When the kernel is booted with a kunit filter (e.g.,
kunit.filter="speed!=slow"), the kunit executor dynamically allocates
copies of the filtered test suites using kmalloc/kmemdup.
During the initial boot execution, kunit_debugfs_create_suite() creates
debugfs files (such as /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/run) and
permanently stores a pointer to the dynamically allocated suite in the
inode's i_private field.
Previously, the executor freed this dynamically allocated suite_set
immediately after executing the boot-time tests. Because the debugfs
nodes were not destroyed, any subsequent interaction with the debugfs
`run` file from userspace triggered a use-after-free (UAF). On systems
with architectural capabilities, like CHERI RISC-V, this resulted in
an immediate fatal hardware exception due to the invalidation of the
capability tags on the reclaimed memory. On other architectures, it
resulted in silent memory corruption.
Fix this UAF by properly coupling the lifetime of the filtered suite
memory allocation to the lifetime of the kunit subsystem and its
associated VFS nodes. Ownership of the boot-time suite_set is now
transferred to a global tracker ('kunit_boot_suites'), and the memory
is cleanly released in kunit_exit() during module teardown.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260507084854.233984-1-florian.schmaus@codasip.com
Fixes: e2219db280 ("kunit: add debugfs /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<suite>/results display")
Signed-off-by: Florian Schmaus <florian.schmaus@codasip.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <david@davidgow.net>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Some of the recent changes to the kunit framework caused the stack usage
for kunit_run_tests() to grow higher than most other kernel functions,
which triggers a warning when CONFIG_FRAME_WARN is set to a relatively
low value:
lib/kunit/test.c: In function 'kunit_run_tests':
lib/kunit/test.c:801:1: error: the frame size of 1312 bytes is larger than 1280 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
Split out the inner loop into a separate function to ensure that each
function remains under the limit, and pass the kunit_result_stats
structures by reference to avoid excessive copies.
Fixed checkpatch warnings at commit time:
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
When running parameterized tests, each test case is initialized with
kunit_init_test(). This function takes the test_case->log as a parameter
but it clears it via string_stream_clear() on each iteration.
This results in only the log from the last parameter being preserved in
the test_case->log and the results from the previous parameters are lost
from the debugfs entry.
Fix this by manually setting the param_test.log to the test_case->log
after it has been initialized. This prevents kunit_init_test() from
clearing the log on each iteration.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251024190101.2091549-1-cmllamas@google.com
Fixes: 4b59300ba4 ("kunit: Add parent kunit for parameterized test context")
Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
KUnit parameterized tests currently support two primary methods f
or getting parameters:
1. Defining custom logic within a generate_params() function.
2. Using the KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM() and KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM_DESC()
macros with a pre-defined static array and passing
the created *_gen_params() to KUNIT_CASE_PARAM().
These methods present limitations when dealing with dynamically
generated parameter arrays, or in scenarios where populating parameters
sequentially via generate_params() is inefficient or overly complex.
This patch addresses these limitations by adding a new `params_array`
field to `struct kunit`, of the type `kunit_params`. The
`struct kunit_params` is designed to store the parameter array itself,
along with essential metadata including the parameter count, parameter
size, and a get_description() function for providing custom descriptions
for individual parameters.
The `params_array` field can be populated by calling the new
kunit_register_params_array() macro from within a param_init() function.
This will register the array as part of the parameterized test context.
The user will then need to pass kunit_array_gen_params() to the
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_WITH_INIT() macro as the generator function, if not
providing their own. kunit_array_gen_params() is a KUnit helper that will
use the registered array to generate parameters.
The arrays passed to KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(,DESC) will also be registered to
the parameterized test context for consistency as well as for higher
availability of the parameter count that will be used for outputting a KTAP
test plan for a parameterized test.
This modification provides greater flexibility to the KUnit framework,
allowing testers to easily register and utilize both dynamic and static
parameter arrays.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250826091341.1427123-5-davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marie Zhussupova <marievic@google.com>
[Only output the test plan if using kunit_array_gen_params --David]
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To enable more complex parameterized testing scenarios, the
generate_params() function needs additional context beyond just
the previously generated parameter. This patch modifies the
generate_params() function signature to include an extra
`struct kunit *test` argument, giving test users access to the
parameterized test context when generating parameters.
The `struct kunit *test` argument was added as the first parameter
to the function signature as it aligns with the convention of other
KUnit functions that accept `struct kunit *test` first. This also
mirrors the "this" or "self" reference found in object-oriented
programming languages.
