BoringSSL or OpenSSL.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user