mono/linux-packaging-mono
0
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
b04622f4867acae479f8b9019a4cb43a36d220df
linux-packaging-mono/external/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/switch.ll

781 lines
23 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

Imported Upstream version 6.0.0.172 Former-commit-id: f3cc9b82f3e5bd8f0fd3ebc098f789556b44e9cd
2019-04-12 14:10:50 +00:00
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-linux-gnu %s -o - -jump-table-density=40 -switch-peel-threshold=101 -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck %s
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-linux-gnu %s -o - -O0 -jump-table-density=40 -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck --check-prefix=NOOPT %s
declare void @g(i32)
define void @basic(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 3, label %bb0
i32 1, label %bb1
i32 4, label %bb1
i32 5, label %bb2
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
return: ret void
; Lowered as a jump table, both with and without optimization.
; CHECK-LABEL: basic
; CHECK: decl
; CHECK: cmpl $4
; CHECK: ja
; CHECK: jmpq *.LJTI
; NOOPT-LABEL: basic
; NOOPT: decl
; NOOPT: subl $4
; NOOPT: ja
; NOOPT: movq .LJTI
; NOOPT: jmpq
}
; Should never be lowered as a jump table because of the attribute
define void @basic_nojumptable(i32 %x) "no-jump-tables"="true" {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 3, label %bb0
i32 1, label %bb1
i32 4, label %bb1
i32 5, label %bb2
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
return: ret void
; Lowered as a jump table, both with and without optimization.
; CHECK-LABEL: basic_nojumptable
; CHECK-NOT: jmpq *.LJTI
}
; Should be lowered as a jump table because of the attribute
define void @basic_nojumptable_false(i32 %x) "no-jump-tables"="false" {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 3, label %bb0
i32 1, label %bb1
i32 4, label %bb1
i32 5, label %bb2
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
return: ret void
; Lowered as a jump table, both with and without optimization.
; CHECK-LABEL: basic_nojumptable_false
; CHECK: decl
; CHECK: cmpl $4
; CHECK: ja
; CHECK: jmpq *.LJTI
}
define void @simple_ranges(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 0, label %bb0
i32 1, label %bb0
i32 2, label %bb0
i32 3, label %bb0
i32 100, label %bb1
i32 101, label %bb1
i32 102, label %bb1
i32 103, label %bb1
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
return: ret void
; Should be lowered to two range checks.
; CHECK-LABEL: simple_ranges
; CHECK: leal -100
; CHECK: cmpl $4
; CHECK: jb
; CHECK: cmpl $3
; CHECK: ja
; We do this even at -O0, because it's cheap and makes codegen faster.
; NOOPT-LABEL: simple_ranges
; NOOPT: subl $4
; NOOPT: jb
; NOOPT: addl $-100
; NOOPT: subl $4
; NOOPT: jb
}
define void @jt_is_better(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 0, label %bb0
i32 2, label %bb0
i32 4, label %bb0
i32 1, label %bb1
i32 3, label %bb1
i32 5, label %bb1
i32 6, label %bb2
i32 7, label %bb3
i32 8, label %bb4
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
bb3: tail call void @g(i32 3) br label %return
bb4: tail call void @g(i32 4) br label %return
return: ret void
; Cases 0-5 could be lowered with two bit tests,
; but with 6-8, the whole switch is suitable for a jump table.
; CHECK-LABEL: jt_is_better
; CHECK: cmpl $8
; CHECK: ja
; CHECK: jmpq *.LJTI
}
define void @bt_is_better(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 0, label %bb0
i32 3, label %bb0
i32 6, label %bb0
i32 1, label %bb1
i32 4, label %bb1
i32 7, label %bb1
i32 2, label %bb2
i32 5, label %bb2
i32 8, label %bb2
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
return: ret void
; This could be lowered as a jump table, but bit tests is more efficient.
; CHECK-LABEL: bt_is_better
; The bit test on 2,5,8 is unnecessary as all cases cover the rage [0, 8].
; The range check guarantees that cases other than 0,3,6 and 1,4,7 must be
; in 2,5,8.
