96 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Mark HarmstoneandDavid Sterba ef6a31d035 btrfs: add definitions and constants for remap-tree
Add an incompat flag for the new remap-tree feature, and the constants
and definitions needed to support it.

Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2026-02-03 07:54:02 +01:00
David Sterba 17dc82dc1e btrfs: fix typos in comments and strings
Annual typo fixing pass. Strangely codespell found only about 30% of
what is in this patch, the rest was done manually using text
spellchecker with a custom dictionary of acceptable terms.

Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa <neal@gompa.dev>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-09-23 08:49:16 +02:00
David Sterba f963e0128b btrfs: trivial conversion to return bool instead of int
Old code has a lot of int for bool return values, bool is recommended
and done in new code. Convert the trivial cases that do simple 0/false
and 1/true. Functions comment are updated if needed.

Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15 14:30:49 +02:00
David Sterba 6149c82bda btrfs: update include and forward declarations in headers
Pass over all header files and add missing forward declarations,
includes or fix include types.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-03-18 20:35:43 +01:00
Dr. David Alan GilbertandDavid Sterba b628c13951 btrfs: remove unused btrfs_try_tree_write_lock()
btrfs_try_tree_write_lock() has been unused since commit
50b21d7a06 ("btrfs: submit a writeback bio per extent_buffer").
Remove it as we don't need it anymore.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-11-11 14:34:14 +01:00
Josef BacikandDavid Sterba e094f48040 btrfs: change root->root_key.objectid to btrfs_root_id()
A comment from Filipe on one of my previous cleanups brought my
attention to a new helper we have for getting the root id of a root,
which makes it easier to read in the code.

The changes where made with the following Coccinelle semantic patch:

// <smpl>
@@
expression E,E1;
@@
(
 E->root_key.objectid = E1
|
- E->root_key.objectid
+ btrfs_root_id(E)
)
// </smpl>

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ minor style fixups ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-05-07 21:31:06 +02:00
Filipe MananaandDavid Sterba c79f57eafc btrfs: avoid pointless wake ups of drew lock readers
When unlocking a write lock on a drew lock, at btrfs_drew_write_unlock(),
it's pointless to wake up tasks waiting to acquire a read lock if we
didn't decrement the 'writers' counter down to 0, since a read lock can
only be acquired when the counter reaches a value of 0. Doing so is
harmless from a functional point of view, but it's not efficient due to
unnecessarily waking up tasks just for them to sleep again on the
waitqueue.

So change this to wake up readers only if we decremented the 'writers'
counter to 0.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-05-07 21:31:00 +02:00
Filipe MananaandDavid Sterba 2066bbfccf btrfs: locking: rename __btrfs_tree_lock() and __btrfs_tree_read_lock()
The __btrfs_tree_lock() and __btrfs_tree_read_lock() are using a naming
with a double underscore prefix, which is specially not proper for
exported functions. Remove the double underscore prefix from their name
and add the "_nested" suffix.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-05-07 21:31:00 +02:00
Filipe MananaandDavid Sterba f40ca9cb58 btrfs: locking: inline btrfs_tree_lock() and btrfs_tree_read_lock()
The functions btrfs_tree_lock() and btrfs_tree_read_lock() are very
trivial so that can be made inline and avoid call overhead, as they
are very often called inside critical sections (when searching a btree
for example, attempting to lock a child node/leaf while holding a lock
on the parent).

So make them static inline, which even reduces the size of the btrfs
module a little bit.

Before this change:

   $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
      text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   1718786	 156276	  16920	1891982	 1cde8e	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko

After this change:

   $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
      text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   1718650	 156260	  16920	1891830	 1cddf6	fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko

Running fs_mark also showed a tiny improvement with this script:

   $ cat test.sh
   #!/bin/bash

   DEV=/dev/nullb0
   MNT=/mnt/nullb0
   FILES=100000
   THREADS=$(nproc --all)

   echo "performance" | \
       tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor

   umount $DEV &> /dev/null
   mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
   mount $DEV $MNT