This patch also modifies xe_pci_live_device_gen_param() in xe_pci.c
and nthreads_gen_params() in kcsan_test.c to reflect this signature
change.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250826091341.1427123-4-davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marie Zhussupova <marievic@google.com>
[Catch some additional gen_params signatures in drm/xe/tests --David]
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add (*param_init) and (*param_exit) function pointers to
`struct kunit_case`. Users will be able to set them via the new
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_WITH_INIT() macro.
param_init/exit will be invoked by kunit_run_tests() once before and once
after the parameterized test, respectively. They will receive the
`struct kunit` that holds the parameterized test context; facilitating
init and exit for shared state.
This patch also sets param_init/exit to None in rust/kernel/kunit.rs.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250826091341.1427123-3-davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marie Zhussupova <marievic@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently, KUnit parameterized tests lack a mechanism to share
resources across parameter runs because the same `struct kunit`
instance is cleaned up and reused for each run.
This patch introduces parameterized test context, enabling test
users to share resources between parameter runs. It also allows
setting up resources that need to be available for all parameter
runs only once, which is helpful in cases where setup is expensive.
To establish a parameterized test context, this patch adds a
parent pointer field to `struct kunit`. This allows resources added
to the parent `struct kunit` to be shared and accessible across all
parameter runs.
In kunit_run_tests(), the default `struct kunit` created is now
designated to act as the parameterized test context whenever a test
is parameterized.
Subsequently, a new `struct kunit` is made for each parameter run, and
its parent pointer is set to the `struct kunit` that holds the
parameterized test context.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250826091341.1427123-2-davidgow@google.com
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marie Zhussupova <marievic@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Currently, the in-kernel kunit test case timeout is 300 seconds. (There
is a separate timeout mechanism for the whole test execution in
kunit.py, but that's unrelated.) However, tests marked 'slow' or 'very
slow' may timeout, particularly on slower machines.
Implement a multiplier to the test-case timeout, so that slower tests
have longer to complete:
- DEFAULT -> 1x default timeout
- KUNIT_SPEED_SLOW -> 3x default timeout
- KUNIT_SPEED_VERY_SLOW -> 12x default timeout
A further change is planned to allow user configuration of the
default/base timeout to allow people with faster or slower machines to
adjust these to their use-cases.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250614084711.2654593-2-davidgow@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ujwal Jain <ujwaljain@google.com>
Co-developed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
kunit_driver_create() accepts a name for the driver, but does not copy
it, so if that name is either on the stack, or otherwise freed, we end
up with a use-after-free when the driver is cleaned up.
Instead, strdup() the name, and manage it as another KUnit allocation.
As there was no existing kunit_kstrdup(), we add one. Further, add a
kunit_ variant of strdup_const() and kfree_const(), so we don't need to
allocate and manage the string in the majority of cases where it's a
constant.
However, these are inline functions, and is_kernel_rodata() only works
for built-in code. This causes problems in two cases:
- If kunit is built as a module, __{start,end}_rodata is not defined.
- If a kunit test using these functions is built as a module, it will
suffer the same fate.
This fixes a KASAN splat with overflow.overflow_allocation_test, when
built as a module.
Restrict the is_kernel_rodata() case to when KUnit is built as a module,
which fixes the first case, at the cost of losing the optimisation.
Also, make kunit_{kstrdup,kfree}_const non-inline, so that other modules
using them will not accidentally depend on is_kernel_rodata(). If KUnit
is built-in, they'll benefit from the optimisation, if KUnit is not,
they won't, but the string will be properly duplicated.
Fixes: d03c720e03 ("kunit: Add APIs for managing devices")
Reported-by: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Closes: https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/81V9b9QYON0
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports in lib/kunit:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/kunit/kunit.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/kunit/kunit-test.o
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.o
Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit c72a870926 added a mutex to prevent kunit tests from running
concurrently. Unfortunately that mutex gets locked during module load
regardless of whether the module actually has any kunit tests. This
causes a problem for kunit tests that might need to load other kernel
modules (e.g. gss_krb5_test loading the camellia module).
So check to see if there are actually any tests to run before locking
the kunit_run_lock mutex.
Fixes: c72a870926 ("kunit: add ability to run tests after boot using debugfs")
Reported-by: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
If KUnit is built as a module, and it's unloaded, the kunit_bus is not
unregistered. This causes an error if it's then re-loaded later, as we
try to re-register the bus.
Unregister the bus and root_device on shutdown, if it looks valid.
In addition, be more specific about the value of kunit_bus_device. It
is:
- a valid struct device* if the kunit_bus initialised correctly.
- an ERR_PTR if it failed to initialise.
- NULL before initialisation and after shutdown.
Fixes: d03c720e03 ("kunit: Add APIs for managing devices")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Commit 2810c1e998 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in
kunit_free_suite_set()") fixed a wild-memory-access bug that could have
happened during the loading phase of test suites built and executed as
loadable modules. However, it also introduced a problematic side effect
that causes test suites modules to crash when they attempt to register
fake devices.