;
; 73 = 2^0 + 2^3 + 2^6
; CHECK: movl $73
; CHECK: btl
; 146 = 2^1 + 2^4 + 2^7
; CHECK: movl $146
; CHECK: btl
; 292 = 2^2 + 2^5 + 2^8
; CHECK-NOT: movl $292
; CHECK-NOT: btl
}
define void @bt_is_better2(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 0, label %bb0
i32 3, label %bb0
i32 6, label %bb0
i32 1, label %bb1
i32 4, label %bb1
i32 7, label %bb1
i32 2, label %bb2
i32 8, label %bb2
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
return: ret void
; This will also be lowered as bit test, but as the range [0,8] is not fully
; covered (5 missing), the default statement can be jumped to and we end up
; with one more branch.
; CHECK-LABEL: bt_is_better2
;
; 73 = 2^0 + 2^3 + 2^6
; CHECK: movl $73
; CHECK: btl
; 146 = 2^1 + 2^4 + 2^7
; CHECK: movl $146
; CHECK: btl
; 260 = 2^2 + 2^8
; CHECK: movl $260
; CHECK: btl
}
define void @bt_is_better3(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 10, label %bb0
i32 13, label %bb0
i32 16, label %bb0
i32 11, label %bb1
i32 14, label %bb1
i32 17, label %bb1
i32 12, label %bb2
i32 18, label %bb2
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
return: ret void
; We don't have to subtract 10 from the case value to let the range become
; [0, 8], as each value in the range [10, 18] can be represented by bits in a
; word. Then we still need a branch to jump to the default statement for the
; range [0, 10).
; CHECK-LABEL: bt_is_better3
;
; 74752 = 2^10 + 2^13 + 2^16
; CHECK: movl $74752
; CHECK: btl
; 149504 = 2^11 + 2^14 + 2^17
; CHECK: movl $149504
; CHECK: btl
; 266240 = 2^12 + 2^15 + 2^18
; CHECK: movl $266240
; CHECK: btl
}
define void @optimal_pivot1(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 100, label %bb0
i32 200, label %bb1
i32 300, label %bb0
i32 400, label %bb1
i32 500, label %bb0
i32 600, label %bb1
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
return: ret void
; Should pivot around 400 for two subtrees of equal size.
; CHECK-LABEL: optimal_pivot1
; CHECK-NOT: cmpl
; CHECK: cmpl $399
}
define void @optimal_pivot2(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 100, label %bb0 i32 101, label %bb1 i32 102, label %bb2 i32 103, label %bb3
i32 200, label %bb0 i32 201, label %bb1 i32 202, label %bb2 i32 203, label %bb3
i32 300, label %bb0 i32 301, label %bb1 i32 302, label %bb2 i32 303, label %bb3
i32 400, label %bb0 i32 401, label %bb1 i32 402, label %bb2 i32 403, label %bb3
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
bb3: tail call void @g(i32 3) br label %return
return: ret void
; Should pivot around 300 for two subtrees with two jump tables each.
; CHECK-LABEL: optimal_pivot2
; CHECK-NOT: cmpl
; CHECK: cmpl $299
; CHECK: jmpq *.LJTI
; CHECK: jmpq *.LJTI
; CHECK: jmpq *.LJTI
; CHECK: jmpq *.LJTI
}
define void @optimal_jump_table1(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 0, label %bb0
i32 5, label %bb1
i32 6, label %bb2
i32 12, label %bb3
i32 13, label %bb4
i32 15, label %bb5
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
bb3: tail call void @g(i32 3) br label %return
bb4: tail call void @g(i32 4) br label %return
bb5: tail call void @g(i32 5) br label %return
return: ret void
; Splitting in the largest gap (between 6 and 12) would yield suboptimal result.
; Expecting a jump table from 5 to 15.
; CHECK-LABEL: optimal_jump_table1
; CHECK: leal -5
; CHECK: cmpl $10
; CHECK: jmpq *.LJTI
; At -O0, we don't build jump tables for only parts of a switch.