   OPTS="-S 0 -L 5 -n $FILES -s 0 -t $THREADS -k"
   for ((i = 1; i <= $THREADS; i++)); do
        OPTS="$OPTS -d $MNT/d$i"
   done

   fs_mark $OPTS

   umount $MNT

Before this change:

   FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
       10      1200000            0     180894.0         10705410
       16      2400000            0     228211.4         10765738
       23      3600000            0     215969.6         11011072
       30      4800000            0     199077.1         11145587
       46      6000000            0     176624.1         11658470

After this change:

   FSUse%        Count         Size    Files/sec     App Overhead
       10      1200000            0     185312.3         10708377
       16      2400000            0     229320.4         10858013
       23      3600000            0     217958.7         11006167
       30      4800000            0     205122.9         11112899
       46      6000000            0     178039.1         11438852

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-05-07 21:31:00 +02:00
David Sterba 504a00ac48 btrfs: change BUG_ON to assertion when verifying lockdep class setup
The BUG_ON in btrfs_set_buffer_lockdep_class() is a sanity check of the
level which is verified in callers, e.g. when initializing an extent
buffer or reading from an eb header. Change it to an assertion as this
would not happen unless things are really bad and would fail elsewhere
too.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-03-04 16:24:48 +01:00
David Sterba 2b712e3bb2 btrfs: remove unused included headers
With help of neovim, LSP and clangd we can identify header files that
are not actually needed to be included in the .c files. This is focused
only on removal (with minor fixups), further cleanups are possible but
will require doing the header files properly with forward declarations,
minimized includes and include-what-you-use care.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-03-04 16:24:46 +01:00
Johannes ThumshirnandDavid Sterba ee1293308e btrfs: add raid stripe tree definitions
Add definitions for the raid stripe tree. This tree will hold information
about the on-disk layout of the stripes in a RAID set.

Each stripe extent has a 1:1 relationship with an on-disk extent item and
is doing the logical to per-drive physical address translation for the
extent item in question.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12 16:44:09 +02:00
David Sterba 150cce2d9f btrfs: move extent_buffer::lock_owner to debug section
The lock_owner is used for a rare corruption case and we haven't seen
any reports in years. Move it to the debugging section of eb.  To close
the holes also move log_index so the final layout looks like:

struct extent_buffer {
        u64                        start;                /*     0     8 */
        long unsigned int          len;                  /*     8     8 */
        long unsigned int          bflags;               /*    16     8 */
        struct btrfs_fs_info *     fs_info;              /*    24     8 */
        spinlock_t                 refs_lock;            /*    32     4 */
        atomic_t                   refs;                 /*    36     4 */
        int                        read_mirror;          /*    40     4 */
        s8                         log_index;            /*    44     1 */

        /* XXX 3 bytes hole, try to pack */

        struct callback_head       callback_head __attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /*    48    16 */
        /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
        struct rw_semaphore        lock;                 /*    64    40 */
        struct page *              pages[16];            /*   104   128 */

        /* size: 232, cachelines: 4, members: 11 */
        /* sum members: 229, holes: 1, sum holes: 3 */
        /* forced alignments: 1, forced holes: 1, sum forced holes: 3 */
        /* last cacheline: 40 bytes */
} __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));

This saves 8 bytes in total and still keeps the lock on a separate cacheline.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12 16:44:05 +02:00
David Sterba 9580503bcb btrfs: reformat remaining kdoc style comments
Function name in the comment does not bring much value to code not
exposed as API and we don't stick to the kdoc format anymore. Update
formatting of parameter descriptions.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12 16:44:04 +02:00
Josef BacikandDavid Sterba 5335f4376c btrfs: include trace header in where necessary
If we no longer include the tracepoints from ctree.h we fail to compile
because we have the dependency in some of the header files and source
files.  Add the include where we have these dependencies to allow us to
remove the include from ctree.h.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12 16:44:03 +02:00
David Sterba 1a1b0e729d btrfs: add block-group tree to lockdep classes
The block group tree was not present among the lockdep classes. We could
get potentially lockdep warnings but so far none has been seen, also
because block-group-tree is a relatively new feature.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-06-19 13:59:35 +02:00
David Sterba 0b5485391d btrfs: locking: use atomic for DREW lock writers
The DREW lock uses percpu variable to track lock counters and for that
it needs to allocate the structure. In btrfs_read_tree_root() or
btrfs_init_fs_root() this may add another error case or requires the
NOFS scope protection.