When a module is loaded, it traverses the MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED and
MODULE_STATE_COMING states before reaching the normal operating state
MODULE_STATE_LIVE. Finally, when the module is removed, it moves to
MODULE_STATE_GOING before being released. However, if the loading
function load_module() fails between complete_formation() and
do_init_module(), the module goes directly from MODULE_STATE_COMING to
MODULE_STATE_GOING without passing through MODULE_STATE_LIVE.
This behavior was causing kunit_module_exit() to be called without
having first executed kunit_module_init(). Since kunit_module_exit() is
responsible for freeing the memory allocated by kunit_module_init()
through kunit_filter_suites(), this behavior was resulting in a
wild-memory-access bug.
Commit 2810c1e998 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in
kunit_free_suite_set()") fixed this issue by running the tests when the
module is still in MODULE_STATE_COMING. However, modules in that state
are not fully initialized, lacking sysfs kobjects. Therefore, if a test
module attempts to register a fake device, it will inevitably crash.
This patch proposes a different approach to fix the original
wild-memory-access bug while restoring the normal module execution flow
by making kunit_module_exit() able to detect if kunit_module_init() has
previously initialized the tests suite set. In this way, test modules
can once again register fake devices without crashing.
This behavior is achieved by checking whether mod->kunit_suites is a
virtual or direct mapping address. If it is a virtual address, then
kunit_module_init() has allocated the suite_set in kunit_filter_suites()
using kmalloc_array(). On the contrary, if mod->kunit_suites is still
pointing to the original address that was set when looking up the
.kunit_test_suites section of the module, then the loading phase has
failed and there's no memory to be freed.
v4:
- rebased on 6.8
- noted that kunit_filter_suites() must return a virtual address
v3:
- add a comment to clarify why the start address is checked
v2:
- add include <linux/mm.h>
Fixes: 2810c1e998 ("kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in kunit_free_suite_set()")
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Tested-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <marpagan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
suite->log must be checked for NULL before passing it to
string_stream_clear(). This was done in kunit_init_test() but was missing
from kunit_init_suite().
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Fixes: 6d696c4695c5 ("kunit: add ability to run tests after boot using debugfs")
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Acked-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
If we run parameterized test that uses test->priv to prepare some
custom data, then value of test->priv will leak to the next param
iteration and may be unexpected. This could be easily seen if
we promote example_priv_test to parameterized test as then only
first test iteration will be successful:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
--kunitconfig ./lib/kunit/.kunitconfig *.example_priv*
[ ] Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
[ ] ============================================================
[ ] =================== example (1 subtest) ====================
[ ] ==================== example_priv_test ====================
[ ] [PASSED] example value 3
[ ] # example_priv_test: initializing
[ ] # example_priv_test: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:230
[ ] Expected test->priv == ((void *)0), but
[ ] test->priv == 0000000060dfe290
[ ] ((void *)0) == 0000000000000000
[ ] # example_priv_test: cleaning up
[ ] [FAILED] example value 2
[ ] # example_priv_test: initializing
[ ] # example_priv_test: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:230
[ ] Expected test->priv == ((void *)0), but
[ ] test->priv == 0000000060dfe290
[ ] ((void *)0) == 0000000000000000
[ ] # example_priv_test: cleaning up
[ ] [FAILED] example value 1
[ ] # example_priv_test: initializing
[ ] # example_priv_test: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c:230
[ ] Expected test->priv == ((void *)0), but
[ ] test->priv == 0000000060dfe290
[ ] ((void *)0) == 0000000000000000
[ ] # example_priv_test: cleaning up
[ ] [FAILED] example value 0
[ ] # example_priv_test: initializing
[ ] # example_priv_test: cleaning up
[ ] # example_priv_test: pass:1 fail:3 skip:0 total:4
[ ] ================ [FAILED] example_priv_test ================
[ ] # example: initializing suite
[ ] # module: kunit_example_test
[ ] # example: exiting suite
[ ] # Totals: pass:1 fail:3 skip:0 total:4
[ ] ===================== [FAILED] example =====================
Fix that by resetting test->priv after each param iteration, in
similar way what we did for the test->status.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Tests for drivers often require a struct device to pass to other
functions. While it's possible to create these with
root_device_register(), or to use something like a platform device, this
is both a misuse of those APIs, and can be difficult to clean up after,
for example, a failed assertion.
Add some KUnit-specific functions for registering and unregistering a
struct device:
- kunit_device_register()
- kunit_device_register_with_driver()
- kunit_device_unregister()
These helpers allocate a on a 'kunit' bus which will either probe the
driver passed in (kunit_device_register_with_driver), or will create a
stub driver (kunit_device_register) which is cleaned up on test shutdown.