; NOOPT-LABEL: optimal_jump_table1
; NOOPT: testl %edi, %edi
; NOOPT: je
; NOOPT: subl $5, %eax
; NOOPT: je
; NOOPT: subl $6, %eax
; NOOPT: je
; NOOPT: subl $12, %eax
; NOOPT: je
; NOOPT: subl $13, %eax
; NOOPT: je
; NOOPT: subl $15, %eax
; NOOPT: je
}
define void @optimal_jump_table2(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 0, label %bb0
i32 1, label %bb1
i32 2, label %bb2
i32 9, label %bb3
i32 14, label %bb4
i32 15, label %bb5
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
bb3: tail call void @g(i32 3) br label %return
bb4: tail call void @g(i32 4) br label %return
bb5: tail call void @g(i32 5) br label %return
return: ret void
; Partitioning the cases to the minimum number of dense sets is not good enough.
; This can be partitioned as {0,1,2,9},{14,15} or {0,1,2},{9,14,15}. The former
; should be preferred. Expecting a table from 0-9.
; CHECK-LABEL: optimal_jump_table2
; CHECK: cmpl $9
; CHECK: jmpq *.LJTI
}
define void @optimal_jump_table3(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 1, label %bb0
i32 2, label %bb1
i32 3, label %bb2
i32 10, label %bb3
i32 13, label %bb0
i32 14, label %bb1
i32 15, label %bb2
i32 20, label %bb3
i32 25, label %bb4
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
bb3: tail call void @g(i32 3) br label %return
bb4: tail call void @g(i32 4) br label %return
return: ret void
; Splitting to maximize left-right density sum and gap size would split this
; between 3 and 10, and then between 20 and 25. It's better to build a table
; from 1-20.
; CHECK-LABEL: optimal_jump_table3
; CHECK: leal -1
; CHECK: cmpl $19
; CHECK: jmpq *.LJTI
}
%struct.S = type { %struct.S*, i32 }
define void @phi_node_trouble(%struct.S* %s) {
entry:
br label %header
header:
%ptr = phi %struct.S* [ %s, %entry ], [ %next, %loop ]
%bool = icmp eq %struct.S* %ptr, null
br i1 %bool, label %exit, label %loop
loop:
%nextptr = getelementptr inbounds %struct.S, %struct.S* %ptr, i64 0, i32 0
%next = load %struct.S*, %struct.S** %nextptr
%xptr = getelementptr inbounds %struct.S, %struct.S* %next, i64 0, i32 1
%x = load i32, i32* %xptr
switch i32 %x, label %exit [
i32 4, label %header
i32 36, label %exit2
i32 69, label %exit2
i32 25, label %exit2
]
exit:
ret void
exit2:
ret void
; This will be lowered to a comparison with 4 and then bit tests. Make sure
; that the phi node in %header gets a value from the comparison block.
; CHECK-LABEL: phi_node_trouble
; CHECK: movq (%[[REG1:[a-z]+]]), %[[REG1]]
; CHECK: movl 8(%[[REG1]]), %[[REG2:[a-z]+]]
; CHECK: cmpl $4, %[[REG2]]
}
define void @default_only(i32 %x) {
entry:
br label %sw
return:
ret void
sw:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
]
; Branch directly to the default.
; (In optimized builds the switch is removed earlier.)