One way is to preallocate the structure as was suggested in
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20221214021125.28289-1-robbieko@synology.com/

We may avoid the allocation altogether if we don't use the percpu
variables but an atomic for the writer counter. This should not make any
difference, the DREW lock is used for truncate and NOCOW writes along
with other IO operations.

The percpu counter for writers has been there since the original commit
8257b2dc3c "Btrfs: introduce btrfs_{start, end}_nocow_write() for
each subvolume". The reason could be to avoid hammering the same
cacheline from all the readers but then the writers do that anyway.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-04-17 18:01:17 +02:00
Josef BacikandDavid Sterba 07e81dc944 btrfs: move accessor helpers into accessors.h
This is a large patch, but because they're all macros it's impossible to
split up.  Simply copy all of the item accessors in ctree.h and paste
them in accessors.h, and then update any files to include the header so
everything compiles.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ reformat comments, style fixups ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05 18:00:42 +01:00
Josef BacikandDavid Sterba 857bc13f85 btrfs: implement a nowait option for tree searches
For NOWAIT IOCBs we'll need a way to tell search to not wait on locks
or anything.  Accomplish this by adding a path->nowait flag that will
use trylocks and skip reading of metadata, returning -EAGAIN in either
of these cases.  For now we only need this for reads, so only the read
side is handled.  Add an ASSERT() to catch anybody trying to use this
for writes so they know they'll have to implement the write side.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26 12:46:42 +02:00
Josef BacikandDavid Sterba b40130b23c btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers
We have been hitting the following lockdep splat with btrfs/187 recently

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  5.19.0-rc8+ #775 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  btrfs/752500 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff97e1875a97b8 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #2 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
	 btrfs_init_new_buffer+0x7d/0x2c0
	 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x120/0x3b0
	 __btrfs_cow_block+0x136/0x600
	 btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x230
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x53b/0xb70
	 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0xa0
	 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x280
	 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x24c/0x290
	 btrfs_work_helper+0xf2/0x3e0
	 process_one_work+0x271/0x590
	 worker_thread+0x52/0x3b0
	 kthread+0xf0/0x120
	 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

  -> #1 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}:
	 down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x3c3/0xb70
	 do_relocation+0x10c/0x6b0
	 relocate_tree_blocks+0x317/0x6d0
	 relocate_block_group+0x1f1/0x560
	 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
	 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
	 btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
	 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  -> #0 (btrfs-treloc-02#2){+.+.}-{3:3}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10
	 lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0
	 down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
	 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
	 btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50
	 btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70
	 replace_path+0x541/0x9f0
	 merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610
	 merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260
	 relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560
	 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
	 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
	 btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
	 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
	 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    btrfs-treloc-02#2 --> btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-01);
				 lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
    lock(btrfs-treloc-02#2);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  7 locks held by btrfs/752500:
   #0: ffff97e292fdf460 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x208/0x2c90
   #1: ffff97e284c02050 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_balance+0x55f/0xe40
   #2: ffff97e284c00878 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x236/0x400
   #3: ffff97e292fdf650 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xef/0x610
   #4: ffff97e284c02378 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0
   #5: ffff97e284c023a0 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x1a8/0x5a0
   #6: ffff97e1875a9278 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 1 PID: 752500 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8+ #775
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:

   dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x73
   check_noncircular+0xd6/0x100
   ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
   __lock_acquire+0x1122/0x1e10
   lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2d0
   ? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
   down_write_nested+0x41/0x80
   ? __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
   __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x110
   btrfs_lock_root_node+0x31/0x50
   btrfs_search_slot+0x1cb/0xb70
   ? lock_release+0x137/0x2d0
   ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x50
   ? release_extent_buffer+0x128/0x180
   replace_path+0x541/0x9f0
   merge_reloc_root+0x1d6/0x610
   merge_reloc_roots+0xe2/0x260
   relocate_block_group+0x2c8/0x560
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x23e/0x400
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x4c/0x140
   btrfs_balance+0x755/0xe40
   btrfs_ioctl+0x1ea2/0x2c90
   ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
   ? lock_is_held_type+0xe2/0x140
   ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
   do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

