Rule ZTXDS of the MPAM specification, IHI009 version B.b, states: "If a
monitor does not support automatic updates of NRDY, software can use that
bit for any purpose."
As software is not reliably informed whether or not the monitor supports
automatic updates of NRDY always assume that hardware may manage NRDY but
don't rely on it. When NRDY is truly untouched by hardware then, as it is
written to 0 on configuration, it will always read 0.
At probe it's checked if MSMON_CSU.NRDY and MSMON_MBWU.NRDY are hardware
managed but not MSMON_MBWU_L.NDRY. Specialize the checking for hardware
managed NRDY to CSU counters as this is the only case where hardware
management makes sense. Continue to inform the user if MSMON_CSU.NRDY
appears to be hardware managed but the firmware doesn't provide the
associated time limit for the automatic clearing of NRDY. Remove the NRDY
feature flags as they are now unused.
Fixes: 8c90dc68a5 ("arm_mpam: Probe the hardware features resctrl supports")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
CMN-650 is afflicted with an erratum where the CSU NRDY bit never clears.
This tells us the monitor never finishes scanning the cache. The erratum
document says to wait the maximum time, then ignore the field.
Add a flag to indicate whether this is the final attempt to read the
counter, and when this quirk is applied, ignore the NRDY field.
This means accesses to this counter will always retry, even if the counter
was previously programmed to the same values.
The counter value is not expected to be stable, it drifts up and down with
each allocation and eviction. The CSU register provides the value for a
point in time.
Tested-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Jesse Chick <jessechick@os.amperecomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Co-developed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
The registers MSMON_MBWU_L and MSMON_MBWU return the number of requests
rather than the number of bytes transferred.
Bandwidth resource monitoring is performed at the last level cache, where
each request arrive in 64Byte granularity. The current implementation
returns the number of transactions received at the last level cache but
does not provide the value in bytes. Scaling by 64 gives an accurate byte
count to match the MPAM specification for the MSMON_MBWU and MSMON_MBWU_L
registers. This patch fixes the issue by reporting the actual number of
bytes instead of the number of transactions from __ris_msmon_read().
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Jesse Chick <jessechick@os.amperecomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
In the T241 implementation of memory-bandwidth partitioning, in the absence
of contention for bandwidth, the minimum bandwidth setting can affect the
amount of achieved bandwidth. Specifically, the achieved bandwidth in the
absence of contention can settle to any value between the values of
MPAMCFG_MBW_MIN and MPAMCFG_MBW_MAX. Also, if MPAMCFG_MBW_MIN is set
zero (below 0.78125%), once a core enters a throttled state, it will never
leave that state.
The first issue is not a concern if the MPAM software allows to program
MPAMCFG_MBW_MIN through the sysfs interface. This patch ensures program
MBW_MIN=1 (0.78125%) whenever MPAMCFG_MBW_MIN=0 is programmed.
In the scenario where the resctrl doesn't support the MBW_MIN interface via
sysfs, to achieve bandwidth closer to MBW_MAX in the absence of contention,
software should configure a relatively narrow gap between MBW_MIN and
MBW_MAX. The recommendation is to use a 5% gap to mitigate the problem.
Clear the feature MBW_MIN feature from the class to ensure we don't
accidentally change behaviour when resctrl adds support for a MBW_MIN
interface.
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Jesse Chick <jessechick@os.amperecomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
The MPAM bandwidth partitioning controls will not be correctly configured,
and hardware will retain default configuration register values, meaning
generally that bandwidth will remain unprovisioned.
To address the issue, follow the below steps after updating the MBW_MIN
and/or MBW_MAX registers.
- Perform 64b reads from all 12 bridge MPAM shadow registers at offsets
(0x360048 + slice*0x10000 + partid*8). These registers are read-only.
- Continue iterating until all 12 shadow register values match in a loop.
pr_warn_once if the values fail to match within the loop count 1000.
- Perform 64b writes with the value 0x0 to the two spare registers at
offsets 0x1b0000 and 0x1c0000.
In the hardware, writes to the MPAMCFG_MBW_MAX MPAMCFG_MBW_MIN registers
are transformed into broadcast writes to the 12 shadow registers. The
final two writes to the spare registers cause a final rank of downstream
micro-architectural MPAM registers to be updated from the shadow copies.
The intervening loop to read the 12 shadow registers helps avoid a race
condition where writes to the spare registers occur before all shadow
registers have been updated.
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com>
Tested-by: Jesse Chick <jessechick@os.amperecomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Add the boilerplate that tells resctrl about the mpam monitors that are
available. resctrl expects all (non-telemetry) monitors to be on the L3 and
so advertise them there and invent an L3 resctrl resource if required. The
L3 cache itself has to exist as the cache ids are used as the domain
ids.
Bring the resctrl monitor domains online and offline based on the cpus
they contain.
Support for specific monitor types is left to later.
Tested-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Jesse Chick <jessechick@os.amperecomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Intel RDT's CDP feature allows the cache to use a different control value
depending on whether the accesses was for instruction fetch or a data
access. MPAM's equivalent feature is the other way up: the CPU assigns a
different partid label to traffic depending on whether it was instruction
fetch or a data access, which causes the cache to use a different control
value based solely on the partid.
MPAM can emulate CDP, with the side effect that the alternative partid is
seen by all MSC, it can't be enabled per-MSC.
