strut intel_fb_pin_params will be an important part of the fb_pin
interface, so move the definition to the parent interface file.
Or maybe we should have a separate header for this kind of stuff
since the users of the parent interface will need the struct
definition but not the parent interface vfunc struct definitions?
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260508143426.26504-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Introduce the "fb_pin" parent interface, as the first trivial step
move the *_get_map() stuff there.
The whole "fb_pin" as an interface might not really make sense,
and perhaps this (and other stuff) should just be collected into
some kind of "bo" interface. But let's go with "fb_pin" for now
to match where things are implemented, and possibly restructure
it later.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260508143426.26504-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
The initial plane vblank wait operates on display registers,
so it really belongs in the display code proper. Move it there.
We can use intel_parent_irq_enabled() to determine if we can
rely on interrupts or not.
On average we should end up waiting half a frame here, so the
polling interval can be fairly long. 1 ms (which actually
makes poll_timeout_us() use ~250-1000 usec) seems good enough
to me.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260410150449.9699-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
The "plane_config" vs. "plane_configs" naming difference is very
subtle, making it far too easy to use the wrong thing by accident.
Introduce a separate type for the array, making it impossible to
pass in the wrong thing. And while at it name the variable
"all_plane_configs" to help the poor reader make sense of things.
The .config_fini() prototype also mistakenly used the plural
form despite only taking in a singular plane_config. So fix that
one up as well.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260410150449.9699-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Continue i915 and xe separation from display by moving the bo calls to
the display parent interface. Instead of adding all these functions to
intel_parent.[ch], reuse the now vacated intel_bo.[ch], and avoid mass
renames to calls of these functions. This is similar to
intel_display_rpm.[ch].
Make many of the hooks optional to avoid having to implement dummy
functions in xe. Indeed now we can remove many of the existing dummy
functions.
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/7899eef2ccf0cd603df69099df065226a0df917b.1773238670.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Move the get/put/ref/flush_for_display calls to the display parent
interface.
For i915, move the hooks next to the other i915 core frontbuffer code in
i915_gem_object_frontbuffer.c. For xe, add new file xe_frontbuffer.c for
the same.
Note: The intel_frontbuffer_flush() calls from
i915_gem_object_frontbuffer.c will partially route back to i915 core via
the parent interface. This is less than stellar.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/f69b967ed82bbcfd60ffa77ba197b26a1399f09f.1772475391.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
struct i915_address_space is used in an opaque fashion in the display
parent interface, but it's just one include away from being
non-opaque. And anyway the name is rather specific.
Switch to using the struct intel_dpt instead, which embeds struct
i915_address_space anyway. With the definition hidden in i915_dpt.c,
this can't be accidentally made non-opaque, and the type seems rather
more generic anyway.
We do have to add a new helper i915_dpt_to_vm(), as there's one case in
intel_fb_pin_to_dpt() that requires direct access to struct
i915_address_space. But this just underlines the point about opacity.
Reviewed-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/daa39178c0b0305b010564952d691f06e3cd63ca.1772030909.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Call the parent driver pcode functions through the parent interface
function pointers instead of expecting both to have functions of the
same name.
In i915, add the interface to existing intel_pcode.[ch], while in xe
move them to new display/xe_display_pcode.[ch] and build it only for
CONFIG_DRM_XE_DISPLAY=y.
Do not add separate write and write_timeout calls in the
interface. Instead, handle the default 1 ms timeout in the
intel_parent.c glue layer.
This drops the last intel_pcode.h includes from display, and allows us
to remove the corresponding xe compat header.
v2: initialize .pcode in i915
Reviewed-by: Michał Grzelak <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260126112925.2452171-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Move the DSB buffer handling to the display parent interface, making
display more independent of i915 and xe driver implementations.
Since the DSB parent interface is only called from intel_dsb.c, add the
wrappers there with smaller visibility instead of the usual
intel_parent.[ch], and using struct intel_dsb as the context parameter
for convenience.
Unfortunately, memset() being a macro in linux/fortify-string.h, we
can't use that as the function pointer name. dsb->memset() would be
using the macro and leading to build failures. Therefore, use .fill()
for the memset() functionality.
v2: s/memset/fill/
Reviewed-by: Michał Grzelak <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/df117c862a6d34dae340e4a85c2482b4e29c8884.1768923917.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Ville Syrjälä
Jani Nikula