This isn't necessarily new, it's just tricky to hit in practice.  There
are two competing things going on here.  With relocation we create a
snapshot of every fs tree with a reloc tree.  Any extent buffers that
get initialized here are initialized with the reloc root lockdep key.
However since it is a snapshot, any blocks that are currently in cache
that originally belonged to the fs tree will have the normal tree
lockdep key set.  This creates the lock dependency of

  reloc tree -> normal tree

for the extent buffer locking during the first phase of the relocation
as we walk down the reloc root to relocate blocks.

However this is problematic because the final phase of the relocation is
merging the reloc root into the original fs root.  This involves
searching down to any keys that exist in the original fs root and then
swapping the relocated block and the original fs root block.  We have to
search down to the fs root first, and then go search the reloc root for
the block we need to replace.  This creates the dependency of

  normal tree -> reloc tree

which is why lockdep complains.

Additionally even if we were to fix this particular mismatch with a
different nesting for the merge case, we're still slotting in a block
that has a owner of the reloc root objectid into a normal tree, so that
block will have its lockdep key set to the tree reloc root, and create a
lockdep splat later on when we wander into that block from the fs root.

Unfortunately the only solution here is to make sure we do not set the
lockdep key to the reloc tree lockdep key normally, and then reset any
blocks we wander into from the reloc root when we're doing the merged.

This solves the problem of having mixed tree reloc keys intermixed with
normal tree keys, and then allows us to make sure in the merge case we
maintain the lock order of

  normal tree -> reloc tree

We handle this by setting a bit on the reloc root when we do the search
for the block we want to relocate, and any block we search into or COW
at that point gets set to the reloc tree key.  This works correctly
because we only ever COW down to the parent node, so we aren't resetting
the key for the block we're linking into the fs root.

With this patch we no longer have the lockdep splat in btrfs/187.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-08-17 16:19:12 +02:00
Josef BacikandDavid Sterba 0a27a0474d btrfs: move lockdep class helpers to locking.c
These definitions exist in disk-io.c, which is not related to the
locking.  Move this over to locking.h/c where it makes more sense.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-08-17 16:19:10 +02:00
Zygo BlaxellandDavid Sterba 97e86631bc btrfs: don't set lock_owner when locking extent buffer for reading
In 196d59ab9c "btrfs: switch extent buffer tree lock to rw_semaphore"
the functions for tree read locking were rewritten, and in the process
the read lock functions started setting eb->lock_owner = current->pid.
Previously lock_owner was only set in tree write lock functions.

Read locks are shared, so they don't have exclusive ownership of the
underlying object, so setting lock_owner to any single value for a
read lock makes no sense.  It's mostly harmless because write locks
and read locks are mutually exclusive, and none of the existing code
in btrfs (btrfs_init_new_buffer and print_eb_refs_lock) cares what
nonsense is written in lock_owner when no writer is holding the lock.

KCSAN does care, and will complain about the data race incessantly.
Remove the assignments in the read lock functions because they're
useless noise.

Fixes: 196d59ab9c ("btrfs: switch extent buffer tree lock to rw_semaphore")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-06-21 14:46:56 +02:00
David Sterba 1a9fd4172d btrfs: fix typos in comments
Fix typos that have snuck in since the last round. Found by codespell.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22 14:11:57 +02:00
Josef BacikandDavid Sterba 0ecae6fffe btrfs: remove the recurse parameter from __btrfs_tree_read_lock
It is completely unused now, remove it.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-12-08 15:54:09 +01:00
Josef BacikandDavid Sterba 1bb9659841 btrfs: merge back btrfs_read_lock_root_node helpers
We no longer have recursive locking and there's no need for separate
helpers that allowed the transition to rwsem with minimal code changes.

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-12-08 15:54:09 +01:00