; NOOPT-LABEL: default_only
; NOOPT: .LBB[[L:[A-Z0-9_]+]]:
; NOOPT-NEXT: retq
; NOOPT: jmp .LBB[[L]]
}
define void @int_max_table_cluster(i8 %x) {
entry:
switch i8 %x, label %return [
i8 0, label %bb0 i8 1, label %bb0 i8 2, label %bb0 i8 3, label %bb0
i8 4, label %bb0 i8 5, label %bb0 i8 6, label %bb0 i8 7, label %bb0
i8 8, label %bb0 i8 9, label %bb0 i8 10, label %bb0 i8 11, label %bb0
i8 12, label %bb0 i8 13, label %bb0 i8 14, label %bb0 i8 15, label %bb0
i8 16, label %bb0 i8 17, label %bb0 i8 18, label %bb0 i8 19, label %bb0
i8 20, label %bb0 i8 21, label %bb0 i8 22, label %bb0 i8 23, label %bb0
i8 24, label %bb0 i8 25, label %bb0 i8 26, label %bb0 i8 27, label %bb0
i8 28, label %bb0 i8 29, label %bb0 i8 30, label %bb0 i8 31, label %bb0
i8 32, label %bb0 i8 33, label %bb0 i8 34, label %bb0 i8 35, label %bb0
i8 36, label %bb0 i8 37, label %bb0 i8 38, label %bb0 i8 39, label %bb0
i8 40, label %bb0 i8 41, label %bb0 i8 42, label %bb0 i8 43, label %bb0
i8 44, label %bb0 i8 45, label %bb0 i8 46, label %bb0 i8 47, label %bb0
i8 48, label %bb0 i8 49, label %bb0 i8 50, label %bb0 i8 51, label %bb0
i8 52, label %bb0 i8 53, label %bb0 i8 54, label %bb0 i8 55, label %bb0
i8 56, label %bb0 i8 57, label %bb0 i8 58, label %bb0 i8 59, label %bb0
i8 60, label %bb0 i8 61, label %bb0 i8 62, label %bb0 i8 63, label %bb0
i8 64, label %bb0 i8 65, label %bb0 i8 66, label %bb0 i8 67, label %bb0
i8 68, label %bb0 i8 69, label %bb0 i8 70, label %bb0 i8 71, label %bb0
i8 72, label %bb0 i8 73, label %bb0 i8 74, label %bb0 i8 75, label %bb0
i8 76, label %bb0 i8 77, label %bb0 i8 78, label %bb0 i8 79, label %bb0
i8 80, label %bb0 i8 81, label %bb0 i8 82, label %bb0 i8 83, label %bb0
i8 84, label %bb0 i8 85, label %bb0 i8 86, label %bb0 i8 87, label %bb0
i8 88, label %bb0 i8 89, label %bb0 i8 90, label %bb0 i8 91, label %bb0
i8 92, label %bb0 i8 93, label %bb0 i8 94, label %bb0 i8 95, label %bb0
i8 96, label %bb0 i8 97, label %bb0 i8 98, label %bb0 i8 99, label %bb0
i8 100, label %bb0 i8 101, label %bb0 i8 102, label %bb0 i8 103, label %bb0
i8 104, label %bb0 i8 105, label %bb0 i8 106, label %bb0 i8 107, label %bb0
i8 108, label %bb0 i8 109, label %bb0 i8 110, label %bb0 i8 111, label %bb0
i8 112, label %bb0 i8 113, label %bb0 i8 114, label %bb0 i8 115, label %bb0
i8 116, label %bb0 i8 117, label %bb0 i8 118, label %bb0 i8 119, label %bb0
i8 120, label %bb0 i8 121, label %bb0 i8 122, label %bb0 i8 123, label %bb0
i8 124, label %bb0 i8 125, label %bb0 i8 126, label %bb0 i8 127, label %bb0
i8 -64, label %bb1 i8 -63, label %bb1 i8 -62, label %bb1 i8 -61, label %bb1
i8 -60, label %bb1 i8 -59, label %bb1 i8 -58, label %bb1 i8 -57, label %bb1
i8 -56, label %bb1 i8 -55, label %bb1 i8 -54, label %bb1 i8 -53, label %bb1
i8 -52, label %bb1 i8 -51, label %bb1 i8 -50, label %bb1 i8 -49, label %bb1
i8 -48, label %bb1 i8 -47, label %bb1 i8 -46, label %bb1 i8 -45, label %bb1
i8 -44, label %bb1 i8 -43, label %bb1 i8 -42, label %bb1 i8 -41, label %bb1
i8 -40, label %bb1 i8 -39, label %bb1 i8 -38, label %bb1 i8 -37, label %bb1
i8 -36, label %bb1 i8 -35, label %bb1 i8 -34, label %bb1 i8 -33, label %bb1
i8 -32, label %bb2 i8 -31, label %bb2 i8 -30, label %bb2 i8 -29, label %bb2
i8 -28, label %bb2 i8 -27, label %bb2 i8 -26, label %bb2 i8 -25, label %bb2
i8 -24, label %bb2 i8 -23, label %bb2 i8 -22, label %bb2 i8 -21, label %bb2
i8 -20, label %bb2 i8 -19, label %bb2 i8 -18, label %bb2 i8 -17, label %bb2
i8 -16, label %bb3 i8 -15, label %bb3 i8 -14, label %bb3 i8 -13, label %bb3
i8 -12, label %bb3 i8 -11, label %bb3 i8 -10, label %bb3 i8 -9, label %bb3
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb3: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
return: ret void
; Don't infloop on jump tables where the upper bound is the max value of the
; input type (in this case 127).