Add the resctrl hooks to turn this on or off. Add the helpers that match a
closid against a task, which need to be aware that the value written to
hardware is not the same as the one resctrl is using.
Update the 'arm64_mpam_global_default' variable the arch code uses during
context switch to know when the per-cpu value should be used instead. Also,
update these per-cpu values and sync the resulting mpam partid/pmg
configuration to hardware.
resctrl can enable CDP for L2 caches, L3 caches or both. When it is enabled
by one and not the other MPAM globally enabled CDP but hides the effect
on the other cache resource. This hiding is possible as CPOR is the only
supported cache control and that uses a resource bitmap; two partids with
the same bitmap act as one.
Awkwardly, the MB controls don't implement CDP and CDP can't be hidden as
the memory bandwidth control is a maximum per partid which can't be
modelled with more partids. If the total maximum is used for both the data
and instruction partids then then the maximum may be exceeded and if it is
split in two then the one using more bandwidth will hit a lower
limit. Hence, hide the MB controls completely if CDP is enabled for any
resource.
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com>
Tested-by: Jesse Chick <jessechick@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Amit Singh Tomar <amitsinght@marvell.com>
Reviewed-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Co-developed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
resctrl has its own data structures to describe its resources. We can't use
these directly as we play tricks with the 'MBA' resource, picking the MPAM
controls or monitors that best apply. We may export the same component as
both L3 and MBA.
Add mpam_resctrl_res[] as the array of class->resctrl mappings we are
exporting, and add the cpuhp hooks that allocated and free the resctrl
domain structures. Only the mpam control feature are considered here and
monitor support will be added later.
While we're here, plumb in a few other obvious things.
CONFIG_ARM_CPU_RESCTRL is used to allow this code to be built even though
it can't yet be linked against resctrl.
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com>
Tested-by: Jesse Chick <jessechick@os.amperecomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Co-developed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
MPAM allows traffic in the SoC to be labeled by the OS, these labels are
used to apply policy in caches and bandwidth regulators, and to monitor
traffic in the SoC. The label is made up of a PARTID and PMG value. The x86
equivalent calls these CLOSID and RMID, but they don't map precisely.
MPAM has two CPU system registers that is used to hold the PARTID and PMG
values that traffic generated at each exception level will use. These can
be set per-task by the resctrl file system. (resctrl is the defacto
interface for controlling this stuff).
Add a helper to switch this.
struct task_struct's separate CLOSID and RMID fields are insufficient to
implement resctrl using MPAM, as resctrl can change the PARTID (CLOSID) and
PMG (sort of like the RMID) separately. On x86, the rmid is an independent
number, so a race that writes a mismatched closid and rmid into hardware is
benign. On arm64, the pmg bits extend the partid.
(i.e. partid-5 has a pmg-0 that is not the same as partid-6's pmg-0). In
this case, mismatching the values will 'dirty' a pmg value that resctrl
believes is clean, and is not tracking with its 'limbo' code.
To avoid this, the partid and pmg are always read and written as a
pair. This requires a new u64 field. In struct task_struct there are two
u32, rmid and closid for the x86 case, but as we can't use them here do
something else. Add this new field, mpam_partid_pmg, to struct thread_info
to avoid adding more architecture specific code to struct task_struct.
Always use READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() when accessing this field.
Resctrl allows a per-cpu 'default' value to be set, this overrides the
values when scheduling a task in the default control-group, which has
PARTID 0. The way 'code data prioritisation' gets emulated means the
register value for the default group needs to be a variable.
The current system register value is kept in a per-cpu variable to avoid
writing to the system register if the value isn't going to change. Writes
to this register may reset the hardware state for regulating bandwidth.
Finally, there is no reason to context switch these registers unless there
is a driver changing the values in struct task_struct. Hide the whole thing
behind a static key. This also allows the driver to disable MPAM in
response to errors reported by hardware. Move the existing static key to
belong to the arch code, as in the future the MPAM driver may become a
loadable module.
All this should depend on whether there is an MPAM driver, hide it behind
CONFIG_ARM64_MPAM.
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com>
Tested-by: Jesse Chick <jessechick@os.amperecomputing.com>
CC: Amit Singh Tomar <amitsinght@marvell.com>
Reviewed-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Co-developed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To indicate that the configuration, of the controls used by resctrl, in a
RIS need resetting to driver defaults the reset flags in mpam_config are
set. However, these flags are only ever set temporarily at RIS scope in
mpam_reset_ris() and hence mpam_cpu_online() will never reset these
controls to default. As the hardware reset is unknown this leads to unknown
configuration when the control values haven't been configured away from the
defaults.
Use the policy that an unset feature configuration bit means reset. In this
way the mpam_config in the component can encode that it should be in reset
state and mpam_reprogram_msc() will reset controls as needed.
Fixes: 09b89d2a72 ("arm_mpam: Allow configuration to be applied and restored during cpu online")
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Jesse Chick <jessechick@os.amperecomputing.com>
[ morse: Removed unused reset flags from config structure ]
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
In the test__props_mismatch() kunit test we rely on the struct mpam_props
being packed to ensure memcmp doesn't consider packing. Making it packed
reduces the alignment of the features bitmap and so breaks a requirement
for the use of atomics. As we don't rely on the set/clear of these bits
being atomic, just make them non-atomic.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Fixes: 8c90dc68a5 ("arm_mpam: Probe the hardware features resctrl supports")
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