Devices are automatically unregistered on test shutdown, but can be
manually unregistered earlier with kunit_device_unregister() in order
to, for example, test device release code.
Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add functionality to run built-in tests after boot by writing to a
debugfs file.
Add a new debugfs file labeled "run" for each test suite to use for
this purpose.
As an example, write to the file using the following:
echo "any string" > /sys/kernel/debugfs/kunit/<testsuite>/run
This will trigger the test suite to run and will print results to the
kernel log.
To guard against running tests concurrently with this feature, add a
mutex lock around running kunit. This supports the current practice of
not allowing tests to be run concurrently on the same kernel.
This new functionality could be used to design a parameter
injection feature in the future.
Fixed up merge conflict duing rebase to Linux 6.7-rc6
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Add KUNIT_INIT_TABLE to the INIT_DATA linker section.
Alter the KUnit macros to create init tests:
kunit_test_init_section_suites
Update lib/kunit/executor.c to run both the suites in KUNIT_TABLE and
KUNIT_INIT_TABLE.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
KUnit's deferred action API accepts a void(*)(void *) function pointer
which is called when the test is exited. However, we very frequently
want to use existing functions which accept a single pointer, but which
may not be of type void*. While this is probably dodgy enough to be on
the wrong side of the C standard, it's been often used for similar
callbacks, and gcc's -Wcast-function-type seems to ignore cases where
the only difference is the type of the argument, assuming it's
compatible (i.e., they're both pointers to data).
However, clang 16 has introduced -Wcast-function-type-strict, which no
longer permits any deviation in function pointer type. This seems to be
because it'd break CFI, which validates the type of function calls.
This rather ruins our attempts to cast functions to defer them, and
leaves us with a few options. The one we've chosen is to implement a
macro which will generate a wrapper function which accepts a void*, and
casts the argument to the appropriate type.
For example, if you were trying to wrap:
void foo_close(struct foo *handle);
you could use:
KUNIT_DEFINE_ACTION_WRAPPER(kunit_action_foo_close,
foo_close,
struct foo *);
This would create a new kunit_action_foo_close() function, of type
kunit_action_t, which could be passed into kunit_add_action() and
similar functions.
In addition to defining this macro, update KUnit and its tests to use
it.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1750
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Today we reset the suite counter as part of the suite cleanup,
called from the module exit callback, but it might not work that
well as one can try to collect results without unloading a previous
test (either unintentionally or due to dependencies).
For easy reproduction try to load the kunit-test.ko and then
collect and parse results from the kunit-example-test.ko load.
Parser will complain about mismatch of expected test number:
[ ] KTAP version 1
[ ] 1..1
[ ] # example: initializing suite
[ ] KTAP version 1
[ ] # Subtest: example
..
[ ] # example: pass:5 fail:0 skip:4 total:9
[ ] # Totals: pass:6 fail:0 skip:6 total:12
[ ] ok 7 example
[ ] [ERROR] Test: example: Expected test number 1 but found 7
[ ] ===================== [PASSED] example =====================
[ ] ============================================================
[ ] Testing complete. Ran 12 tests: passed: 6, skipped: 6, errors: 1
Since we are now printing suite test plan on every module load,
right before running suite tests, we should make sure that suite
counter will also start from 1. Easiest solution seems to be move
counter reset to the __kunit_test_suites_init() function.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Kunit recently gained support to setup attributes, the first one being
the speed of a given test, then allowing to filter out slow tests.
A slow test is defined in the documentation as taking more than one
second. There's an another speed attribute called "super slow" but whose
definition is less clear.
Add support to the test runner to check the test execution time, and
report tests that should be marked as slow but aren't.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
If we skip one parametrized test case then test status remains
SKIP for all subsequent test params leading to wrong reports:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
--kunitconfig ./lib/kunit/.kunitconfig *.example_params*
--raw_output \
[ ] Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
KTAP version 1
1..1
# example: initializing suite
KTAP version 1
# Subtest: example
# module: kunit_example_test
1..1
KTAP version 1
# Subtest: example_params_test
# example_params_test: initializing
# example_params_test: cleaning up
ok 1 example value 3 # SKIP unsupported param value 3
# example_params_test: initializing
# example_params_test: cleaning up
ok 2 example value 2 # SKIP unsupported param value 3
# example_params_test: initializing
# example_params_test: cleaning up
ok 3 example value 1 # SKIP unsupported param value 3
# example_params_test: initializing
# example_params_test: cleaning up
ok 4 example value 0 # SKIP unsupported param value 0
# example_params_test: pass:0 fail:0 skip:4 total:4
ok 1 example_params_test # SKIP unsupported param value 0
# example: exiting suite
ok 1 example # SKIP
Reset test status and status comment after each param iteration
to avoid using stale results.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