; CHECK-LABEL: int_max_table_cluster
; CHECK: jmpq *.LJTI
}
define void @bt_order_by_weight(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 0, label %bb0
i32 3, label %bb0
i32 6, label %bb0
i32 1, label %bb1
i32 4, label %bb1
i32 7, label %bb1
i32 2, label %bb2
i32 5, label %bb2
i32 8, label %bb2
i32 9, label %bb2
], !prof !1
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
return: ret void
; Cases 1,4,7 have a very large branch weight (which shouldn't overflow), so
; their bit test should come first. 0,3,6 and 2,5,8,9 both have a weight of 12,
; but the latter set has more cases, so should be tested for earlier.
; The bit test on 0,3,6 is unnecessary as all cases cover the rage [0, 9].
; The range check guarantees that cases other than 1,4,7 and 2,5,8,9 must be
; in 0,3,6.
; CHECK-LABEL: bt_order_by_weight
; 146 = 2^1 + 2^4 + 2^7
; CHECK: movl $146
; CHECK: btl
; 292 = 2^2 + 2^5 + 2^8 + 2^9
; CHECK: movl $804
; CHECK: btl
; 73 = 2^0 + 2^3 + 2^6
; CHECK-NOT: movl $73
; CHECK-NOT: btl
}
!1 = !{!"branch_weights",
; Default:
i32 1,
; Cases 0,3,6:
i32 4, i32 4, i32 4,
; Cases 1,4,7:
i32 4294967295, i32 2, i32 4294967295,
; Cases 2,5,8,9:
i32 3, i32 3, i32 3, i32 3}
define void @order_by_weight_and_fallthrough(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 100, label %bb1
i32 200, label %bb0
i32 300, label %bb0
], !prof !2
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
return: ret void
; Case 200 has the highest weight and should come first. 100 and 300 have the
; same weight, but 300 goes to the 'next' block, so should be last.
; CHECK-LABEL: order_by_weight_and_fallthrough
; CHECK: cmpl $200
; CHECK: cmpl $100
; CHECK: cmpl $300
}
!2 = !{!"branch_weights",
; Default:
i32 1,
; Case 100:
i32 10,
; Case 200:
i32 1000,
; Case 300:
i32 10}
define void @zero_weight_tree(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 0, label %bb0
i32 10, label %bb1
i32 20, label %bb2
i32 30, label %bb3
i32 40, label %bb4
i32 50, label %bb5
], !prof !3
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
bb3: tail call void @g(i32 3) br label %return
bb4: tail call void @g(i32 4) br label %return
bb5: tail call void @g(i32 5) br label %return
return: ret void
; Make sure to pick a pivot in the middle also with zero-weight cases.
; CHECK-LABEL: zero_weight_tree
; CHECK-NOT: cmpl
; CHECK: cmpl $29
}
!3 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 1, i32 10, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 10}
define void @left_leaning_weight_balanced_tree(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 0, label %bb0
i32 10, label %bb1
i32 20, label %bb2
i32 30, label %bb3
i32 40, label %bb4
i32 50, label %bb5
i32 60, label %bb6
i32 70, label %bb6
], !prof !4
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
bb3: tail call void @g(i32 3) br label %return
bb4: tail call void @g(i32 4) br label %return
bb5: tail call void @g(i32 5) br label %return
bb6: tail call void @g(i32 6) br label %return
bb7: tail call void @g(i32 7) br label %return
return: ret void
; Without branch probabilities, the pivot would be 40, since that would yield
; equal-sized sub-trees. When taking weights into account, case 70 becomes the
; pivot. Since there is room for 3 cases in a leaf, cases 50 and 60 are also
; included in the right-hand side because that doesn't reduce their rank.
; CHECK-LABEL: left_leaning_weight_balanced_tree
; CHECK-NOT: cmpl
; CHECK: cmpl $49
}
!4 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 1, i32 10, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1000}
define void @left_leaning_weight_balanced_tree2(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 0, label %bb0
i32 10, label %bb1
i32 20, label %bb2
i32 30, label %bb3
i32 40, label %bb4
i32 50, label %bb5
i32 60, label %bb6
i32 70, label %bb6
], !prof !5
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
bb3: tail call void @g(i32 3) br label %return
bb4: tail call void @g(i32 4) br label %return
bb5: tail call void @g(i32 5) br label %return
bb6: tail call void @g(i32 6) br label %return
bb7: tail call void @g(i32 7) br label %return
return: ret void
; Same as the previous test, except case 50 has higher rank to the left than it
; would have on the right. Case 60 would have the same rank on both sides, so is
; moved into the leaf.
; CHECK-LABEL: left_leaning_weight_balanced_tree2
; CHECK-NOT: cmpl
; CHECK: cmpl $59
}
!5 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 1, i32 10, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 90, i32 70, i32 1000}
define void @right_leaning_weight_balanced_tree(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
i32 0, label %bb0
i32 10, label %bb1
i32 20, label %bb2
i32 30, label %bb3
i32 40, label %bb4
i32 50, label %bb5
i32 60, label %bb6
i32 70, label %bb6
], !prof !6
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
bb3: tail call void @g(i32 3) br label %return
bb4: tail call void @g(i32 4) br label %return
bb5: tail call void @g(i32 5) br label %return
bb6: tail call void @g(i32 6) br label %return
bb7: tail call void @g(i32 7) br label %return
return: ret void
; Analogous to left_leaning_weight_balanced_tree.
; CHECK-LABEL: right_leaning_weight_balanced_tree
; CHECK-NOT: cmpl
; CHECK: cmpl $19
}
!6 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 1, i32 1000, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 10}
define void @jump_table_affects_balance(i32 %x) {
entry:
switch i32 %x, label %return [
; Jump table:
i32 0, label %bb0
i32 1, label %bb1
i32 2, label %bb2
i32 3, label %bb3
i32 100, label %bb0
i32 200, label %bb1
i32 300, label %bb2
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
bb2: tail call void @g(i32 2) br label %return
bb3: tail call void @g(i32 3) br label %return
return: ret void
; CHECK-LABEL: jump_table_affects_balance
; If the tree were balanced based on number of clusters, {0-3,100} would go on
; the left and {200,300} on the right. However, the jump table weights as much
; as its components, so 100 is selected as the pivot.
; CHECK-NOT: cmpl
; CHECK: cmpl $99
}
define void @pr23738(i4 %x) {
entry:
switch i4 %x, label %bb0 [
i4 0, label %bb1
i4 1, label %bb1
i4 -5, label %bb1
]
bb0: tail call void @g(i32 0) br label %return
bb1: tail call void @g(i32 1) br label %return
return: ret void
; Don't assert due to truncating the bitwidth (64) to i4 when checking
; that the bit-test range fits in a word.
}
define i32 @pr27135(i32 %i) {
entry:
br i1 undef, label %sw, label %end
sw:
switch i32 %i, label %end [
i32 99, label %sw.bb
i32 98, label %sw.bb
i32 101, label %sw.bb
i32 97, label %sw.bb2
i32 96, label %sw.bb2
i32 100, label %sw.bb2
]
sw.bb:
unreachable
sw.bb2:
unreachable
end:
%p = phi i32 [ 1, %sw ], [ 0, %entry ]
ret i32 %p
; CHECK-LABEL: pr27135:
; The switch is lowered with bit tests. Since the case range is contiguous, the
; second bit test is redundant and can be skipped. Check that we don't update
; the phi node with an incoming value from the MBB of the skipped bit test
; (-verify-machine-instrs cathces this).
; CHECK: btl
; CHECK-NOT: btl
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink